|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 4, 2007 06:04
On July 3, 2007 I filed a lawsuit against Yahoo! and Microsoft, for direct
copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, and vicarious
copyright infringement. A copy of the lawsuit can be found at this link:
http://www.cybersheet.com/complaint-yahoo-070307.pdf
This lawsuit was made necessary, because when I sued Google for doing the
same thing, the Court held that I had not alleged direct infringement of a
registered work. Consequently, that legal issue was not addressed (the
Google case is still under appeal).
|
| |
|
| | 64 Comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 5, 2007 23:47
>I can't say this any more clear, you don't know what the hell you are
>doing.
"Teddybear" has to post his legal advice anonymously lest he run afoul of
any UPL statutues. Oh wait, he's doing that anyway -- and repeateedly. He
has to post anonymously so no one will give a shit enough to discover his
identity and then nail him for UPL.
> You can save the technical arguments for the Special Master who will be
> appointed by the Court, and will almost certainly cut you to ribbons.
By telling me I don't have the right to enforce my copyright?
> IF
> you get that far. I'm betting they dump you at the first MTD with a very
> technical and brilliantly written pleading that will probably be authored
> by
> an intern who knows more about the technical aspects of the internet than
> you ever will.
That the internet gives people the right to violate others' copyright?
> And that's BEFORE Yahoo gets their licks in. I'm betting that the Redmond
> Boys will drop one of their East Coast Heavyweight firms on you. I'm
> breathless to see who it is.
|
| Show full article (4.84Kb) |
|
| | 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 00:04
>> That was the "Google maintains the USENET" ruling. This is about a
>> search engine and a web "cache" that is actually a mirror site. Google
>> had stopped putting my pages in its cache in 2003 in response to a
>> request from me. My position here is that I don't need to warn Yahoo or
>> Microsoft because I have registered copyrights and they aren't entitled
>> to DMCA protection due to their profiting from the infringement. This is
>> a different set of facts.
>
> You mean a different set of delusions.
That my copyright is enforceable is now a delusion, according to some.
> You coded the pages as public, dumbass.
Only the public that visits my site, not mirror sites.
> Microsoft or Yahoo can't be held responsible for you ignorance of how the
> web works.
Nor me for their ignorance of how copyright law works.
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 00:28
\>> On July 3, 2007 I filed a lawsuit against Yahoo! and Microsoft, for
>> direct copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, and
>> vicarious copyright infringement.
>
> Because you have
...registered copyrights that were infringed.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 01:45
>> Incorrect. In the google case, the court said I had not alleged
>> infringement of a registered copyright, which is what created the need
>> for
>> this lawsuit.
>>
>
> Have you since actually REGISTERED your copyright?
The complaint stated when the copyrights were registered.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ZFORCEZFORCE Date: Jul 6, 2007 03:16
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:qsmdnTIKDMP-nBPbnZ2dnUVZ_sKunZ2d@pghconnect.com...>>> Incorrect. In the google case, the court said I had not alleged
>>> infringement of a registered copyright, which is what created the need
>>> for
>>> this lawsuit.
>>>
>>
>> Have you since actually REGISTERED your copyright?
>
> The complaint stated when the copyrights were registered.
>
>
Link?
Proof?
Thought not!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 04:43
>>> Have you since actually REGISTERED your copyright?
>>
>> The complaint stated when the copyrights were registered.
>>
>>
>
> Link?
In the original posting.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The Evil TessmacherThe Evil Tessmacher Date: Jul 6, 2007 04:45
Gordon Roy Parker, creator of \"piffle\"" writes...
>
>>> On July 3, 2007 I filed a lawsuit against Yahoo!
>>> and Microsoft, for direct copyright infringement,
>>> contributory copyright infringement, and vicarious
>>> copyright infringement.
>>
>> Because you have
>
> ...registered copyrights that were infringed.
>
So the fact that you perjured yourself when you made that
claim doesn't bother you in the least?
They're going to tear you to shreds, and you're the only
one that can't see that.
--
~
The Evil Tessmacher
Coming Soon to a Kiosk near you!
|
| |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 05:17
>>>> On July 3, 2007 I filed a lawsuit against Yahoo!
>>>> and Microsoft, for direct copyright infringement,
>>>> contributory copyright infringement, and vicarious
>>>> copyright infringement.
>>>
>>> Because you have
>>
>> ...registered copyrights that were infringed.
>>
>
> So the fact that you perjured yourself
No perjury. The copyrights were registered.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jul 6, 2007 05:22
> The very fact that you posted this to misc.invest.stocks, shows bad faith
> and an intent to cause those companies damage.
Actually it is just a matter of disclosure. Lawsuits don't do much to these
companies' stock prices.
It took the people on the GOOG boards about a year to use GOOG to figure out
I was suing them even while they were touting what useful service they have.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
