> Exposing The Childish Nature of Feminism
>
> Why refer to a woman as a "bitch"
>
> the term "bitch" is a slang term used on the street or in informal
> settings to indicate a female.. but the term itself, on THIS SITE, is
> being used in a TRAINING CONTEXT because we are a professional bitch
> retraining organization.. why don't we just refer to females as
> "women". why do we use such "insulting" or "degrading" language?
>
> 1. language is NEVER insulting. PEOPLE are insulting. and INTENTIONS
> are insulting. but LANGUAGE itself is NEVER insulting.. meaning is
> determined by agreement and context.. the term "feminism" is a BLATANT
> INSULT to men EVERYWHERE. not because of its literal wording but
> because of the INTENTION behind it, as pointed out in the "Feminism
> and its influence" page. the entire concept of Feminism INSULTS our
> manhood. and yet PUSSIFIED men never think to question it because
> questioning Feminism is demonized and thus forbidden; females are
> ALWAYS viewed as "victims" while men are ALWAYS viewed as "sexual
> predators", "deadbeat dads", "rapists", "misogynists", "dorks",
> "losers", "nerds", "perverts", "controlling", "abusive", "sexist",
> etc..
>
> Feminism teaches females to adopt the victim role at all times and
> neglect any responsibility for their actions. they are taught to blame
> men for their problems. and men are taught that they are ALWAYS the
> problem. this is an INSULT that is never addressed and those who DO
> address it are demonized for DARING to do so.. it would be akin to
> punishing slaves for daring to talk about freedom.. this is why the
> legal system today is skewed in favor of women; it rewards those who
> complain about being offended, thus becoming an enabling agent,
> arresting the development of these women. they are stranded in an
> adolescent stage, taught by the legal system that an entitlement
> attitude will be rewarded while those who EARNED the right to speak
> their mind (aka MEN) will be punished. babies demanding their every
> whim be met are encouraged because anyone daring to object to such
> childish behavior is instantly subjected to litigation. if women are
> considered "victims" and we are taught by Feminist dogma that victims
> can never be wrong, then the system has effectively institutionalized
> the victimhood mentality that seeks to blame EVERYONE ELSE but the so-
> called "victim" --it MUST be MEN who are causing the problem because
> "victims" can NEVER be wrong under such a childish definition.
>
> have you ever heard of a woman acknowledging ANY fault in a
> relationship?.. hardly. it's usually the "asshole" boyfriend or the
> "abusive and controlling" guy who is at fault.. well if that's the
> case, what does it say about the woman who picked such a "loser" in
> the first place? such childish blaming tactics say more about the
> pathetic character of the woman (who is in charge of the picking) than
> the so-called "loser".
>
> hence the glaring INSULT of Feminism becomes the BASIS for our term,
> "bitch," which is designed to draw attention to the ACTUAL PROBLEM
> instead of sweeping it under the rug. "bitch" is a DIAGNOSIS of the
> problem. not a name-calling exercise.. unless you consider calling the
> sky "blue" to be name-calling. "bitch" is an ACCURATE description of a
> female constantly on the hunt for authority over males and constantly
> competing with males for power.
>
> 2. in order to fix a problem, the first step is to RECOGNIZE that
> there IS a problem. this is a major part of the battle against
> Feminism. people just don't realize how problematic it is in nature..
> in order to address that problem in a DIRECT way, Manhood 101 employs
> a DIRECT means of addressing it, by NAMING its RESULT-- the production
> of BITCHES..
>
> 3. women are NOT inherently "bitches." but under the guidance and
> cultural pressures of Feminism, women are taught to BECOME bitches and
> REMAIN bitches..
>
> what is a "bitch?" simply put, a bitch is: A WOMAN TRYING TO ACT LIKE
> AND BECOME A MAN, a woman trying to usurp male authority.
>
> this is very very crucial to understanding the fundamental flaw of
> feminism. women have LOST their femininity under the tyranny of
> Feminism. women today are marked by their COMPETITION with men.. when
> they should actually be distinguished by their COMPLEMENTARY (not
> compliment, COMPLEMENT) nature to men. women are supposed to be the
> missing puzzle pieces that FIT into men BY DESIGN..
