On Sep 9, 10:24 pm, Vance gmail.com> wrote:
> [standup clown routine, complete with juggling]
how long are you planning on sounding like an incoherent fucking idiot
tryin to performed a failed standup routine before you get to the
point. hold on little girl, here's a cursory clap.. ok you happy now?
>
> There are two things about real men that seem to be true: 1) They
> aren't worried about whether they are real men, nor are they
> particularly worried about someone who has to use 'realmen101.html' as
> a kind of manual for being a man.
oops, stupidfuck, let's help out your OBVIOUS, FAILED LOGIC here; you
dumbfucks are on a forum DEDICATED to teaching men how to be men..
sure you might not say it in so many words, but guys are spouting
things like mystery method, RSD, NLP, etc. these were not things they
gleaned from the womb, you fucking idiot. they LEARNED THEM. guys
TAUGHT them how to act like men, so to speak. this is all one big
"MANUAL" for how to behave/act/function like a "man". so don't kid
yourself, pumpkin. you are engaged in exactly the same endeavor. just
because you're too fucking stupid to codify anything into a
comprehensive format doesn't automatically negate my work.
we speak about the 'PRINCIPLES' of manhood on
manhood101.com ...
unlike you, we don't jack off to pet theories and pet methods .. we
speak about the PRINCIPLES that apply to ALL MEN.
gravity is a LAW. it's a CONSTANT. it is a 'manual' for how objects
relate to one another. anybody with a brain who studies physics would
understand that it's paramount to grasp the concept of gravity. this
understanding doesn't fluctate because the principle itself doesn't
fluctuate. it's a constant principle. that's why we refer to it as the
'LAW' of gravity.
in a similar fashion, we are concerned with the LAWS/PRINCIPLES of
social interaction. and we are specifically addressing MEN. this is
why we are referring to the principles of 'MANHOOD'.. as we already
explain in other articles which i will post, this has nothing to do
with the concept of machismo but has everything to do with how men
PRACTICALLY FUNCTION as men. this is not about preference. this is not
about pet theories. this is about understanding social interaction
PRINCIPLES. if you got off your personal high horse long enough to
understand that, you might actually learn something valuable. you
already know how to behave like a bitch, now try acting like a man.
you might enjoy it.
>They aren't cartoon characters
> acting out like is says on p. 45 of the 'Manual for Being a Real Man'
> like you seem to be;
no stupidfuck. this is you projecting your tiny brained understanding
of manhood onto our work. again, you are referencing the failed notion
of machismo which we already debunk in our articles. but this would
require an education to grasp. do any of you children ever crack open
a book?.. holy fuck. i feel like i'm talking to a bunch of retards..
this isn't that hard to grasp if you just pay attention.
>2) they are generally considered nice guys by
> both women and men and are extremely comfortable with themselves and,
> as a result, comfortable with nearly everyone else.
this is actually untrue. real men are NOT considered 'nice guys' by
today's feminist's standards. that's your wishful thinking. real men
are able to tell women "NO".. which means they are not ALWAYS
considered "nice".. and this is seen in their interactions with men
when they become attracted. i can't tell you how many times i've had a
woman refer to me as an "asshole", "jerk", "mean", etc... not because
i did anything particularly terrible when meeting them. mostly this
stemmed from my unwillingness to give them their way, to meet their
feminist expectations...
i have been called "mean" for refusing to buy women drinks. i have
been called an "asshole" for being honest about my opinion of
something. i have been called a jerk for splitting the dinner bill
with a woman, etc. these are not ethical violations. these are simply
examples of a man not catering to the childish expectations of a
feminist-bred woman. in today's society, we see women exhibiting the
entitlement mentality that poisons social interaction.
and yet, even though they say one thing with their mouth, their
actions betray another attitude entirely-- they are TURNED ON. they
are ATTRACTED.
now let's cover males. people will take advantage of other people if
given the opportunity. as a young guy growing up in the workforce, i
have had a couple supervisors try to make me work extra hours without
pay. i didn't know how to speak up for myself at that point.. but when
i finally did, i was considered "difficult" and "demanding". but they
were trying to take advantage of me. they were trying to make me work
for free.
as a real man, i stood up for myself. i wasn't considered "nice" at
that point. but my supervisors learned to respect me. as a result, i
ended up having a great working relationship with them after the
situation was handled. but initially, i was not considered a "nice"
guy.
so to make the blanket statement that 'real men' are considered as
'nice guys' by both men and women is not accurate at all..
