> On Feb 11, 9:34 am, "fakeob...@gmail.com" gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Feb 10, 11:55 am, dman mytrashmail.com> wrote:

>

>>> On Feb 11, 5:04 am, HC aol.com> wrote:

>

>>>> On Feb 10, 3:18 am, dman mytrashmail.com> wrote:

>

>>>>> On Feb 10, 4:37 pm, HC aol.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>> On Feb 9, 9:07 pm, dman mytrashmail.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2:42 pm, HC aol.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 8:03 pm, dman mytrashmail.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>>>> On Feb 10, 1:40 pm, HC aol.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 7:31�pm, dman mytrashmail.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> always fucking them at the bar, at a public toilet,

>

>>>>>>>>>> Public toilet?

>

>>>>>>>>>> LOL! I think I'd rather masturbate.  ;-)

>

>>>>>>>>>> Man, I'm glad I'm married.

>

>>>>>>>>> Don't knock it until you have tried it. For instance one of the places
>>>>>>>>> I had sex last night was in the ladies bathroom at Burger King at
>>>>>>>>> about 2am in the morning.

>

>>>>>>>> I dunno, is it my age showing here with this??

>

>>>>>>> Possibly?

>

>>>>>> I've been thinking about it . . . it's not an age thing.

>

>>>>>> Fucking in a Burger King bathroom is disgusting.

>

>>>>>>> I just don't have this "germy fear".

>

>>>>>> I don't have a "germy fear" either, fucking in a Burger King bathroom
>>>>>> is disgusting.

>

>>>>>>> Sure there are some
>>>>>>> places I wouldn't touch for purposes of fucking, like some low
>>>>>>> maintained toilet in the remote outback.

>

>>>>>> Why not, because *that's* disgusting?

>

>>>>> I'm imaging here a long drop you smell from a 100m away, that even
>>>>> though it is a long drop it has overflowed and the toilet is sitting
>>>>> in a flooded state of mess half a foot deep. Add in swarms of flies
>>>>> etc and you starting to get the picture.

>

>>>>> Yes, *that* would be disgusting.

>

>>>> With respect . . . and I'm not being sarcastic . . . let's get
>>>> something straight please. I'm recognizing the difference between a
>>>> bathroom in the outback and a public bathroom that's relatively
>>>> maintained, and clearly recognized the difference before you presented
>>>> me with that stunning visualization of the conditions of the bathrooms
>>>> in the "outback."

>

>>>> But what you failed to address (you just sort of skipped right over
>>>> that part) was that the public toilet you were in most likely wasn't
>>>> cleaned for HOURS prior to you getting there at 2am. I get it. The
>>>> toilets aren't overflowing, and maybe it doesn't have the faint smell
>>>> of urine in the air, I'll give you that maybe the bathroom *looked*
>>>> clean. It wasn't. Let me ask you this . . . would you take your
>>>> whopper with cheese hold the pickles hold the lettuce special orders
>>>> don't upset us, and set up on the water tank in a stall and enjoy your
>>>> meal there? Would *that* be disgusting to you?

>

>>> I'm guessing you have never had sex in a toilet? Even so I fully
>>> expected you could at least imagine the functional details of how it
>>> would go down, but I'll explain it anyway: basically it is generally
>>> exactly the same as sex anywhere else done while standing up. All the
>>> bathroom stall does is provides us with four walls of privacy. Nothing
>>> disgusting or unusual at all about that, is not like we are doing it
>>> in the toilet bowl itself.

>

>>>> Me thinks you're
>>>> taking "have it your way" to a whole new level that was never intended
>>>> by Burger King Inc.

>

>>> hahaha, I should let them know about a new advertising potential! ;-)

>

>>>>>>> But in general most (but not
>>>>>>> all) bathrooms in the city are good to go.

>

>>>>>> Let's not even get into the lack of respect (*that's* an age thing)
>>>>>> for the other Burger King patrons that maybe need to use the bathroom
>>>>>> and maybe - just maybe - don't want to see you and some skank getting
>>>>>> it on, but to lend you some vital data . . . ok, maybe the public
>>>>>> toilet is clean *after* somebdy cleans it, but you have/had  no idea
>>>>>> what went on in that place between that occurance and when you got
>>>>>> there, In fact, by 2 am I'd say there was a lot of pissing and
>>>>>> shitting and lord knows whatever else going on in that public toilet
>>>>>> since it's last douching.

>

>>>>> I avoid ones that are flooded/blocked/etc or otherwise a genuine mess,
>>>>> but if it is in a good state there is no reason to not go for it.

