On Jul 29, 9:18Â am, HC
aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 29, 11:51Â am, Vance
gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Jul 29, 7:29Â am, HC
aol.com> wrote:>
[Snipped]
> If I'm selling somebody a car, and the deal is all but done, and then
> they walk, my thoughts are damn, I had him, didn't close.
>
The assumption here is that he had a buyer. I don't know, but it
seems like more of a tire kicker situation and you can't close a tire
kicker.
>> and that the OP's problem is
>> that he doesn't know how to get her. Â
>
> He's right about that.
>
>> The purpose of a date IS to
>> supply more information, which is implied in his post.
>
> Uhhhh, you're right. Â Parker said new information. I said no
> information. I was wrong. Â Mostly my argument is that he did have a
> shot with her, he got the date. He just didn't close the deal.
>
Like I said in another response, there are dates and then there are
dates. A person has to be at least marginally interested in you as a
potential seducer for a date to mean anything, otherwise it's just
going out and has no meaning for seduction beyond that. For her, it
could have been an opportunity to expand her social network or find
somebody with a shared non sexual interest.
>> Â Could he have
>> done better? Â I have no idea, his responses in this thread are a
>> rarity and there isn't much to go on,
>
> From what I gather from reading here is that what he posted was the
> most basic blather out there.
>
Basic yes. And important, nevertheless. The OP appears to me to be
at a very basic level.
[Snipped]
Vance