>
> and yet today we see women trying to COMPETE with men instead of FIT
> INTO men's lives.. women are trying to usurp MALE AUTHORITY.. women
> are trying to BECOME MEN.. and that's why so many men are PUSSIFIED
> and emasculated and demonized today.. they jump like little bitches
> because pseudo-men (angry combative Feminists) have taken over their
> roles in society.. men are supposed to be leaders.. men are supposed
> to be in charge.. men are smarter than women.. men are more capable
> than women.. men are more competent than women.. men are stronger than
> women.. history and common sense prove this without a doubt. and yet
> it's considered HERESY to declare or even think such a thing.. it's
> "1984" revisited.. the Ministry of Feminism is in charge of demonizing
> the opposition-- men. men are obviously more capable than women. and
> yet what do we see on TV and in the media today? bumbling, oafish,
> incompetent men being outwitted and out-accomplished by women.. this
> is not only against nature, it's against REALITY..
>
> but instead of the media mirroring the reality of gender roles and
> gender limitations, we are force fed the Feminist version of reality.
> we are fed the lie that bitches can do anything without limitation
> while guys must give in to any childish whims and demands a bitch
> makes. we may as well just pretend that dogs can speak and are
> qualified to direct our lives.
>
> ..in everyday life, women are nowhere near as competent as men.. yet
> they are taught to compete with men. and bitches do this to their own
> detriment. this is why the divorce rate has skyrocketed.. this is why
> the term "crazy cat lady" applies so often (women who couldn't keep
> men around were forced to seek affection from animals).. this is why
> women foolishly and insecurely feel compelled to declare they are
> "just as smart as men" ..this is why women can't keep men around..
> this is why the term "dumb bitch" was invented.. and this is why the
> term "bitch" is employed on this site.
>
> the term "Bitch" is used to DIAGNOSE the SYMPTOM. many will of course
> have a kneejerk indignant reaction and assume it is used as a bitter,
> insecure term denoting a "sour grapes" attitude. but those who have
> half a brain will understand the importance of CONTEXTUAL USAGE and
> will understand the sanity behind the method. this BITCH society is
> FILLED, CHOKED and INTOXICATED with BITCH EUPHEMISMS aka "politically
> correct terminology".. this site is here to expose the social disease
> of Feminism. this site is here to cut to the chase and give a healthy
> "Fuck you" to social red tape, the backbone of Feminism.
>
> until bitches learn the dangers of feminism.. until bitches learn to
> acknowledge and take responsibility for bad choices.. until men wake
> up to the pussification of their own manhood, the term "bitch" will
> continue to be used on this site to DIAGNOSE the heart of the problem.
>
> The importance of offending a "bitch"
>
> one of the most important things you can do when first meeting a woman
> is to see how she handles being offended. it's important to discover
> whether she's a Demander or a Qualifier.
>
> a Demander is a stubborn bitch who will demand you follow her
> expectations and be under her authority. it's important to discover
> this sooner rather than later as it will ALWAYS come up eventually.
> and it's equally important to be able to practice Frame Control with
> one of these types of bitches as they are the best teaching aid
> around.
>
> DO NOT RUN FROM BITCHES. CONFRONT THEM. they offer the best learning
> experience around for Frame Control. watch how they flawlessly ignore
> your frame, invalidate it and reassert their frame.. practice this
> with them.
>
> you will never get Diehard Bitches (women damaged by feminism to an
> EXTREME DEGREE-- not the average woman) to accept your frame/
> authority, but they make the perfect sparring partner. never give up
> the opportunity to learn frame control from a pure Demander.
>
> a Qualifier on the other hand is a woman who WILL acknowledge your
> frame although it isn't a given that she'll accept your authority over
> her. a Qualifier may or may not try to control the frame. if she does,
> it won't be on par with the Demander who will be confrontational from
> the start. a Qualifier may battle frames with you for awhile but will
> eventually settle back into her natural submissive role. usually this
> is observable in 3 distinctive and sometimes overlapping stages:
>
> 1. confrontation/ early defiant emotional stage
> 2. victim role/ self-pity, passive aggressive emotional stage
> 3. submissive role/ subdued emotional stage
>
> although a Qualifier will mimic the behavior of a Demander at the
> beginning, the qualifying behavior displayed in the latter 2 stages
> will be the giveaway.
>
> it's important to discern what type of woman you're talking to to see
> if you are wasting your time or not.. or how much effort will be
> required to train the bitch to act like a woman again.
>
> Demanders require a lot of time & effort and don't necessarily pay
> off. it's much easier to work with a Qualifier than a Demander because
> a Qualifier is letting you know that she's willing to acknowledge your
> expectations. this is important in getting a Qualifier to eventually
> acknowledge your authority over her.
