On Feb 19, 11:27 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Ray, the results of that study simply replicate the results of other
studies going back decades for the formal studies and over a thousand
years (maybe thousands) for the 'empirical studies' of men in
general. As you usually are, you're way behind the curve and as
always (a higher standard that usually) mentally a dollar short. As
all studies of a population do, it represents a central bias or
tendency across the population without any input from the outside. In
other words, it assumes a closed system. However, we aren't closed
systems and therefore personal interractions are not necessarily the
results of a closed system, though they can be.

A niave population, and I am using the term technically and correctly,
will always give you a baseline. That's what they are for. However,
in terms of becoming a PUA, or just more successful at seduction, a
person will learn those things that are operative and positively
influence a particular encounter. That changes everything. What you
are so hot about is an initial condition of attraction of the niave
for the niave.

Nobody has ever claimed that looks didn't matter, except of course
you, when you claim it is all about 'assets' or whatever burr is up
your butt at the moment. The claim has always been that looks are not
as supremely important and determinative as you believe and far less
important to seduction that many think. Seduction on the ground is a
game of individuals interracting. You can't seem to get that concept
to even occupy the small pointed part of your head because there isn't
any room left with all the delusional shit it's filled with.

The game isn't over. For those, like you, that don't know how to
play, there isn't any game so don't worry about it. For everone else,
there is learning and perfecting how to effectively interract with
other people, seduction being a subset of that.