"Ray Gordon" - who insists on misrepresenting himself as "creator of the
pivot" - despite the fact that his own words prove otherwise - wrote:

After the ruling, the sign appeared on the courthouse with its legal
advisers, to thank its supporters. It especially thanked the pole to
which it was attached, which it described as "a tower of strength,
keeping me upright when things seemed bleakest".

Media gossip suggests that the sign may use this bout of unexpected
publicity to get its own reality-TV show.

Suggestions of running for political office on a campaign ticket of
"speaking out to the public" were not directly denied.

Or, translated into English:

A certain individual has sent yet another off-topic posting to a.s.f. -
purely to have an excuse to send the sig block in which he misrepresents
himself and others.

erm... no...

what's vaguely "interesting" - and for the wrong reasons, at that too,
Mr Parker - is you do this repeatedly, and think that nobody notices.

PS:
Speaking of ignoring awkward questions, here are some you keep avoiding:

1:
How can you justify styling yourself as "the creator of the pivot" in
your marketing, when even your own words - in the .pdf you link to in
your sig block, no less - prove you to be nothing of the sort ?

2:
Is it true to say that your entire agenda is to simply post the same
claims repeatedly, believing this will undermine your so-called
"competitors" - because you have certain beliefs about how search
engines work, and certain beliefs about how people use the Internet ?

Your entire online behaviour points to that being true.

Would you care to address these questions, Mr Parker ?

Someone once repeatedly said: "silence denotes acceptance".
Come to think of it - that was *you*, wasn't it ?
So, does *your* silence mean that you are admitting your behaviour ?