On Jul 29, 1:22Â pm, Alex
gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 5:53 pm, An Old Friend
friend.invalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Â HC aol.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 27, 3:25?pm, "Odious" cox.net.nospam> wrote:
>>>> "Alex"
gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>>>>> On Jul 26, 7:00 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of absolutely nothing"
>>>>> cybersheet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> \Note how the previous posters deliberately ignore stuff like that while
>>>>>> attempting to play USENET doc.
>
>>>>> Only a narcissist would even attempt to compare the situations.
>
>>>>> Mystery realized he needed help and sought it out. That's something to
>>>>> be lauded.
>
>>>>> As opposed to your actions, fr00t l00p. Ducking a court-mandated psych
>>>>> evaluation. To the point of paying $1000 contempt fine.
>
>>>>> What is it you're so afraid the doctors will learn about you, fr00t
>>>>> l00p?
>
>>>> What's even more telling is why gordita thinks that anything Mystery does
>>>> somehow excuses or lessens gordo's behavior.
>
>>>> Mystery could be out on Las Vegas Blvd fucking a goat dressed like a
>>>> showgirl, and it wouldn't change what gordon has said or done, one bit.
>
>>>> So why does gordo keep hiding behind Mystery?
>
>>> Maybe because he doesn't have "Baseball Bat Penny the Skull Crusher's"
>>> skirt to hide behind anymore?
>
>>> LOL . . . I just had a visual of him WEARING her skirt . . . Â I can
>>> only imagine what goes on in that apartment if she's really gone.
>
>> He doesn't live in that apartment anymore. He couldn't afford the rent
>> on a 2 bedroom apartment, so he lives in a studio in the same building
>> without any kitchen facilities (but the roaches are free).
>
>> Kind of puts the lie to his statements that he was the one providing for
>> his family ... obviously *she* was paying the rent and she was the one
>> supporting Mr. Parker.
>
>> I honestly hope Mr. Parker gets sanctions that he can't pay and is
>> incarcerated before he becomes homeless and a *real* threat to the young
>> women who attend the University of Pennsylvania. It wouldn't surprise me
>> if that was enough for him for finally follow through on his expressed
>> desires to throw women "six feet under" for treating him like a
>> "loser"--and then claiming that they somehow deserved it.
>> ** Posted
fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
>
> I had thought about this too.
>
> Once he's sanctioned and his internet access is restricted, I figure
> he'll become a danger to himself and others. Perhaps commitment is a
> better solution than incarceration.
I am way retired now as a therapist, but here in California, I don't
see how he could even be 5150'd (our code for a 72 psych hold) let
alone committed. Other jurisdictions are pretty much the same. There
isn't really any reliable metric for whether or not he could become a
danger. Only a treating psych who knows Gordon well could get him
5150'd and for that to go any further there would have to be a
concurring assessment from the facility psych staff that he presented
a present or nearly immediate danger to himself or others.
Without the buffer against some aspects of life that living with Penny
presented and the stressor that having no internet access would be, it
is reasonable that Gordon would act in some way, but what way? He
could collapse in on himself and just degenerate; he could become
postal and strike out at people who symbolize those responsible for
his situation (women, primarily), or he could go on in a variation of
how he is now, maybe intensified, because he is at the limits of what
he is behaviorally capable of. It's a crap shoot.
Vance