|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: OdiousOdious Date: Nov 13, 2006 08:24
"Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly" splat.net> wrote in message
news:4557c034$0$29163$88260bb3@unlimited.teranews.com...>
> "Ray Gordon, liar" cybersheet.com> ranted in message
> news:QJadnXKmqq2KMcrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@pghconnect.com...>>>His total legal experience, besides his kooksuits, is a temp job as a
>>>typist in a law office....
>>
>> "Teddybear" is lying again, as I've been a paralegal for lawyers in two
>> different states, as well as office and tech support.
>>
> Paralegal = Typist
>
> Support for the real professionals is all you could ever be, however you
> haven't bothered with that in a number of years have you? You think you
> know enough to win a case, and the truth is you can't even file a coherent
> pleading.
In the stae of PA, paralegals are certified.
Gordo has no certification on record with the state as far as I've found.
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BornnaturalBornnatural Date: Nov 13, 2006 09:26
"Odious" cox.net.nospam> wrote in message
news:%%_06h.669$PI1.658@newsfe23.lga...>
> "Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly" splat.net> wrote in message
> news:4557c034$0$29163$88260bb3@unlimited.teranews.com...>>
>> "Ray Gordon, liar" cybersheet.com> ranted in message
>> news:QJadnXKmqq2KMcrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@pghconnect.com...>>>>His total legal experience, besides his kooksuits, is a temp job as a
>>>>typist in a law office....
>>>
>>> "Teddybear" is lying again, as I've been a paralegal for lawyers in two
>>> different states, as well as office and tech support.
>>>
>> Paralegal = Typist
>>
>> Support for the real professionals is all you could ever be, however you
>> haven't bothered with that in a number of years have you? You think you
>> know enough to win a case, and the truth is you can't even file a
>> coherent pleading. ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Teddybear Loveable and CuddlyTeddybear Loveable and Cuddly Date: Nov 13, 2006 10:16
"Odious" cox.net.nospam> wrote in message
news:%%_06h.669$PI1.658@newsfe23.lga...>
> "Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly" splat.net> wrote in message
> news:4557c034$0$29163$88260bb3@unlimited.teranews.com...>>
>> "Ray Gordon, liar" cybersheet.com> ranted in message
>> news:QJadnXKmqq2KMcrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@pghconnect.com...>>>>His total legal experience, besides his kooksuits, is a temp job as a
>>>>typist in a law office....
>>>
>>> "Teddybear" is lying again, as I've been a paralegal for lawyers in two
>>> different states, as well as office and tech support.
>>>
>> Paralegal = Typist
>>
>> Support for the real professionals is all you could ever be, however you
>> haven't bothered with that in a number of years have you? You think you
>> know enough to win a case, and the truth is you can't even file a
>> coherent pleading. ...
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MI5-VictimMI5-Victim Date: Nov 29, 2006 21:58
Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group
In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
bugs. They found nothing.
I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video, surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be using.
I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping" devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
believe our neighbours would permit this.
We paid Nationwide
|
| |
| 79 Comments |
|
|
Author: Seeker1Seeker1 Date: Nov 30, 2006 08:14
> On 29-Nov-2006, Talented Old fart <098@ 123.con> wrote:
> >>>> WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way,
>>>> I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>>> they can stay the hell out of my threads.
>
> who the hell are Oedipus, Krusty and Tusky?
dwarfs 8, 9 and 10 - the ones Snow White didn't talk about
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: dracoznadracozna Date: Nov 30, 2006 10:38
>> On 29-Nov-2006, Talented Old fart <098@ 123.con> wrote:
>> >>>>> WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any
>>>>> way,
>>>>> I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>>>> they can stay the hell out of my threads.
>>
>> who the hell are Oedipus, Krusty and Tusky?
>
>
> dwarfs 8, 9 and 10 - the ones Snow White didn't talk about
Wasn't Krusty that clown in The Simpsons?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Paul RobinsonPaul Robinson Date: Dec 1, 2006 18:30
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>>>>What you seem unable to understand, it that not all women are alike.
>>>
>>>Exactly: the quality of a woman who agrees to an MLTR is inferior to one
>>>who does not.
>>>
>>>Most consider that self-evident.
>>
>>I know a number of women who are
>>Polyamorous, and they are extremely high quality people, as well as being
>>HBs.
>
>
> Produce them. It's VERY easy to produce high-quality HBs who believe in
> monogamy. Of course, if the guy can fuck other women, the women can fuck
> other guys, and then you just have a hookup.
A condition and state that you have been, are, and always will be,
unable to attain. You have, through your words, categorically proven
yourself incapable of obtaining any woman under any circumstances.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lola BananaLola Banana Date: Dec 1, 2006 21:23
dman wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 5:52 pm, Lola Banana wrote:
>
>>did I mention I have small children? ;)
>
> nope, but realised that already
It's a midlife crisis! ;P
Lola
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: scientificscientific Date: Dec 8, 2006 08:32
dracozna schrieb:
> Hello Jakobus, how comfortable are you around women? Because if i read
> your post you sound like you're comfortable around (gay) men but are
> nervous around women.
No. Sorry, that´s only partially right.
I feel comfortable with (gay) men, whith woman, with older and younger
man/woman. There is no Problem with woman for me.
The problem is: a beautyfull woman in a...
|
| Show full article (6.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Thom E. GeigerThom E. Geiger Date: Dec 17, 2006 07:18
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:46:53 -0500, "Ray Gordon" cybersheet.com>
wrote:
>>I just realized: Ray Gordon has not denied one of the afore mentioned
>> facts, nor has he debated anything of them.
>
>I have denied them, in federal lawsuits. The burden is on you to prove what
>you say is true, given the nature of what you're saying, not on me to refute
>every brain fart you have.
>
>Oh, another thing: anonymous harassment (which you are now engaging in)
>happens to be a FELONY.
>
>Just remember, YOU started this. I never did shit to you.
>
>
You are such a lying, whining hypocrite, Parker. And you think that
won't play out in a court some day? Go ahead, keep filling archives
with your hypocritical bullshit, just as you've filled it with
thousands...
|
| Show full article (3.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
