Author: Thom E. GeigerThom E. Geiger Date: Sep 6, 2008 23:39
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:16:30 -0700 (PDT), RayGordon
cybersheet.com> wrote:
>>> Does this mean the court found that service was valid, and it had
>>> jurisdiction over the defendants?
>>
>> No, it did not. It dismissed your motions regarding service as "moot".- Hide quoted text -
>
>Actually, it DID do just that, because without jurisdiction, or
>service, it would not have had to explore further.
>
>Also, the court is taking the view that the deficiencies are curable
>with an amended complaint.
Bullshit. Quote where the court states your deficiencies ARE curable,
Parker. Every court that has thrown your frivolous SLAPP serial
litigation attempts on the garbage pile where they belong has given
you the chance to correct the deficiencies IF YOU CAN/COULD, which you
are never able to do.
| 
