Yes you did mention the other way of accessing these discussions - but I thought you were suggesting it not telling me to do ... like the way I can quickly jump between ON, Outlook, Word etc. discussion groups. I also just put my own nickname into the search box ...got, although I totally agree with DaveZ. I wish the discussion could (at least) be restricted to ON 2007. Is that selfish? ...

...> what Kathy says it is far less readable on Google Groups and there are so few results per page. So - I'll stick with what we've got, although I totally agree with DaveZ. I wish the discussion could (at least) be restricted to ON 2007. Is that selfish? Guess so. In the course of all this I discovered you could search on your own nickname which is a bit neat. Even after having ...

...- I'll stick with what we've got, although I totally agree with DaveZ. I wish the discussion could (at least) be restricted to ON 2007. Is that selfish? Guess so. In the course ... if we live without making a difference, it makes no difference that we lived "DaveZ" <DaveZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:89F5AA3B-18F4-42BC-868A-E2AE22151AD5@microsoft.com... Is ...

...me, or someone else, which doesn't involve a lot of corporate BS. The issue is one of libel per quod, so I had coffee this morning with an old friend that is an attorney to discuss filing here in California. What was interesting was the following two questions he asked me after firing up the laptop and about 15 minutes with Google: 1. "Vance, do you realistically think this nut case can...

... posting trends on this newsgroup, perhaps it might help to discuss what types of topics would be more or less on-topic ... in functional programming (e.g., books on category theory): 80 Discussions related to any of the above: 80 - 100 (... involving functional programming languages: 20 Off-topic issues (0 - 19): Discussion focusing on threads in other newsgroups not directly related to ...

....emacs.help/browse_frm/thread/5b81fcfd40d1f4ca/ The thread got into discussion about using Alt+‹key› notation instead of emacs's ... than my monolithic posting style. People more began to discuss the issue in earnest, and i think i did... them... but when you get into some the discussion details, esp when all are more earnest in discussing the subject, i really feel that way. Xah ∑ http://...

It was a good discussion...as it clarify some muddle thoughts and long held mis-conception. .1 Western accusation of Mao ..that he killed millions are NOT fact base. It is a little more than fabricated lies. .2 There is no evidence that all the birds in China was killed in 1958 onwards. There is no scientific proof that killings of birds caused the famine in ...

List Of Military Discussion/Info-Sharing Groups http://members.aol.com/warlibrary/share.htm All Groups are Spam Filtered. Off-topic posts donÂ’t get published. Afghanistan Campaign...90247 1-310-532-0634 Military Webmaster Site Link Request Form: http://www.amervets.com/linkreq.htm Military and Vet Info-Exchange/Discussion Groups http://members.aol.com/amerwar/share.htm

...-41DD-B1AE-6594A7B8681D@microsoft.com> wrote: Also, can you provide me with a link to the "non-public" newsgroups? Thanks again. "sheana" wrote: Why do some MS Discussion groups have "public" in them, and other don't? Thanks in advance. For public Microsoft groups, you can use msnews.microsoft.com. For private Microsoft groups, read: http://www.microsoft.com/...

"sheana" in <news:4A91E852-2E26-41FB-BE6F-1BE7DCFE874F@microsoft.com> wrote: Why do some MS Discussion groups have "public" in them, and other don't? Thanks in advance. That depends to which NNTP host you connect. The microsoft.private.* newsgroups are carried only by Microsoft's private NNTP host to which you need a login (but which is still publicly available). They don't ...