> gooddad staggered up to the microphone and slurred:
>

>> On Jan 5, 7:02 pm, Ian MacLure svpal.org> wrote:

>>> good...@rock.com wrote in news:60d63222-8697-4d9c-a445-
>>> 639a59ca4...@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com:

>

>>>> California should pass a law lowering the age of consent to 14

>
> No, California should pass a law instituting the death penalty for child
> rape. Fucking little kids isn't a human right, it's a crime.
>
>
>

>> I'm not with "NAMBLA" and take offense to your slanderous statement.

>
> Writing that you're a pedophile isn't slander, nor is it libel, pedoboi.

>
> On Jan 10, 1:20 am, Chad Stone 127.0.0.1> wrote:
>

>> Writing that you're a pedophile isn't slander, nor is it libel, pedoboi.

>
> Well now you're a slanderous libeler as well. Of course, in my book
> calling someone a pedophile is no worse then calling someone a
> homosexual, but it's still slanderous libel in this case.
>
> Equating those sexually attracted to children with child murderers and
> rapists is where America first went wrong. Even if we were to agree
> that sex between adults and children should certainly be prohibited,
> maintaining sexual fantasies about children is no different then
> maintaining sexual fantasies about any other sort of thing. For such
> fantasies don't need to be acted upon. People may have all sorts of
> sexual fantasies and do not act upon them. For instance, someone may
> have rape fantasies about adults, and not rape, and there's nothing
> wrong with those fantasies. There's a big difference between fantasy
> and reality. A pedophile does not need to rape and certainly does ...

> good...@rock.com wrote:

> Kinsey indicates that his interviews revealed that many more people
> who report sex with older persons when they were a child were
> pleasurable and not harming to them for the remainder of their life
> so far, than people who reported they were harmed.

>
> On Jan 12, 11:51 am, "R. Steve Walz" armory.com> wrote:

>> good...@rock.com wrote:

> -----------------

>> Kinsey indicates that his interviews revealed that many more people
>> who report sex with older persons when they were a child were
>> pleasurable and not harming to them for the remainder of their life
>> so far, than people who reported they were harmed.

>
> Kinsey was a pervert who used suspect methods in his studies.
>
> Just because one has a PhD doesn't mean that he can't be sicko.

>
> On 13 Jan 2008 21:07:14 GMT, xxxxxxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (XXX) wrote:
>

>>as@if.com wrote:

>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:43:19 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
>>> armory.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>>Anna wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 12, 11:51 am, "R. Steve Walz" armory.com> wrote:

>>>>>> good...@rock.com wrote:

>>>>> -----------------

>>>>>> Kinsey indicates that his interviews revealed that many more people
>>>>>> who report sex with older persons when they were a child were
>>>>>> pleasurable and not harming to them for the remainder of their life
>>>>>> so far, than people who reported they were harmed.

>>>>>
>>>>> Kinsey was a pervert who used suspect methods in his studies.
>>>>> ...

>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:18:07 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
> armory.com> wrote:
>

>>>>>>> Kinsey was a pervert who used suspect methods in his studies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just because one has a PhD doesn't mean that he can't be sicko.

>>>>>>------------------
>>>>>>You're repeating Judith Resisman's lies for which she was thrown out
>>>>>>of the Indiana courts with prejudice, meaning she can never refile
>>>>>>her "case'.

>>>>>
>>>>> Table 34 is a fact that can't be explained away so easily..and
>>>>> contrary to your nonsense, was NOT recollections of pedophiles but
>>>>> sexual assaults organized by Kinsey.

>>-------------------------------------
>>Lies and mischaracterizations. These kinds of Reisman-esque LIES and
>>intentionally distorted misreadings of whole content was reviewed at
>>great length by the Indiana courts (for months), and then Reisman's ...

>
> On Jan 17, 4:40 am, "R. Steve Walz" armory.com> wrote:

>> Law wrote:
>>

>>> I haven't read all of the posts because, quite frankly, I find half of
>>> Brandon's posts quite boring, the other half a bit sick. Just thought
>>> that I'd through in a couple of things though.

>>

>>> There is NO such thing as a consensual child. Children can not give
>>> consent.

>>
>> ------------------------
>> Of course they can. They consent to other things such as riding in
>> cars, playing football and soccer, and skiing and other endeavors
>> where they may be hurt. We supervise these activities and provide
>> safety equipment. We can easily do the very same thing for any sex
>> that they want. As for them being intimidated, that is a crime, and
>> for the possibility that a kid may just FEEL intimidated, shamed or
>> embarrassed, the society has the obligation to dispense with and ...

>

>>It's that guy again... wrote:

>>>

>>>>hat SHOULD be is that a sex criminals, such as yourself ,who allow
>>>>adult pedophiles free access to their eleven year old daughter SHOULD
>>>>be....

>>>
>>> ...shot dead...

>

>>Another little butt-raped victim rubbing his ass publically.
>>Steve

>
> ..seems you have issues there..
>
> ..I guess child molesters have such issues.