How tall is Parker?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.seduction.fast Profile…
 Up
How tall is Parker?         


Author: Nomen Nescio
Date: Nov 26, 2007 06:20

Do you think he is quite short, hence the big, obnoxious attitude?

Short, ugly, middle-aged and as Krus T puts it so eloquently, a "fuckin' macaroon".
70 Comments
Re: How tall is Parker?         


Date: Nov 26, 2007 07:01

>Do you think he is quite short, hence the big, obnoxious attitude?

No, while he isn't the 6'2" guy he posted he was, he's at best 6'..
>Short, ugly, middle-aged and as Krus T puts it so eloquently, a "fuckin' macaroon".

When Fuz n I saw him outside his mommie's apt, he was QUITE bent over, almost
unable to stand up right. He looked quite 'lumpy', but alot of it could be
his lack of being able to stand up right. Fuz was QUITE pissed off at grp-ie,
ready to kick his ass (and believe me, Fuz can) but when he saw grp-ie so
damn lame, he just spat on him. Jon walked up to him, asked him for a lite,
and grp-ie searched for a match..was so out of touch with what he may of had
in his pockets, it took him 5 sec to say: "..no, sorry..". Then Fuz told him
(and Jon has it on video) who he was. The look on Gordon's face could stop a
clock. Jon spat on grp-ie as Parker ran away (not fast, almost in pain).

Parker ran away as fast as go can be. Even the PI filming it was amazed
such a (obv to the naked eye) in pain person could move so fast. The PI
followed grp-ie for about a block, then watched as grp-ie just fell into
doorway. Jon told the guy (he had followed, I was in the Limo) to end it.

All said video is waiting to show a Judge in court if grp-ie sues Fuz 'da Bun.

Now, grp-ie will come back with a "it never happened" post, but *IF* he ever
grew the stones to sue Jon Appleton (Fuz 'da Bun) he will again be branded a liar.
Show full article (3.76Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Cyberstalkes         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Nov 26, 2007 15:48

Notice he can't even say the date and time of this alleged incident (nor
give the name of the alleged PI), which, if he is to be believed, seems to
consist of two people stalking me where I live, while also making
threatening remarks about violence.

You'll see the "real" JJT in all his pathetic glory when he's asked, under
oath, for each specific he refuses to give her. He'll be center stage, the
world will be watching and listeening, and he won't be able to deflect.

--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy

Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000

Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work.

Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Show full article (1.18Kb)
10 Comments
Re: Cyberstalkes         


Author: corky
Date: Nov 26, 2007 15:56

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:2aKdnRe8jO_BxtbanZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
> Notice he can't even say the date and time of this alleged incident (nor
> give the name of the alleged PI), which, if he is to be believed, seems to
> consist of two people stalking me where I live, while also making
> threatening remarks about violence.
>
> You'll see the "real" JJT in all his pathetic glory when he's asked, under
> oath, for each specific he refuses to give her. He'll be center stage,
> the world will be watching and listeening, and he won't be able to
> deflect.

Will you give your own account about how you pissed your pants when someone
spoke to you on the street?
no comments
Re: Cyberstalkes         


Author: fakeobama
Date: Nov 26, 2007 20:57

On Nov 26, 3:48 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Notice he can't even say the date and time of this alleged incident (nor
> give the name of the alleged PI)

I did notice that. I also noticed that you never denied this took
place as described, making those horrible 9/11 posts, making those
"force a little girl" posts, or the fact that a self-described
"seduction guru" such as yourself can't produce any evidence that
you've actually ever gotten laid with your methods or otherwise. You
have, OTOH, produced plenty of evidence that you're a dickhead.

FO
7 Comments
Re: Cyberstalkers         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Nov 26, 2007 23:20

>> Notice he can't even say the date and time of this alleged incident (nor
>> give the name of the alleged PI)
>
> I did notice that. I also noticed that you never denied this took
> place as described,

I guess to the "fake Obama" (key word: FAKE), when I say things like "there
is no video" that doesn't count as a denial.
> making those horrible 9/11 posts,
>making those
> "force a little girl" posts,

Even though a "fake Ray Gordon" was verified as having posted as me for
years, and others have been impersonating me for years, people now treat
those lies as if they were fact. Them doing that changes nothing.

As I said with the alleged video or incident, had it erally occurred, JJT
would have no difficulty given them, but he can't because once he does, he
can't change his story, which would be picked apart, because it's false.
Show full article (3.38Kb)
9 Comments
Re: Cyberstalkers         


Date: Nov 27, 2007 04:04

>> making those horrible 9/11 posts,
>>making those
>> "force a little girl" posts,
>
>Even though a "fake Ray Gordon" was verified as having posted as me for
>years, and others have been impersonating me for years, people now treat
>those lies as if they were fact. Them doing that changes nothing.

Yeah, and all those headers and all the posts you made stating that you
DID say such things mean nothing. Can you prove there were 'fake' grp-ies?

What about all the posts you tried to/had nuked, that I and others still have?

IF they were fakes, how did you have some removed? HMMMM?
>As I said with the alleged video or incident, had it erally occurred, JJT
>would have no difficulty given them, but he can't because once he does, he
>can't change his story, which would be picked apart, because it's false.

And what part of "Jon Appleton owns said tapes" do you not understand?

..and why, since you know where he lives, don't you go sue him?
Show full article (6.80Kb)
no comments
Re: Cyberstalkers? Only in gordy roy parker's legal wet dreams!         


Author: Krus T. Olfard
Date: Nov 27, 2007 07:45

gordy roy parker, creator of legal wet dreams, spewed one night and it
looked like:
> Mystery's "proof" on his VH-1 show was RIGGED with PAID TARGETS.

What, exactly, does the above quote have to do with what you were
replying to, which was:

">or the fact that a self-described
> "seduction guru" such as yourself can't produce any evidence that
> you've actually ever gotten laid with your methods or otherwise."?

Nothing, of course. Just you doing your usual lame attempt at deflection
when you cannot put a positive spin on the real answer. No one was
talking about your obsession with Mystery. He was talking about your
total lack of evidence that your bullshit seduction methods actually work
in the real world for even YOU, much less anyone else.
Show full article (2.74Kb)
no comments
Re: Cyberstalkers         


Author: ZFORCE
Date: Nov 27, 2007 14:25

"John Michaels" sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:knX2j.1170$Vq.110@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Ray, get this little bit of information in your dense head.
>
> Technically if a guy spit on you, it is assault. However, you aren't
> going to find a DA to prosecute those charges anywhere in America.
> Nothing that Fuz admitted will make to court in either a civil or criminal
> action.
>
>
You could try Mike Nifong. Hell prosicute anyone without evidence if the
feminists say so.
no comments
Re: Cyberstalkers         


Author: Alex
Date: Nov 28, 2007 14:26

in article F753j.71616$YL5.49465@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net, John Michaels
at hpnotst@sbcglobal.net wrote on 11/27/07 10:20 PM:
Show full article (0.89Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8