Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.seduction.fast Profile…
 Up
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: samsloan
Date: Aug 7, 2008 14:02

On Aug 7, 3:40 pm, teddyb...@johndoes.org wrote:
> This suit is about to be thrown out, IMHO however there is an obstruction to
> an appeal. The won't take it until he pays his fees from his last Debacle
> if they are put on notice.......

Would you mind telling us how you know this or if you are sure about
this?

Sam Sloan
8 Comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Aug 7, 2008 14:13

> Would you mind telling us how you know this or if you are sure about
> this?

He's not. If the suit isn't dismissed, he'll say you shouldn't have
listened to him.

--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru

Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From

Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf

Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing

Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Paul Robinson
Date: Aug 7, 2008 15:58

On Aug 7, 5:02 pm, samsloan gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 3:40 pm, teddyb...@johndoes.org wrote:
>
>> This suit is about to be thrown out, IMHO however there is an obstruction to
>> an appeal. The won't take it until he pays his fees from his last Debacle
>> if they are put on notice.......
>
> Would you mind telling us how you know this or if you are sure about
> this?
>
> Sam Sloan

So far, Parker has lost every lawsuit he has ever filed. He still
lacks the experience or knowledge necessary to know when he has a
valid claim. He's what they sometimes refer to as a "professional
plaintiff" except that implies he's won at least one case. Parker
always loses his cases because he doesn't know what he's doing:

"Plaintiff is... completely incomprehensible..." {Gordon Roy Parker v.
Google, Inc.} 422 F. Supp 2d 492 (2006, E.D. PA)
Show full article (1.08Kb)
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Aug 7, 2008 16:14

> So far, Parker has lost every lawsuit he has ever filed.

That is incorrect by a lot.

Further, when people begin targeting someone because they lost activist
lawsuits that were attempts to resolve new law, it's not the same thing.

I also had a USCF insider literally drop the evidence for this one into my
lap.

The previous poster is not an attorney, and likely doesn't expect anyone to
take what he says as meaningful in the legal sense.

Yahoo and Microsoft were quite confident they'd prevail against me prior to
oral arguments on their motions to dismiss as well, but a few minutes into
the hearing, they realzied that wasn't going to be the case.

What will be interesting is when those who think they are above the law
actually get checked by the system. Odds are they'll rant even louder, as
they seem to have no contingency plans for what happens when they are the
ones who lose.

--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Show full article (1.72Kb)
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Alex
Date: Aug 7, 2008 17:20

in article sZCdnVwl-NPy-AbVnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@pghconnect.com, Ray Gordon,
creator of absolutely nothing at ray@cybersheet.com wrote on 8/7/08 5:13 PM:
>
>> Would you mind telling us how you know this or if you are sure about
>> this?
>
> He's not. If the suit isn't dismissed, he'll say you shouldn't have
> listened to him.
>

I think it's hilarious that fr00t l00p complains about the length of other
people's motions.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Alex
Date: Aug 7, 2008 17:25

in article 14idnYoaoelyHAbVnZ2dnUVZ_r3inZ2d@pghconnect.com, Ray Gordon,
creator of the "pivot" at ray@cybersheet.com wrote on 8/7/08 7:14 PM:
>> So far, Parker has lost every lawsuit he has ever filed.
>
> That is incorrect by a lot.

So you say, but you have no credibility.
>
> Further, when people begin targeting someone because they lost activist
> lawsuits that were attempts to resolve new law, it's not the same thing.

Activist lawsuits? Bullshit.

Have you read your own pleadings?
>
> I also had a USCF insider literally drop the evidence for this one into my
> lap.

Another example of the boy who cried "unicorn."
>
> The previous poster is not an attorney, and likely doesn't expect anyone to
> take what he says as meaningful in the legal sense.

You're not an attorney either, fr00t l00p.
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: more foolishness         


Author: Krus T. Olfard
Date: Aug 7, 2008 18:05

gordy roy parker of the fairfax dump parkers, legal buffoon, whined:
>> So far, Parker has lost every lawsuit he has ever filed.
>
> That is incorrect by a lot.
>
>

Then prove that you have WON any lawsuit you have ever filed.

Oh, that's right - you can't because you haven't.

So sad to be u.

--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language

Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
no comments
Re: gordy roy parker is NOT a lawyer and he does NOT know shit about the law!         


Author: Krus T. Olfard
Date: Aug 7, 2008 18:09

gordy roy parker of the fairfax dump parkers, newszoon and legal buffoon,
took a break from cleaning the fairfax dump parking lot around the
refrigerator box and posted:
>
> The previous poster is not an attorney, and likely doesn't expect
> anyone to take what he says as meaningful in the legal sense.
>
>

The only difference between the above statement and what you do is that
you demand that everyone take what you say as meaningful, even when it is
obvious you have absolutely no knowledge of the law.

See, gordy roy, you are NOT a lawyer and you HAVE been told by more than
one judge that you don't know shit about the law... mind you, they said
it nicer but that was the meaning of what they said.

gordy roy parker is NOT a lawyer and he does NOT know shit about the law!

--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
Show full article (1.13Kb)
no comments
Re: Parker v. Sloan: Parker's pleadings filed 08/07/08         


Author: Alfred E. Neumann
Date: Aug 7, 2008 20:45

"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:14idnYoaoelyHAbVnZ2dnUVZ_r3inZ2d@pghconnect.com:
>> So far, Parker has lost every lawsuit he has ever filed.
>
> That is incorrect by a lot.
>
> Further, when people begin targeting someone because they lost
> activist lawsuits that were attempts to resolve new law, it's not the
> same thing.
>

What does this have to do with you, Ray? You are a bitter egoist, not an
activist.

By the way, could you explain how you arrive at the figures you sue for
in your suits, ranging from mere millions to billions of dollars? Do you
throw dice for that or do you consult a tide table? Certainly looks like
that.
> I also had a USCF insider literally drop the evidence for this one
> into my lap.
>
Show full article (2.21Kb)
no comments