>

>>>> Look, you're unlikely to get HIV from it, but would you like the long
>>>> list or the short list of the non STD-type diseases you open yourself
>>>> (and your woman) up to by getting down in a public toilet? I'm
>>>> convinced that you think I'm being  a wise ass here with this, and
>>>> that I'm just busting on you. I'm not. It really is disgusting. Now I
>>>> know there are cultural differences between where you are on the other
>>>> side of the world and where I am here in the states. But from what I
>>>> know, and no, I've never had the opportunity to travel to and visit
>>>> your country (would love to actually one day), where you are is
>>>> probably very similar to where I am with regards to Burger King. I'm
>>>> assuming there isn't a bathroom attendant stationed in the public
>>>> toilet handing you towels to wipe the water off your hands after you
>>>> wash them, or with bottle of cologne to dole out, like you find in
>>>> some of the nicer clubs. Fact is, there are gaps in the maintenance,
>>>> and even WHEN maintained (cleaned) whose doing the cleaning? Likley a
>>>> minimum age worker that wants to be ANYWHERE BUT where he/she is at
>>>> the  moment that they get the unenviable task of having to clean the
>>>> bathroom. How good of a job do you think the bathroom cleaner at
>>>> Burger King does? I can tell you right now, that that bathroom is
>>>> NEVER on the same level of cleanliness and hygeine, even immediately
>>>> after it's "cleaned" that say the bathroom in my house is.

>

>>> A surprising thought just struck me, hadn't occurred to me as
>>> possibility but... are you one of those people who would go to BK and
>>> have a meal there but never use their bathroom? Waiting until you have
>>> got back home instead, like that guy in American Pie who wouldn't ever
>>> use the school bathroom.

>

>> I don't like touching the door handles. That's where the previous
>> patron just left microscopic fecal material and parasites therein. You
>> can "warsh" your hands all day after you go, but the second you hit
>> that door knob, you're dirty again.

>

>> If I have to take a piss, I just find a bush or piss next to the car.
>> I'm a guy, for chrissake.

>
> lol, I'll bet you wish they handed out little latex gloves at the door
> for your hands!
>
> To be honest I'm aware of that too, I have a tendancy to sometimes
> nudge toilet doors open with my shoe.

> Or at least not place my hand on
> the same generic spot everybody else puts it to open it (helps that
> I'm a different height to others).
>

>>> And yes, NZ is pretty similar to USA in that respect with BK. I'll bet
>>> BK is almost virtually the same the whole world over.

>

>> Not exactly. In NZ they also have McSheep burgers on the menu.

>
> I think they once advertised a Kiwi Burger, but that might have been
> McD's.
>
>
>

>>>>>>> And also generally the
>>>>>>> girls are all good with it too,

>

>>>>>> Are you drugging these girls? What kind of a skank will get picked up
>>>>>> and let somebody fuck 'em in a Burger King bathroom?

>

>>>>> I don't do drugs, they are a waste of money and illegal.

>

>> Some are worth the money. I'd rather spend 50 bucks on a lil' bag of
>> chronic than waste it on a movie, cold greasy popcorn and watered-down
>> cokes, whic h is how much you'll spend  and what you get going to a
>> bad movie.

>
> Or here is an even better idea: don't waste it on either! I certainly
> do not ever go wasting $50 at the movies.
>
>
>

>>>> OK . . . I was sort of being facetious with that comment, but in a
>>>> sense, ya know, you *are* drugging them, I'm assuming there's alcohol
>>>> involved (legal drug), and no, let me save you the typing, I'm not
>>>> implying that you're forcing them to drink.  I mean how else are ya
>>>> gonna get any woman of any quality at all to get down on her knees in
>>>> the stall of a burger king bathroom, let alone allow herself to be
>>>> propped up on the toilet seat with her panties down around her ankles?

>

>>> She brought alcohol for me, perhaps she was trying to "drug" me? Yeah,
>>> I'm a being a bit facetious with that comment too. But it happens, and
>>> has happened to me.

>

>>>> And furthermore, my wife informs me that ladies room is likely in as
>>>> worse shape as the mens room, as women *usualy* don't sit they squat,
>>>> because they don't want to touch the toilet seat in the public toilet,
>>>> so there's ummmm, let's call it spray, all over the seats (in some
>>>> cases). Just because that spray dried up and ya don't see it, doesn't
>>>> mean the residue isn't still there.