>
> What is the "Game"?
>
> if Feminism didn't teach women to react like video games, The Game
> would never exist in the first place. people talk about women being
> forgiving, but it's BECAUSE of the unforgiving nature of Feminism that
> men have developed strategies to cope with Feminist-influenced women
> (aka 'BITCHES') penalizing men for even making the effort to initiate
> social interaction.
>
> how many times has a man gone up to a woman and tried to talk to her
> only to be "shot down" for doing something arbitrarily deemed "wrong"
> or "inappropriate" by her?
>
> the more you approach women, the more you realize there are certain
> unwritten protocols that women expect men to follow; and these vary
> from woman to woman. the more men try to adapt, the more they suffer
> as a result.
>
> eg. either a man is too talkative (translation: nervous, effeminate)
> or not talkative enough (translation: shy, boring.) either a man is
> too cocky (translation: player, uncaring, shallow) or he's too timid
> (translation: nerd, dork) or he's too short (translation: irrelevant,
> unimportant, of low status) or too small (translation: weak.) women
> will fault you for not knowing how to speak. and for speaking too
> smoothly. for not being confident enough. and for being too
> confident-- a "player."
>
> bitches complain about not being able to meet new people and yet
> simultaneously reprimand guys with the typical snub: "i can't go out
> with a stranger i just met!" they are completely oblivious to these
> contradictions because Feminism has arrested their growth into
> adulthood. they remain childish in mentality. and as a result, they
> make childish, unrealistic and irrational demands upon men.
>
> these Bitches have unrealistic expectations because they're RAISED
> with an entitlement mentality under Feminism. they are RAISED to be
> spoiled, to get their way by pouting, whining or simply demanding.
> they LEARN that pussified, emasculated guys will never stand up to
> them. they LEARN that pussified guys will buy them drinks, dinners,
> cars, etc. they LEARN that they can get away with things that men
> can't just by crying in the right direction, or more specifically, on
> the right sucker's shoulder. they LEARN that females are excused from
> responsibility while males are shackled to it. they are RAISED to
> believe they are worth more than men because no pussified man would
> dare say otherwise. this is all due to the influence of Feminism.
>
> so men have developed strategies designed specifically to address the
> arrested development of women infected with Feminism. these females
> behave just like little children. they are subject to whims and
> whining, emotional tantrums and irrational expectations. in short,
> they are used to having their cake and eating it too. and without any
> man ever daring to put them in check, the problem only worsens..
>
> so resourceful men have developed "Game" plans designed to manipulate
> these childish women into meeting their needs. when dealing with
> children, you can't necessarily reason with them. you are FORCED to
> either play childish games to manipulate them into doing what you
> want, or you can learn to validate the behaviors you like and
> invalidate the behaviors you don't like. these "games" are designed
> to:
>
> 1. meet the sexual needs of men.
> 2. retrain women to respond to the expectations and needs of men.
> 3. retrain women to grow up and act like adults who respond according
> to principle rather than temporary emotional or childish impulses.
> 4. level the playing field in all areas (work, relationships, legal
> system, etc.) for all men in general.
> 5. produce relationships based upon a MAN'S TERMS/EXPECTATIONS.
>
> "Game" is fictional. it's the pretexts you create for yourself to get
> in a woman's panties or develop a long term relationship with her. and
> it's the set of social skills you develop over time to keep a woman in
> check, making her meet your expectations.
>
> Having "Game" is really code for having a pair of balls; all REAL men
> should have balls to keep any woman in check, regardless of who the
> woman is.. but since most women aren't in check (due to the shortage
> of real men able to put them in check), the Game has adapted and added
> the socialization elements necessary to deal with unchecked women (aka
> "bitches")..
>
> 1. Game to meet or approach a woman- often relies on a pretext to
> approach a woman.
>
> e.g.
> "do you have the time?"..
> "hey i have read that book you're looking at..."
>
> but thru the use of frame control, having to depend upon a pretext (a
> made up excuse to talk to a woman) is no longer necessary. the excuse/
> pretext for talking to the woman can essentially be circumvented or
> completely ignored.
>
> 2. Game to attract a woman- in most cases, requires pretenses based
> upon the awareness of the social conditioning of women, awareness of
> the pussification of men infected with Feminist attitudes, awareness
> of the principles of attraction, and developing frames of interaction
> which are social pretexts constructed to get women to do what you
> want.. an example of this would be the "frame" that exists today that
> causes most men to pay for a woman's dinner. the fact that women buy
> into stupid social frames like this works to your advantage though.
