Funny how in order to justify his statements and beliefs, he has to
reframe his personal definition of "free" so that NOTHING can be free,
then try to force that personal definition on the rest of us.

For most people, they see a yin/yang between free/paid. Speeding
obviously doesn't see the same dichotomy.

Even his own thinking isn't free by his own definition, because it
requires caloric use of some kind to operate his brain. Whether those
calories come from food, from sweet liquids, or from his own body in
the case of starvation, it still requires some cost, according to
Speeding.

Most people aren't so spiritual in their thinking. If something's free,
that usually means that they don't have to spend any of their money to
obtain it. Whatever minimal necessary work is required to obtain the
free product is not considered a cost.

Would I accept a free car if it was emblazoned with advertising like
NASCAR stock cars are? You bet. Would Speeding? Probably not, because
he would claim that it isn't really free, and would be skeptical of the
real "cost" of the product.