|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: RayGordonRayGordon Date: Sep 9, 2008 14:41
In a perfect example of online business synergy, Google has announced
the purchase of ReputationDefender, the online company devoted to
helping people repair their cyber-reputation.
"This is an amazing breakthrough," said a Google spokesperson. "As we
all know, Google causes 99.9 percent of the damage to someone's
reputation to begin with, because we can't be sued for archiving it in
our search engine, even though Google is the only reason most people
would find the defamation in the first place. I mean, someone gets
defamed on a board with a dozen people reading, no one would notice,
but when they search the target by name, it comes right up for anyone
snooping. What this means is the need for sites like
ReputationDefender will never go away."
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: HCHC Date: Sep 9, 2008 14:59
On Sep 9, 5:41�pm, RayGordon cybersheet.com> wrote:> In a perfect example of online business synergy, Google has announced
> the purchase of ReputationDefender, the online company devoted to
> helping people repair their cyber-reputation.
>
> "This is an amazing breakthrough," said a Google spokesperson. �"As we
> all know, Google causes 99.9 percent of the damage to someone's
> reputation to begin with, because we can't be sued for archiving it in
> our search engine, even though Google is the only reason most people
> would find the defamation in the first place. �I mean, someone gets
> defamed on a board with a dozen people reading, no one would notice,
> but when they search the target by name, it comes right up for anyone
> snooping. � What this means is the need for sites like
> ReputationDefender will never go away."
>
> Google was also optimistic about the growth of ReputationDefender,
> because, as the spokesperson pointed out, "only a fraction of people
> really use Google to snoop into others' lives. �In the next decade, we
> expect that percentage to increaes sharply. �Even fewer people have
> mastered the art of google-bombing people, or using Google as a ...
|
| Show full article (2.97Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ZFORCEZFORCE Date: Sep 9, 2008 16:24
>>
>
> (note: this is parody)
>
Finally, Gordita admits she makes shit up, just like allegations in her
k00ks00ts.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: corkycorky Date: Sep 9, 2008 19:54
> In a perfect example of online business synergy, Google has announced
> the purchase of ReputationDefender, the online company devoted to
> helping people repair their cyber-reputation.
>
> "This is an amazing breakthrough," said a Google spokesperson. "As we
> all know, Google causes 99.9 percent of the damage to someone's
> reputation to begin with, because we can't be sued for archiving it in
> our search engine, even though Google is the only reason most people
> would find the defamation in the first place. I mean, someone gets
> defamed on a board with a dozen people reading, no one would notice,
> but when they search the target by name, it comes right up for anyone
> snooping. What this means is the need for sites like
> ReputationDefender will never go away."
>
> Google was also optimistic about the growth of ReputationDefender,
> because, as the spokesperson pointed out, "only a fraction of people
> really use Google to snoop into others' lives. In the next decade, we
> expect that percentage to increaes sharply. Even fewer people have ...
|
| Show full article (1.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ThurdustThurdust Date: Sep 10, 2008 12:59
On Sep 9, 4:41Â pm, RayGordon cybersheet.com> wrote:> In a perfect example of online business synergy, Google has announced
> the purchase of ReputationDefender, the online company devoted to
> helping people repair their cyber-reputation.
Does this mean that I won't be able to do a Google image search for
"Nikki Catsouras" anymore?
> "This is an amazing breakthrough," said a Google spokesperson. Â "As we
> all know, Google causes 99.9 percent of the damage to someone's
> reputation to begin with, because we can't be sued for archiving it in
> our search engine, even though Google is the only reason most people
> would find the defamation in the first place. Â I mean, someone gets
> defamed on a board with a dozen people reading, no one would notice,
> but when they search the target by name, it comes right up for anyone
> snooping. Â What this means is the need for sites like
> ReputationDefender will never go away."
From what I understand, all Reputation Defender does is send letters
to people asking them to take stuff down, causing the recipients of
said letters to ignore said letters.
|
| Show full article (2.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Sep 10, 2008 15:46
>
> And what happened to your .sig?
>
I suspect the tard got spanked.
--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
---------------------------------|
| At my age a woman's mind should |
| be more important than her body.|
|---------------------------------|
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