> you can dynamically create the same type of influential frames that
> will pressure females to perform certain behaviors YOU want; just like
> pussified men feel pressured to pay for drinks/dinners, you can apply
> the same type of pressure to a woman, causing her to want to meet YOUR
> expectations in order to avoid YOUR invalidation.
>
> 3. Game to keep a woman in check-- ie. to follow your expectations in
> a relationship. this part of the game is the essential part of your
> manhood.. the first 2 parts of the Game really shouldn't be necessary,
> but the current pussified condition of most men makes those 2 parts
> necessary; for men to date competently, they need to get back the
> proper social leverage. Also, because of the sheer number of pussified
> men today, the relentlessly passive conditioning they express daily
> creates a "Princess Climate" where women feel ENTITLED to anything and
> everything.. now, not only do real men have to deal with the pussified
> men around them, they also have to battle the bitches created by
> Feminism in front of them. these women have confused their gender
> roles and desperately seek to replace the function of men by usurping
> male authority. this is how women become "bitches" as referred to in
> the article "why refer to a woman as a 'bitch'?" this last part of the
> Game is what most men require; to unlearn their pussified behaviors
> and to learn how to regain their MANHOOD and have their needs and
> expectations met without compromise.
>
> Pickup "steps" vs. pickup PRINCIPLES
>
> many guys make the mistake of relying on methods and "steps" to get
> from point A (meeting a woman) to point B (ending up in a relationship
> with a woman.) they don't understand that life always throws
> curveballs.. methods only work in PARTICULAR situations, but
> PRINCIPLES apply EVERY SINGLE TIME.
>
> examples of pickup steps/methods:
>
> 1. go up to a girl and tell her you don't have much time but you need
> to ask her a female related question.
>
> 2. be indirect about your intentions for the first 15 mins. of a
> social interaction with a woman.
>
> 3. wait 3 days before you call a girl back
>
> 4. when she asks if you want to buy her a drink, tell her you don't
> buy drinks for girls but she can buy you one.
>
> 5. don't approach a chick. sit at the bar and act like you're too cool
> for the room. chicks will eventually approach you.
>
> examples of pickup PRINCIPLES:
>
> 1. the man should be in charge and lead the interaction.
>
> 2. men should demand that their needs and expectations be met.
>
> 3. men should maintain an attitude of self-respect-- you are worth
> just as much as any woman. you do not need to pay for their presence
> (ie. buy drinks, dinners, etc.)
>
> 4. learn to say NO to women. do not SPOIL a woman or she will become a
> SPOILED bitch.
>
> 5. make sure women RECIPROCATE your effort/attention/time/money/etc.
> whatever you invest. make sure you get a RETURN ON INVESTMENT,
> otherwise stop investing IMMEDIATELY.
>
> 6. keep women under your authority.
>
> methods do not apply in every situation and can be changed, ignored,
> or blown altogether.
>
> PRINCIPLES on the other hand should ALWAYS be in play and should
> ALWAYS DICTATE your behavior..
>
> let's say for some stupid, naive reason you decide to buy a woman a
> drink.. fine. you just blew the method, BUT you didn't necessarily
> blow the PRINCIPLE as long as you MAINTAIN your functional value
> (authority) .. you can get by and socially interact with a woman
> successfully even after buying her a drink, and in some cases, it will
> actually work in your favor.. but buying a woman a drink is totally
> unnecessary and would be considered a failed step or failed method to
> those who know better. but it doesn't necessary violate the PRINCIPLES
> of Manhood in that your authority is not being violated.
>
> in PRINCIPLE, you have to realize that she is WORTH just as much as
> you.. so at the very least, you are of equal potential value. you each
> have the innate capacity to fill the needs of the other gender. .. you
> should never think that you can fall below being AT LEAST equal in
> potential value compared to a woman... as you learn here at M101,
> you'll come to realize that value can easily be shifted in social
> interactions. this is where methods come in handy... each method is
> designed to inflate your Perceived VALUE in some way. the PRINCIPLE is
> to be of VALUE to a woman.. the method will determine how fast and how
> successfully you are able to generate Perceived Value.
>
> check out our discussion forum at http:manhood101.com/discuss to view
> further discussion of this article.
>
> xoxo,
>
> NFM
> manhood101.com