> They don't
> declare themselves 'manly men' because they don't have to
yeah but nobody said anything about declaring themselves 'manly men'
so this point is really irrelevant.
> and women
> respond to that and men respond to it, though for different reasons
> (obviously).
they don't respond to men neglecting to call themselves 'manly men'..
they respond to male authority.. which again, makes this point
completely IRRELEVANT.
> You, on the other hand, have the one characteristic of all false men:
> you have to declare your manhood.
wow, how fucking stupid are you?
so if i declare that i'm a guy, i am not a guy?
and if i declare it's sunday, it's really not sunday?....
and if i declare i'm hungry, i'm not really hungry?...
are you a fucking moron?....
just like a little BITCH, you read things EMOTIONALLY. a real man uses
LOGIC & COMMON SENSE. men read for CONTENT. bitches like you read for
emotional meaning and indignant self-righteousness..
> Little boy and what else can you be
> when you think that schoolyard gender insinuations and insults are
> something important,
little incoherent bitch, what else can you be when you support fucking
morons lobbing insults at me?..and you yourself are guilty of
insulting me instead of showing respect and answering my post in a
respectful way.. who the fuck are you to lecture anyone on manhood
when you're too fucking stupid to gage your own hypocrisy? little
girl, you need help.
> you haven't brought any revelations to enlighten
> anyone on this NG and that includes the most clueless newbies.
haha.. just like a LITTLE BITCH, you try to use the classic "we"
social frame. yeah you speak for EVERYONE on planet earth, i forgot.
how fucking presumptuous of you to speak for everyone else.. you are a
classic little bitch. real men can speak for themselves and are able
to make a point without referring to consensus.. notice, when i
address your points, i don't need to reference the number of friends
on myspace who agree with me or disagree with you.. as a real man, i
appeal to reason and common sense. as a punk ass bitch, you make
emotional appeals and rest your argument on consensus.
pathetic. sad and pathetic.
> Everybody here, newbies included, has pretty much grown up past the
> need for a handbook on manhood
wow, i can see i'm talking to a fucking idiot.
obviously you don't grasp the point above that this IS one gigantic
'manual' on manhood.. just because you haven't labeled it as such,
doesn't remove the fact that it functions that way..
and no, stupidfuck, men haven't grown up, otherwise this group
wouldn't exist in the first place.. i can't believe you're so fucking
stupid you can't even grasp the inconsistencies in your failed attempt
at reasoning.. manhood is not simply about peeing while standing up,
you fucking idiot. it is much more involved and complex.. but you
yourself should know that as MASF is chalk full of 'teachings'
designed to teach men how to act with women.. they are ineffective
however, just as you are ineffective, because you fail the test of
reason.. you fail the test of critical scrutiny.
>and is ready to tackle the existential
> problem of how do I get laid. No ism this, or ism that to blame
> things on.
oh so that's the major problem plaguing men: how to get laid?
see, it's simplistic morons like you that make the rest of mankind
suffer when you presume to take the role of teacher and damage the
other guys who come here looking for advice with your utter
pussification.
1. you're too fucking stupid to even grasp this concept. you need to
work on your education before you try to tackle me, junior.
2. you have poor and inaccurate information.
3. you debate like a little bitch throwing a tantrum, unable to answer
anything with reason & common sense, instead resorting to emotional
appeals and group consensus.
did i miss anything?
> What I find hilarious is that people who function from your space are
> the absolute easiest to eliminate in any kind of seduction scenario.
hahahahahahahah.. i would love to have a good laugh watching you try
to "eliminate" me..
oh no! a little girl is going to try and run the show around here! let
me start shaking, pronto.
lol :)
> Just push their little 'manly man' buttons and watch them act the
> fool.
there's really not many 'buttons' i have to push on you.. let's see..
1. clit? check.
2. purse? check.
3. wishful thinking? check.
you're too fucking dumb to compete with me, junior :)
>It's not necessary, of course, you're not competitive, but it
> can be entertaining for the crowd and always gets the lady.
yeah it's always entertaining to watch a monkey dance... should i play
organ grinder music while you jump around, or do you have enough
practice working your own organ?