On wednesday I had a rough day, a delayed hangover from friday if you
would during which a bunch of things in my life fell apart. Oh, and
then when I got home in the evening I cut myself shaving. Yeah, it was
just that kind of day when all the big things and all the little
things seemed to be going wrong. In general I felt seriously pissed
off at the world (and [i]girls[/i] in particular). A VERY unusual
state for me when I'm normally so very cheerful and always in a happy
state, of course this fact just made me feel even more pissed off
because I knew this was not normal for me. (yet in a funny way I kind
of liked feeling pissed of for that evening, as it felt different and
new :D but certainly [i]not[/i] what I'd want my normal default state
to be like!)

Being in such a foul mood I decide it would be a bright idea to go off
to town! My flatmate agreed with me (but he was too sick to come
along), as he said it looked like I needed a night out in town. He
said I needed to get laid quick. But he said there is [b][i]no way you
are going to get laid tonight[/b][/i] because I was in such a foul
mood! (I was particularly upset against girls, all very odd for me. My
flatmate didn't recognise me at all!)

Even if the previous "lay report" is 100 percent true, it still leaves many
questions unanswered, as the guy could be undervaluing himself (getting laid
on looks, height, youth or money), overvaluing the chick (she might be a 6
and not a 9), etc. And that's assuming truth. Since it's unverifiable
internet props, the reader just has to trust.

This doesn't happen in other arenas. In chess, you can measure advice
against checkmate or a specific outcome. In sports or horse racing, one can
make their selections before the event, make the selection public, and the
results can be compared to the actual outcome.

Not so in seduction, since there is so much to HIDE, even in the best case
scenario. This is an inherent flaw in the internet and in seduction, as the
latter is subjective with a premium on discretion.

This is why the PUAs or the "community" never do well on talk shows. Women
don't want their selection process publicized, and once it is to the point
where men think they have the key, the women just change the lock.

--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru

Keep moving those goalposts, fr00t l00p.

First it's "Boo hoo, there are no lay reports." Then, one gets posted
and it's "Boo hoo, no one's giving me proof (also known as the info I
need to stalk her with)."

It's called credibility, fr00t l00p.

Some people have it.

YOU do not.

Your lack of credibility is directly attributed to your own actions.

Now you get to live with it.

Sucks (and blows) to be you, fr00t l00p.

On May 3, 4:44 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

gordy roy parker, not the creator of the \"pivot\" as he has admitted in
earlier posts and then lies with every current post and claims he is,
liar and newzloon and legal buffoon, whined:

On May 3, 8:44 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

I've posted before a youtube link of me with girls, they were hot
without a doubt. You can't get better proof than a video, without
actually coming over here in person to meet me and see what I can do
(of which you are perfectly welcome to do).

You say height like it is a good thing, believe me as a person who has
lived all his life being tall it is not all it is cracked up to be.
Sure it is advantages, but it has drawbacks like you appear initially
scarier as your are taller, and it is a hell of a lot harder to hear
what they are saying or kiss girls as they are all this little things
who are waaaaay below your own height.

On May 3, 8:59 pm, Alex gmail.com> wrote:

Exactly.

I'd even give him more proof if he came here, he could meet me fuck
buddies. He could even get their numbers if he asked for them from the
girls and they gave it to him. But I highly doubt they would give him
their contact details! hahaha, yeah but sure... go on try for it, and
get more info about them for stalking

as if