>

>>> Did I say I was sitting on the toilet seat?! Nope, even so...
>>> consider this option: putting the lid down (actually makes it a lot
>>> better for sex, without the dip down of the seat with the hole) and
>>> even leaving my jeans on so I'm not sitting with my bare arse (only
>>> need the fly to be undone).

>

>>>>> As for calling a girl a skank....   hmmm... I suspect we have a bit of
>>>>> disconnect here in the way we each see the world.

>

>>>> No, I disagree. It's not because of the different way we see the
>>>> world, she's not a skank because she fucks a lot. Sorry, but if she's
>>>> fucking in a stall in a Burger King bathroom, she's a skank.

>

>>> Riiiite... that makes me a skank too.

>

>>> And of course she would not be a skank because she has had sex with a
>>> lot of guys, I'm her first.

>

>> Skank = fucking a lot o different guys, not just fucking one a lot.

>

> Thanks for clarifying that. Now I really know she is not a skank, as
> previously she hadn't fucked any guys whatsoever.
>

>>>>>>> hell the thrill of it probably turns
>>>>>>> them more on too.

>

>>>>>> I wouldn't be arguing with you if we were talking about a secluded
>>>>>> spot in the park, or on the beach, or any other similar "public" place
>>>>>> at 2am, but a PUBLIC TOILET is just disgusting. Where is your self
>>>>>> respect . . . fuck that, where is this woman's self respect?

>

>>>>> I don't see what any of this has to do with "self respect".

>

>>>> Well, me personally, I'd be embarrassed as hell to have it be known
>>>> that I PU women and take 'em to the public toilet at Burger King to
>>>> fuck 'em. I have self respect.

>

>>>>> There is
>>>>> nothing inherently wrong in this,

>

>>>> 1) It's against the law (well here anyway, I dunno what the public
>>>> nudity/sex laws are in your country). Do you know who Paul Reubens is?
>>>> (Pee Wee Herman.) He was arrested for masturbating in a sex shop IN A
>>>> PRIVATE BOOTH where lonely men go to jerk off to peep shows. And that
>>>> was in a SEX ESTABLISHMENT, not a RESTAURANT.

>

>>> Ok, now that sounds stupid! But america is full of stupid things like
>>> that happening with their laws.

>

>> Come on now, Oceania is just as "aqdvanced" as the U.S., if not
>> moreso; you've got some fucked-up laws too. How about those new
>> statutes regarding aboriginal reparations and sheep sex-abuse laws?

>
> Absolutely, NZ is getting messed up bad with the laws the Labour
> government has been bringing in. Am looking forward to the day they
> kicked out of power.
>
> Oh, and note that Oceania is not a country. Any stuff to do with
> aborigines is over in Australia, not NZ (we have the Maori. And well
> others before the Maori, but the Maori killed them off when the Maori
> arrived in NZ).
>
> The difference between NZ and USA is that we are tiny, we don't have
> so many people thinking up fucked up ideas to do. So the net quantity
> of stupidity here is much much much lower (however which one has the
> highest per capita ratio would be a matter of debate, both full of it
> thanks to one common factor: humans).
>
>
>

>>> I've never heard of that happening in NZ. Admittedly was silly going
>>> into the women's bathroom, but she dragged me in there. But not
>>> something I'd expect to go to court over, is of trival importance.

>

>>>> 2) It's dirty, not as in sexy dirty, but as in disease dirty.

>

>>>> 3) You're not making a porno movie, you are not in a sex club, hell it
>>>> ain't even a PU joint, it's a RESTAURANT where people eat. And you're
>>>> getting naked or somehwat naked and having sex there, in public.

>

>>> Not in public if nobody can see you or knows about it.

>

>>>> 4) YOU might think that the other patrons don't care (and some might
>>>> not) but I gotta tell ya, if my wife and I were in a Burger King,

>

>> Chicks that like to be treated like "whores" love gettin' bent over in
>> some filthy men's room. It doesn't mean they're whores anymore than a
>> guy whop particpates in a chick's "rape" fantasy is a closet rapist:
>> it's just sexual games. I wouldn't do it in a BK, there might be
>> children using the BR, but I've fucked a chick in a bar restroom a
>> time or two.

>
> There are no children hanging around anywhere in the city (not just
> BK, but anywhere else) at 2am on a sunday morning. It is not a "family
> restaurant".
>

>
>

>>> As I explained before, nobody sees.

>

>>>>> unless you are a Bible fanatic who
>>>>> believes any kind of sex before marriage is wrong. Which I'm sure you
>>>>> are not.

