Re: Our boy, Gordon, is not only a legal genius, but he knows economics, too!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Our boy, Gordon, is not only a legal genius, but he knows economics, too!         

Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: Vance
Date: Aug 26, 2008 17:08

On Aug 26, 3:14 pm, "E.C Smith" way.com> wrote:
> "The Evil Tessmacher" ya.hoo.com> wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> E.C Smith writes...
>
>>> "Odious" cox.net.nospam> wrote
>
>>>>> Are you suggesting that "evil Whitey"
>>>>> stole the knowledge out of their brains
>>>>> and they haven't been able to get it back?
>
>>>> Actually, yeah... that's how imperial
>>>> control works.  Controlling education.
>>>> It only takes a few decades to virtually
>>>> eradicate literacy from a population, let
>>>> alone knowledge of how to build a nation.
>
>>> Can you provide an approximate date for when
>>> this "irradication of literacy" took place
>>> in Africa and which nation implemeted it?
>
>> No more than you can provide any legitimate
>> scientific studies that support your erroneous
>> contentions.
>
>> Oh, wait...
>
>> Great Britain, France, Germany, The Netherlands,
>> Denmark, Prussia, Belgium, Austria-Hungary,
>> Spain, and Portugal, in the 17th 18th and early
>> 19th centuries.
>
> As far as I know, Africans were living in tribes as hunter/gatherers with a
> bit of subsistence farming thrown in at those times you mentioned.
>
> Do you have any specific references that prove otherwise
>
>
>
>> Game. Set. Match.
>
>> You can shut up now.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

As far as you know is not getting anyone very far, including youself.
Your using Rushton as an authority is an example. He is still working
on the inverse relationship between penis and brain size, or maybe
he's given up on that.

Did you know that the brain size of the Neanderthals was considerably
larger than that of Homo Sapien Sapien's? What happened to them?
Obviously a stupider animal than they were (indicated by brain size)
was more successful than they were. Maybe Homo Sapien Sapien was just
to stupid to realize that they were outclassed and just got on with
living. Ya think?

In several studies, racists show a mean IQ 4 points lower than the
average American white person? (Montagu 1952 & 1988, Allport 1946,
Frenkel-Brunswick and Sanford 1945) and the way you present your
'cause' does nothing to contradict the studies.

I have already presented the time frame for several historical high
level societies in Africa over the period of time that TET mentions
and I ignored East Africa. The information on African History is
available and even with your IQ being 4 points lower than average
(your white and your racist and the studies say you ain't to bright)
you should be able to find some of it. Of some special importance is
the effect of the slave trade on Africa in the 17th and 18th Centuries
and the sociological factors that came into play. You will need to
pay attention to how non-state based societies were vulnerable to
state based colonizing societies. Given the structural differences in
societies and the different development in the underlying human
relationships which were the foundations for each, the results for
Africa logically follow. Genetics doesn't play a role.

While European where trying to figure out how to do math with Roman
Numerals, they had developed Algebra and were using the concept of
zero in Northern Africa. They also had made advances in medicine,
astronomy and architecture. This was the reason that the best
educated Europeans went to Africa to study and returned to Europe - to
enlighten them. Also, the concept of universities waw developed there
and have carried through to the present. In Spain, Muslim's
revolutionized agriculture in Granada with new irrigation techniques
brought over from Northern Africa and the introduction of crops
appropriate to the climate.

As far as taking two or three generations to recover from a decline in
education, which you mention in another post, you have several hundred
years where Europe didn't recover at all. If you look at the what
happened in Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire (circa 476),
everything was due to what society degenerated to and had nothing to
do with the intelligence of the Europeans. They didn't become
instantly stupid, but the remained pretty damned ignorant for 1,000
years. By the way, if you think that Africa was where the impact of
state based societies on non-state based societies is the only place
it shows up, you'd be wrong. You can look at the rise of the
essentially modern state and the effects it had in Europe between 1500
& 1700. It's also interesting to look at the the end of The Holy
Roman Empire and the influences which kept Germany from becoming a
state until the 1800's. The Byzantine Empire, which was not white
European, managed to carry on for 1,000 years after the fall of the
the Roman Empire.

You are very good at saying 'Yeah? Well what about this?' over and
over again. You are a total failure at addressing anything. Now, the
saying is that 'Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
different results is the definition of insanity', but it's just as
valid to say that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a
different result defines stupid. With the IQ of a racist (4 points or
so less than normal) and your constantly repeating the same thing over
and over, I'm afraid that you seem to be stupid. That's to bad.
Ignorance is curable, but not when you're to stupid to learn. Damn
them genes!!

That's enough for now. I was just waiting for the coffee to brew
before I went back to work.

Vance
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!