In article
pghconnect.com>,
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
>>Another zinger!
>> Great post.
>
> Dude, you just threatened me anonymously,
So call the cops and tell us the report case number.
> in addition to all the other
> lawbreaking you just endorsed.
Has a judge said it was lawbreaking?
> You're just like a drunk picking a fight with a bouncer who has asked you
> nicely, several times, to reconsider your stupidity.
When have you ever asked someone anything nicely?
> The law is NOT on your side here.
Of course not. Nationwide is on your side. Everyone knows that!
> Just remember, the chess imposter was just as arrogant as you are now, and
> now they whine about those lawsuits their targets had the nerve to file to
> defend their rights.
That was not clear English. Please try again.
> If you're not prepared to sign your name to your posts like that, you're not
> prepared to make them, because your name can and will be subpoenaed, and
> criminal complaints can and will be filed.
So what you're saying is that you can't subpoena anyone because they
posted anonymously. So much for that laser-accurate ASCII analyzation
software that could determine with 100%% accuracy the actual author of
any anonymous Usenet post.
> I keep warning you folks that your stupidity is so predictable and so
> well-prepared-for that you'll either wind up sued into oblivion or in prison
> if you continue, but you don't believe me.
So far, it appears that the only person who has ever actually gone to
jail or prison for actions against you (according to you, that is) is
your mother's boyfriend. And there's no third-party verifiable evidence
of that, either. Your claim is that he is still incarcerated this very
day because of his actions towards you when you were under the age of
18.
> Do this long enough and it will
> become inevitable for you.
It's already inevitable. I don't believe you. I haven't believed you for
ages.
I'm searching for third party verification of records of your mother's
death, since you claim that they are so easy to find. (Folks, watch him
claim that I'm a cyberstalker because I'm fact-checking now.)
> You keep getting it in your head that I was ever like your lies said I was,
Huh? This pseudo-English is sounding more and more like word salad every
day.
> when all I was doing was ensuring you and the other cyberstalkers didn't
> inflict distress on my mother.
Were you required to report to your mother every night exactly what you
did on the internet that day? Or did she lovingly look over your
shoulder and read everything to you because you couldn't quite read it
for yourself? I don't quite get how she was *forced* to read Usenet
posts presumably addressed to you unless you forced her to read them, or
she had to read them to you because you're functionally illiterate or
blind and you couldn't afford speech synthesis software or something
like that.
> That mistaken belief of yours, which you
> refuse to let go of, will prove your undoing.
Awww. Da gwim weaper visited the Pawkehs. Kawma's a bitch, ain't it?
