| Re: More whining from the Court Jester |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Apr 19, 2007 23:57
>> Access to the courts is a constitutional liberty.
>>
>> --
>> Ray Gordon, Author
>
> Yes, access to the courts is a Constitutionally guranteed right.
> However, the courts also have the affirmative right to bar someone
> from filing frivolous and repetetive actions, not to mention using the
> courts for vindictive purposes, as any paralegal would know.
Subjectivity and censorship don't mix. Each new case still has to be
evaluated by a court, lest anyone overplay their hand and give someone too
strong a case.
Losing a case doesn't make the case frivolous. In my Google case, for
example, Google has chosen to sidestep the basic fair-use question and
instead argued against standing. There's no way in the world a court would
not let me bring a future lawsuit where it found I did have standing.
--
Ray Gordon, Author
Price And Probability (The Value Handicapper's Bible)
http://www.cybersheet.com/horsepix.html
Would someone PLEASE become Ashlee Schull's new #1 fan? She deserves
better.
| 
