Princess Jodie
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.seduction.fast Profile…
 Up
Princess Jodie         


Author: ZFORCE
Date: Jul 8, 2008 02:07

I wonder if Gordita went postal on her?
9 Comments
Re: Princess Jodie         


Author: lolatgman
Date: Jul 9, 2008 12:42

ZFORCE wrote:
> I wonder if Gordita went postal on her?

Princess Jodie lives 2,687 miles away from Gordon, so there's no
chance of that happening. Although Gordon has harassed her over AIM at
least once since it became clear to everyone, including Gordon Roy
Parker, that Project 5000 was a failure.
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster is a paid shill         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Jul 9, 2008 00:52

Three or four "NLP students" who work for the same outfit, and who are paid
to disparage me, have all resurfaced in the past week.

While I could reveal a lot more about the previous poster, as one of his
former "co-shills" FLIPPED against this whole operation a while back, it's
more expedient to do that when it's time to deal with this in a more formal
setting.

It also wouldn't be the first time they have tried to use third parties as
pawns. In this case, it's an attempt to discourage other women from working
with me, such as with my video business.

Unless they want to pay really good money to women not to work for me,
they're not going to have so much success.

The guru who puts these losers up to this behavior is extremely desperate
these days, as also evidenced by the previous poster's pathetic conduct.

--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Show full article (1.79Kb)
no comments
Re: Princess Jodie         


Author: lolatgman
Date: Jul 9, 2008 12:56

lolatg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ZFORCE wrote:
>> I wonder if Gordita went postal on her?
>
> Princess Jodie lives 2,687 miles away from Gordon, so there's no
> chance of that happening. Although Gordon has harassed her over AIM at
> least once since it became clear to everyone, including Gordon Roy
> Parker, that Project 5000 was a failure.

Here's a post from when Gordon still had the videos from Princess
Jodie up on his Youtube account where I reveal the distance between
Gordon and his beloved Princess Jodie. Beware, there is some imagery
involved that you may not be able to get out of your head:

----Begin re-run from last year----

John Michaels wrote:
> Ray loves to posts reviews of other people's work like he is an expert or
> something. Recently he posted some YouTube clips at his recent attempt at
> another Yahoo group. This project 5000 crap. Yep, those same people he
> filed suit again.
Show full article (3.87Kb)
no comments
Re: Princess Jodie         


Author: lolatgman
Date: Jul 9, 2008 13:17

Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot wrote:
> Three or four "NLP students" who work for the same outfit, and who are paid
> to disparage me, have all resurfaced in the past week.

Name them.
> While I could reveal a lot more about the previous poster,

Like what?
> as one of his
> former "co-shills" FLIPPED against this whole operation a while back, it's
> more expedient to do that when it's time to deal with this in a more formal
> setting.

So, you're going to be wearing a tuxedo while you rant about people
posting about your past failures?
> It also wouldn't be the first time they have tried to use third parties as
> pawns. In this case, it's an attempt to discourage other women from working
> with me, such as with my video business.

All anyone did was tell Princess Jodie your real name. After she
Googled that and found out what you're like, she decided she wanted
nothing to do with you.
Show full article (2.72Kb)
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster lies and then wonders why no one believes him         


Author: Krus T. Olfard
Date: Jul 9, 2008 15:34

> While I could reveal a lot more about the previous poster, as one of
> his former "co-shills" FLIPPED against this whole operation a while
> back...
>

you're lying again, aren't you, gordy roy parker?

Don't you ever get tired of lying in this newsgroup and making yourself
look like a demented idiot by doing so?

I suppose not, since it appears that you do it so often on so many
subjects.

Tell you what, gordy loser, provide verifiable evidence that just ONE
poster in this newsgroup is a paid shill - just ONE - but that does need
verifiable evidence, you know, that pesky thing known as PROOF that you
always get your kooksuits tossed because of the lack thereof?
Anyway, gordy loser, provide verifiable evidence that just ONE poster in
this newsgroup is a paid shill - just ONE - and gain some credibility.
Until you do that or something similar to that you will have NO
credibility because your constant lies and evasions and deflections have
killed any chance of people believing your unsupported word.
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster is foolish, among other attributes         


Author: Krus T. Olfard
Date: Jul 9, 2008 15:37

pathetic, whined:
>
> Unless they want to pay really good money to women not to work for me,
> they're not going to have so much success.
>
>

Wow, all those women who are jumping at the chance to work for you...
amazing... I bet you could talk a number of those eager women into posing
in a photo with you since they are so eager to work for you.

Really, gordy roy parker, I bet you could talk a number of those eager
women into posing in a photo with you since they are so eager to work for
you...

Notta chance in hell, is there.

--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
Show full article (0.90Kb)
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster is a paid shill         


Author: Frisco Del Rosario
Date: Jul 9, 2008 16:31

In article pghconnect.com>,
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Three or four "NLP students" who work for the same outfit, and who are paid
> to disparage me, have all resurfaced in the past week.

Gordon Roy, would you please reveal the name of that outfit, so that I
can tell the that I will do that job for much less than those three or
four others?

Then I'll give you have of whatever they pay me. It's the easiest money
you'll ever make.

Everyone wins. The "outfit" wins because they pay me less. I win because
I get paid to disparage you, which I'd do for free. You win because you
get paid for nothing.

Everyone wins unless it's just a figment of your stupid imagination, you
worthless piece of shit.
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster is a paid shill         


Author: Anonymous
Date: Jul 9, 2008 18:54

In article pghconnect.com>
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
> Three or four "NLP students" who work for the same outfit, and who are paid
> to disparage me, have all resurfaced in the past week.
>
> While I could reveal a lot more about the previous poster, as one of his
> former "co-shills" FLIPPED against this whole operation a while back, it's
> more expedient to do that when it's time to deal with this in a more formal
> setting.
>
> It also wouldn't be the first time they have tried to use third parties as
> pawns. In this case, it's an attempt to discourage other women from working
> with me, such as with my video business.
>
> Unless they want to pay really good money to women not to work for me,
> they're not going to have so much success.
>
> The guru who puts these losers up to this behavior is extremely desperate
> these days, as also evidenced by the previous poster's pathetic conduct. ...
Show full article (1.43Kb)
no comments
Re: The Previous Poster is a paid shill         


Author: Odious
Date: Jul 9, 2008 20:03

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:G_WdnScRl6etiujVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
> Three or four "NLP students" who work for the same outfit, and who are
> paid to disparage me, have all resurfaced in the past week.
>

Why can't you name who is paying these people you claim are shills?

Oh that's right, because you're lying in a desperate craven attempt to
rationalize why nobody seems to be conforming to your delusional view of how
things are supposed to be.
no comments