"HeeroYuy"
wrote in message
news:481e0665$0$31747$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>
> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:q8nTj.8417$iK6.7153@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...>>> On May 4, 9:39 am, "Krus T. Olfard"
odor.com> wrote:>>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote
>>>> innews:481dd3dc$0$3367$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:OedTj.999$ah4.759@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...>>>>
>>>>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote in message
>>>>>>news:481d59da$0$5127$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>>>>
>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:091cc1db-0ef8-4996-85ce-e5750f4a53c1@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> ... On May 3, 10:33 pm, "HeeroYuy" wrote:>>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message>>>>
>>>>>>>>news:42c8a08f-23df-4024-a8c9-13ba3f279be3@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>>> om... On May 3, 8:31 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>> 54a452db-7454-4d96-88fa-0e1c2eaa7...@
v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>>>>> Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 8:57 PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 5:50 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>> 9182f408-4bb9-4f2c-a40f-ee2677bb4...@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>>>>>> om, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 7:30
>>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 4:24 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 032ecd6a-2ee7-4fb7-9872-34d938d86...@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com, Grizzlie Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on 5/3/08 5:27
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 1:07 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c436d89d-82f6-49ad-b007-525c4ce1d...@l28g2000prd.googlegrou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ps.com, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2:09 PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 1, 10:22 am, "R. Steve Walz"
armory.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 30, 12:02 am, "R. Steve Walz"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
armory.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC (Nitghtline) did a story on this yesterday.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apprently, the Ychromosome does not repair itself,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and is getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressively weaker. Also apparently, we are twenty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or fewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from female-female pregnancies caused by a process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that occurs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other species. They've already done this with mice.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems the ability to give birth is the deciding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factor in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which women will eventually "win" and literally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherit the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something else I've realized is that in 125,000 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally taken over our own evolution and genetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering ourselves to be whatever we want. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either both the notions of male and female will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or that we will all have penises and vaginas if we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children may be created without use of a parent's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body, perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raised in artificial uteri or hatched out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genetically engineered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "eggs". Myself I have always liked the idea of having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four legs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four arms and great big genitals.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the notion that men will be "extinct" at that time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is sort
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unimaginative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For most women, it's wishful thinking.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you've never even met "most women".
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most women are either openly or secretly in love with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penises.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Lorena Bobbitt. I read about "most women" when I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lorena Bobbitt.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what kind of women you know, but all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appalled by Lorena Bobbitt.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Why didn't she just leave him?" is what I heard from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever heard them talk when they thought that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neither you nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any other man was around?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, I have.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Drilling a hole in the wall of the women's locker room
>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't really
>>>>>>>>>>> count.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The opportunity to watch you remove your tampons isn't enough
>>>>>>>>>> of an incentive to try.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Again, still not a woman.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know you're confused but I've told you twice now.
>>>>>>>>> I'd forgotten what a solemn and binding trust your word was.
>>>>>>>>> That having been said, you ARE a woman.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> And what makes you believe that erroneous assertion?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's not erroneous. My definition of what a "woman" is is broad
>>>>>>>>enough to encompass Alix.
>>>>
>>>>>>> And what, praytell, is your definition of a woman?
>>>>
>>>>>> How many screen names do you have, by the way?
>>>>
>>>>> Just this one. Why?
>>>>
>>>>>> My definition of a "woman" is broad enough to include
>>>>>> testosterone-deficient males who suck up to women.
>>>>
>>>>> Respecting women is not the same as sucking up to them. That you
>>>>> can't
>>>>> see the difference is no one's problem but your own.
>>>>
>>>> Shows you why women talk about him the way he claims they talk about
>>>> him.
>>>> And like gordy roy he interprets how women react to him as being how
>>>> they
>>>> react to men.
>>>> Pathetic, really...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
>>>> not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then
>>>> send
>>>> me money.
>>>>
>>>> The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
>>>>
>>>> Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
>>>> public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
>>>
>>> Oh jeeze, I don't believe I read this whole thread.
>>>
>>> I don't get it GA, how is it you attract all these asshole feminists
>>> here?
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know. Maybe that's a reason why I shouldn't contribute here.
>>
>> On the other hand, I might deserve an assist for driving Parg away.
>>
>> My revelation that the self-styled rich and successful businesswoman who
>> had sold her business and retired in luxury on an enchanted tropical isle
>> was really a recently-licensed penny-ante real estate agent who was
>> living in a trailer park and helping to rent senior apartment units in
>> Desert Hot Springs might have been a little too much for her.
>>
>>
>>> Who the heck are these people
>>
>>
>> People?
>
> Yes, people. As in more than one person.
You mean, as in members of the human race?
>>> or maybe I should say sock
>>> puppets?
>>>
>>> In conclusion, GA is right, women by nature are defensive toward men
>>> and will kill them if given the chance. 35 years of mandated sexual
>>> equality has proven it.
>>
>>
>> Of course.
>
> That would be a great way to make humans extinct.
In the first place, women just hate men and want them dead. The long term
consequences of this don't interest them.
In the second place, to the extent that women ARE thinking long term, they
are thinking about reproduction by parthogenesis or in a laboratory or
whatever.
That's why we HAVE Oxford professors talking about the extinction of men in
the first place, which is what this thread was originally about.
Oxford professors and others are talking about the extinction of men because
it's all about what women want.
> I find it funny that you take a few extreme examples and make it the rule,
> instead of the exception.
Nonsense. There is obviously a large market for the extinction of men or
the subject wouldn't come up repeatedly.
>>> Any man who can't see it and supports these
>>> feminists deserves some pretty harsh conduct for using women to
>>> oppress other men. Let's hope God has something good in mind for
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Smitty
>>
>>
>> I am pretty sure that He does. I am confident that He does. My
>> religious convictions are very confusing. On some days, I don't have any
>> and I question whether God exists in the first place. On other days, I
>> am confident that God's ways can be reconciled with man's on some level
>> in some way and that there is more justice in the next world than in this
>> one.
>>
>> Or as Russell Kirk, philosopher and story-teller, says in "Lex Talionis",
>> "Hereafter was everything. Without that prospect, all life would have
>> been a nasty joke and men like Butte the natural lords of life. Yet the
>> Lord is not mocked, and vengeance is His alone."
>>
>> I suppose that all of us will have to account for SOMETHING some day, but
>> all of us don't have to carry the ugly sin of feminism around like one of
>> Jacob Marley's chains.
>
> There are women, there are feminists, and then there are feminazis. Unlike
> you, I can differentiate between the three.
What? That's like saying that you can differentiate between root beer and
sarsaparilla. It's like saying that you can tell the difference between
shrimp and prawns.
> Guess which ones you all keep bumping into?
Sometimes the menu says "shrimp". Sometimes the menu says "prawns". Always
tastes the same to me.
> If you all keep believing that all women are feminazis, that's all you'll
> ever meet.
If you keep believing that shrimp taste different than prawns, your taste
buds will respond to words on a menu, but you'll really only be fooling
yourself.
> Y'all are no better than the misandrists (man-haters) at NOW.
Prawns! Worse yet, women!
> Also, claiming to speak for God, or that He will reign your personal sense
> of justice on those who don't blindly agree with your points of view is a
> sign of insanity.
Do you want to hear my crazy laugh?
> That said, you have to be some the most miserable people I have ever come
> across.
Who are the others and where do we rank?
(doing my best Salieri imitation) Can you remember no melody of mine? I was
the most famous composer in Europe. I wrote 40 operas alone.