>

>>>> You are correct, I am not. We're not talking religious beliefs here,
>>>> we're talking about a public toilet. And I'm no prude either, I've had
>>>> sex in some pretty strange places, but I would *never* subject
>>>> somebody else without their consent, to have to watch or be a part of
>>>> it in any way, EVEN if I found it a turn on to do so.

>

>>> Nobody was watching or being part of it!!

>

>>>>>>>> I wouldn't even take a leak in a Burger King bathroom. OK, maybe, if I
>>>>>>>> had to, but I would try not to touch anything. In fact I'd flush, if I
>>>>>>>> flushed at all, with the shoe covered foot.

>

>>>>>>>> Actually, dman, now that I think of it, it's because of guys like
>>>>>>>> you! ;-)

>

>>>>>>> I'm a tidy kiwi, I took away my used condoms with me. :)

>

>>>>>> Why don't you send them to the Smithsonian??

>

>>>>> hahhahaha

>

>>>>> ummm...  perhaps I'm a NZer not an American?  Adam Smith doesn't mean
>>>>> anything to NZers. But we have Te Papa instead.

>

>>>> Again, you missed the point, but I'll bear that burden this time, I
>>>> should have been more clear.

>

>>>> WHY THE FUCK DID YOU TAKE THE USED CONDOMS WITH YOU????

>

>>>> Ummm, wouldn't flushing them down the toilet when you were done be a
>>>> better plan? I mean what did you do with them, did you put them in
>>>> your pocket? Did you wrap them in a napkin and give them to your
>>>> "lady" to take home as a souvenir?

>

>> No, he said he's on rocky roads right now. He takes 'em home and
>> rinses 'em out. A great PUA like him woul;d go broke havin' to buy new
>> condoms for every chic k he fucks!

>
> hahaha, no! Actually I got a lot of them for free. Plus I do earn way
> more than enough to buy as many as I'd want.
>

>>> Condoms sometimes block toilets I've heard,

>

>> Those BK toilets are the industrial kind here. Looks like enough water
>> force you could flush a cat down one of 'em.

>

>>  I chucked them in to the

>

>>> first rubbish bin I saw on the way out.

>

>>>>>>>>> Was fucking hot and funny as hell too! ;)

>

>>>>>>>> Oh I'm sure it was funny as hell, lol! Hey, of your four options,
>>>>>>>> here's some free advice:  HER PLACE!

>

>>>>>>> ah yes, I did that too. My view however is why would I want to miss
>>>>>>> out on having sex at all the other places?

>

>>>>>> I don't know, filth? Disease? Disgust?

>

>>>>> Disgust comes from a disconnect between your own reality and what is
>>>>> presented to you, that then creates an automatic internal feeling
>>>>> within you towards it. But this is just an emotion you have created,
>>>>> not an inherent trait.

>

>>>> Yeah, disgust. An emotion. That I myself have created in my mind. You
>>>> are correct. What about disease? You leapt right over that.

>

>>>>>>> Because I don't want to not
>>>>>>> have sex! lol

>

>>>>>> Do you not have any self control? And did it ever occur to you that
>>>>>> the fucking might even be BETTER if you make her wait a little longer?

>

>>>>>>> Plus by doing it in the ladies restroom I get to overhear the inane
>>>>>>> conversations the other girls have with each other while in the
>>>>>>> bathroom. *rolls eyes*

>

>>>>>> OK, fine. I just find that to be highly disrespectful to the "other
>>>>>> girls."

>

>>>>>> Unless you have permission and consent from *all* the other people in
>>>>>> the room, public toliet or public library same thing, maybe you should
>>>>>> keep your clothes on in public, no?

>

>>>>> Hey, I have a better idea. Why don't I go get permission from ALL the
>>>>> people in the entire world before I am "allowed" to have sex?

>

>>>> Why would you want to do that? That's the most ridiculous counter
>>>> argument I have ever read. We are not talking about "having sex." We
>>>> are talking about subjecting other, otherwise normal people to YOU
>>>> having sex in a place where they've come to EAT FOOD.

>

>>>>> I'll
>>>>> make sure I ask nicely in a sugar tone voice, with one knee on the
>>>>> ground, a bowed head, and my cap in hand. ;-)

>

>>>> Sarcasm noted. I reckon that's because you don't have a legitimate
>>>> counter argument to my legitimate argument.

>

>>> Nah, I'm more pointing out the silliness of asking people for
>>> permission for such a thing as simply having sex.

>

>> My fuckin' fingers are tired of typing. At least dman isn't posting
>> trite one-liners while busy in this thread.

>
> yup, I noticed this whole thread is one big conspiracy to keep me busy
> here instead ;-)