Author: What's it to you anyway...?What's it to you anyway...? Date: Jun 24, 2007 14:26
>It seems that big corporations and big law, have banded together in an
>attempt to destroy 47 USC §230(d), which immunizes "third party" publishers
>of internet content, to varying degrees depending on the lower-court
>precedent.
You are not a BC or a BL, and just jerk off to what they do..
Parker, you are a nothing, on the outside looking in..impotent..afraid..
>As was correctly noted earlier in this group, the trial attorneys see a big
>payday if they can remove this obstacle to suing deep-pocketed ISPs and
>other tech companies, almost all of whom have bet their existence on this
>immunity. Recently, the trial attorneys have acquired a new ally in the
>form of big business, which is getting sick of seeing the peasants it
>wage-enslaves being able to speak out, let alone anonymously, to the point
>where they cannot even be unmasked in a lawsuit, and where the websites to
>which they post cannot be sued.
The trouble with your issue is that everything you claim is defamed against you
IS your own words, your own posts, and *N*O*T*H*I*N*G* will change that. Face it..
..you are a child molester. I can claim that all day, and all of the night, and
your own words PROVE it. Sue me, coward. NO BB or "..world wide group of attorneys.."
you can dream up that can sue "..anybody, anytime, anywhere.." can change what YOU said.
| 
