> On May 4, 11:20 am, "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com>
> wrote:>>> On May 4, 9:39 am, "Krus T. Olfard"
odor.com> wrote:>>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote
>>>> innews:481dd3dc$0$3367$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:>>
>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:OedTj.999$ah4.759@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...>>
>>>>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote in message
>>>>>>news:481d59da$0$5127$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>>
>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:091cc1db-0ef8-4996-85ce-e5750f4a53c1@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> ... On May 3, 10:33 pm, "HeeroYuy" wrote:>>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> message>>
>>>>>>>>news:42c8a08f-23df-4024-a8c9-13ba3f279be3@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>>> om... On May 3, 8:31 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:>>
>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>> 54a452db-7454-4d96-88fa-0e1c2eaa7...@
v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>>>>> Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 8:57
>>>>>>>>> PM:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 5:50 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>> 9182f408-4bb9-4f2c-a40f-ee2677bb4...@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>>>>>> om, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 7:30
>>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 4:24 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 032ecd6a-2ee7-4fb7-9872-34d938d86...@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com, Grizzlie Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on 5/3/08 5:27
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 1:07 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c436d89d-82f6-49ad-b007-525c4ce1d...@l28g2000prd.googlegrou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ps.com, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2:09 PM:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 1, 10:22 am, "R. Steve Walz"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
armory.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 30, 12:02 am, "R. Steve Walz"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
armory.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC (Nitghtline) did a story on this yesterday.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apprently, the Ychromosome does not repair itself,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and is getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressively weaker. Also apparently, we are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twenty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or fewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from female-female pregnancies caused by a process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that occurs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other species. They've already done this with mice.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems the ability to give birth is the deciding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factor in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which women will eventually "win" and literally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherit the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something else I've realized is that in 125,000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally taken over our own evolution and genetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering ourselves to be whatever we want. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either both the notions of male and female will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or that we will all have penises and vaginas if we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children may be created without use of a parent's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body, perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raised in artificial uteri or hatched out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genetically engineered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "eggs". Myself I have always liked the idea of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four legs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four arms and great big genitals.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the notion that men will be "extinct" at that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is sort
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unimaginative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For most women, it's wishful thinking.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you've never even met "most women".
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most women are either openly or secretly in love with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penises.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Lorena Bobbitt. I read about "most women" when I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lorena Bobbitt.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what kind of women you know, but all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appalled by Lorena Bobbitt.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Why didn't she just leave him?" is what I heard from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever heard them talk when they thought that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neither you nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any other man was around?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, I have.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Drilling a hole in the wall of the women's locker room
>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't really
>>>>>>>>>>> count.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> The opportunity to watch you remove your tampons isn't enough
>>>>>>>>>> of an incentive to try.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Again, still not a woman.
>>
>>>>>>>>> I know you're confused but I've told you twice now.
>>>>>>>>> I'd forgotten what a solemn and binding trust your word was.
>>>>>>>>> That having been said, you ARE a woman.
>>
>>>>>>>> And what makes you believe that erroneous assertion?
>>
>>>>>>>>It's not erroneous. My definition of what a "woman" is is broad
>>>>>>>>enough to encompass Alix.
>>
>>>>>>> And what, praytell, is your definition of a woman?
>>
>>>>>> How many screen names do you have, by the way?
>>
>>>>> Just this one. Why?
>>
>>>>>> My definition of a "woman" is broad enough to include
>>>>>> testosterone-deficient males who suck up to women.
>>
>>>>> Respecting women is not the same as sucking up to them. That you
>>>>> can't
>>>>> see the difference is no one's problem but your own.
>>
>>>> Shows you why women talk about him the way he claims they talk about
>>>> him.
>>>> And like gordy roy he interprets how women react to him as being how
>>>> they
>>>> react to men.
>>>> Pathetic, really...
>>
>>>> --
>>>> I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
>>>> not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then
>>>> send
>>>> me money.
>>
>>>> The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
>>
>>>> Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
>>>> public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
>>
>>> Oh jeeze, I don't believe I read this whole thread.
>>
>>> I don't get it GA, how is it you attract all these asshole feminists
>>> here?
>>
>> I don't know. Maybe that's a reason why I shouldn't contribute here.
>
> Heck no. You're too good of an anti-feminist not to participate in
> our struggles. We have some policy disagreements, but heh, who
> doesn't?
Heh-heh. Good old Smitty.
Always either patting me on the back or clutching my throat .
>> On the other hand, I might deserve an assist for driving Parg away.
>
> You bet and that assist was nothing compared to the coup we; you, me
> and the other guys, pulled off here having an agency of a national
> government, the feminist SOW's of Canada, trying to shut us down
> internationally. I couldn't have dreamed of a better way of drawing
> out the feminists to show what a fascist international group they
> really are and the power they think they have.
Did that really happen?
>> My revelation that the self-styled rich and successful businesswoman who
>> had
>> sold her business and retired in luxury on an enchanted tropical isle was
>> really a recently-licensed penny-ante real estate agent who was living in
>> a
>> trailer park and helping to rent senior apartment units in Desert Hot
>> Springs might have been a little too much for her.
>
> Apparently it was. We all thank you.
Heh-heh. You're welcome.
And what happened to Mange? Did she go away before someone dropped a house
on her?
>>> Who the heck are these people
>>
>> People?
>
> Well, Tim Men and Women.
>
>>> or maybe I should say sock
>>> puppets?
>>
>>> In conclusion, GA is right, women by nature are defensive toward men
>>> and will kill them if given the chance. 35 years of mandated sexual
>>> equality has proven it.
>>
>> Of course.
>>
>>> Any man who can't see it and supports these
>>> feminists deserves some pretty harsh conduct for using women to
>>> oppress other men. Let's hope God has something good in mind for
>>> them.
>>
>>> Smitty
>>
>> I am pretty sure that He does. I am confident that He does. My
>> religious
>> convictions are very confusing. On some days, I don't have any and I
>> question whether God exists in the first place. On other days, I am
>> confident that God's ways can be reconciled with man's on some level in
>> some
>> way and that there is more justice in the next world than in this one.
>>
>> Or as Russell Kirk, philosopher and story-teller, says in "Lex Talionis",
>> "Hereafter was everything. Without that prospect, all life would have
>> been
>> a nasty joke and men like Butte the natural lords of life. Yet the Lord
>> is
>> not mocked, and vengeance is His alone."
>>
>> I suppose that all of us will have to account for SOMETHING some day, but
>> all of us don't have to carry the ugly sin of feminism around like one of
>> Jacob Marley's chains.
>
> Don't worry, God exists and He's all over this issue. His time is
> coming... well that is for all to see AND hear. These particular
> feminists don't seem too stupid or cruel. They'll heed Him when the
> time comes or at least withdraw from doing any harm.
>
> Welcome back GA.
Thank you.
> I always love reading your posts when they aren't on
> certain issues.
>
> Tom
Oh well, we'll see.
