On May 4, 11:20 am, "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com>
wrote:>> On May 4, 9:39 am, "Krus T. Olfard"
odor.com> wrote:>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote
>>> innews:481dd3dc$0$3367$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:>
>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:OedTj.999$ah4.759@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...>
>>>>> "HeeroYuy"
wrote in message
>>>>>news:481d59da$0$5127$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...>
>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:091cc1db-0ef8-4996-85ce-e5750f4a53c1@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com
>>>>>> ... On May 3, 10:33 pm, "HeeroYuy" wrote:>>>>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist"
yahoo.com> wrote in message>
>>>>>>>news:42c8a08f-23df-4024-a8c9-13ba3f279be3@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>> om... On May 3, 8:31 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>> 54a452db-7454-4d96-88fa-0e1c2eaa7...@
v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>>>> Grizzlie
>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 8:57 PM:
>
>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 5:50 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>> 9182f408-4bb9-4f2c-a40f-ee2677bb4...@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.c
>>>>>>>>>> om, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08 7:30
>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 4:24 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>> 032ecd6a-2ee7-4fb7-9872-34d938d86...@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.
>>>>>>>>>>>> com, Grizzlie Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> on 5/3/08 5:27
>>>>>>>>>>>> PM:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 3, 1:07 pm, Alex
nyc.NOSPAM.rr.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c436d89d-82f6-49ad-b007-525c4ce1d...@l28g2000prd.googlegrou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ps.com, Grizzlie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antagonist at lloydsofhanf...@
yahoo.com wrote on 5/3/08
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2:09 PM:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 1, 10:22 am, "R. Steve Walz"
armory.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 30, 12:02 am, "R. Steve Walz"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
armory.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC (Nitghtline) did a story on this yesterday.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apprently, the Ychromosome does not repair itself,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and is getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressively weaker. Also apparently, we are twenty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or fewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from female-female pregnancies caused by a process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that occurs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other species. They've already done this with mice.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems the ability to give birth is the deciding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factor in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which women will eventually "win" and literally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherit the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something else I've realized is that in 125,000 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally taken over our own evolution and genetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering ourselves to be whatever we want. It could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either both the notions of male and female will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or that we will all have penises and vaginas if we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children may be created without use of a parent's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body, perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raised in artificial uteri or hatched out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genetically engineered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "eggs". Myself I have always liked the idea of having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four legs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four arms and great big genitals.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the notion that men will be "extinct" at that time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is sort
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unimaginative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For most women, it's wishful thinking.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you've never even met "most women".
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most women are either openly or secretly in love with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penises.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Lorena Bobbitt. I read about "most women" when I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lorena Bobbitt.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what kind of women you know, but all the ones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appalled by Lorena Bobbitt.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Why didn't she just leave him?" is what I heard from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever heard them talk when they thought that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neither you nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any other man was around?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you?
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, I have.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Drilling a hole in the wall of the women's locker room
>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't really
>>>>>>>>>> count.
>
>>>>>>>>> The opportunity to watch you remove your tampons isn't enough
>>>>>>>>> of an incentive to try.
>
>>>>>>>> Again, still not a woman.
>
>>>>>>>> I know you're confused but I've told you twice now.
>>>>>>>> I'd forgotten what a solemn and binding trust your word was.
>>>>>>>> That having been said, you ARE a woman.
>
>>>>>>> And what makes you believe that erroneous assertion?
>
>>>>>>>It's not erroneous. My definition of what a "woman" is is broad
>>>>>>>enough to encompass Alix.
>
>>>>>> And what, praytell, is your definition of a woman?
>
>>>>> How many screen names do you have, by the way?
>
>>>> Just this one. Why?
>
>>>>> My definition of a "woman" is broad enough to include
>>>>> testosterone-deficient males who suck up to women.
>
>>>> Respecting women is not the same as sucking up to them. That you can't
>>>> see the difference is no one's problem but your own.
>
>>> Shows you why women talk about him the way he claims they talk about him.
>>> And like gordy roy he interprets how women react to him as being how they
>>> react to men.
>>> Pathetic, really...
>
>>> --
>>> I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
>>> not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
>>> me money.
>
>>> The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
>
>>> Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
>>> public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
>
>> Oh jeeze, I don't believe I read this whole thread.
>
>> I don't get it GA, how is it you attract all these asshole feminists
>> here?
>
> I don't know. Maybe that's a reason why I shouldn't contribute here.
Heck no. You're too good of an anti-feminist not to participate in
our struggles. We have some policy disagreements, but heh, who
doesn't?
> On the other hand, I might deserve an assist for driving Parg away.
You bet and that assist was nothing compared to the coup we; you, me
and the other guys, pulled off here having an agency of a national
government, the feminist SOW's of Canada, trying to shut us down
internationally. I couldn't have dreamed of a better way of drawing
out the feminists to show what a fascist international group they
really are and the power they think they have.
> My revelation that the self-styled rich and successful businesswoman who had
> sold her business and retired in luxury on an enchanted tropical isle was
> really a recently-licensed penny-ante real estate agent who was living in a
> trailer park and helping to rent senior apartment units in Desert Hot
> Springs might have been a little too much for her.
Apparently it was. We all thank you.
>> Who the heck are these people
>
> People?
Well, Tim Men and Women.
>> or maybe I should say sock
>> puppets?
>
>> In conclusion, GA is right, women by nature are defensive toward men
>> and will kill them if given the chance. 35 years of mandated sexual
>> equality has proven it.
>
> Of course.
>
>> Any man who can't see it and supports these
>> feminists deserves some pretty harsh conduct for using women to
>> oppress other men. Let's hope God has something good in mind for
>> them.
>
>> Smitty
>
> I am pretty sure that He does. I am confident that He does. My religious
> convictions are very confusing. On some days, I don't have any and I
> question whether God exists in the first place. On other days, I am
> confident that God's ways can be reconciled with man's on some level in some
> way and that there is more justice in the next world than in this one.
>
> Or as Russell Kirk, philosopher and story-teller, says in "Lex Talionis",
> "Hereafter was everything. Without that prospect, all life would have been
> a nasty joke and men like Butte the natural lords of life. Yet the Lord is
> not mocked, and vengeance is His alone."
>
> I suppose that all of us will have to account for SOMETHING some day, but
> all of us don't have to carry the ugly sin of feminism around like one of
> Jacob Marley's chains.
Don't worry, God exists and He's all over this issue. His time is
coming... well that is for all to see AND hear. These particular
feminists don't seem too stupid or cruel. They'll heed Him when the
time comes or at least withdraw from doing any harm.
Welcome back GA. I always love reading your posts when they aren't on
certain issues.
Tom
