It's about time women start taking military service
seriously. "Support roles", my ass.

True, they need to do this when they're younger, like the
Men. But, it's still leaps and bounds over today's Gray and
Farrell style dualistic "equality" (AKA Equivalency) - where
the women get equal say for being affirmed as "strong",
while making cookies, changing diapers and performing broken
down tasks that Men are expected to do as a whole.

Men, today, don't need, or have, to "earn" the right to get
laid in a relationship with such women. What they need is
women who put in EQUAL contributions - not token, or
sentimentalistic contributions.

Then, if such situations as this should ever arise within
Western society, we could feel secure knowing that the one
we're with is going to stick by us, because she's EARNED the
title of "Partner".

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1962704,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1

Old women step forward as 'martyrs'

Turin wrote:

That support role claptrap is going to be going down the tubes pretty
fast with women in uniform abusing their positions as outlets for their
hostilities against male prisoners. I agree that it's good to see
attitude hardening against them. We should protect the kids, but not
women. The Israelis may have tried it with women too soon but there's
still time to give it another go.

Turin wrote:

I'm glad you are posting some of your ideas on this subject. I tend to
agree with you on this issue. However, I want women to have the same
rights FOR the same duties.

Stormy wrote:

Hyerdahl wrote:

Lenin wrote:

You might want to add that they're being allowed and
encouraged to abuse male prisoners as part of a "psyche"
strategy. The same strategy that beat down U.S. Men into
non-persons doing "jobs".

Turin wrote: