"Beautiful Woman Syndrome"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.seduction.fast Profile…
 Up
"Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Date: Oct 5, 2006 12:36

A doctor has put together a page explaining how pathetic most "beautiful"
women are, and how men enable these narcissistic, morally bankrupt
creatures:

http://www.bwsyndrome.com/beautiful_woman_syndrome.php

The Symps of course will side with the hotties in order to get laid (if they
loved "women" rather than "pretty women" for example, they'd care about
things like looks bias in employment, but that might translate into an ugly
secretary so no go).

--
Money is not "game."
Looks are not "game."
Social status or value is not "game."
Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.

A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not
teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to
get women and laughs that "loser AFCs pay my rent."
44 Comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: Bornnatural
Date: Oct 5, 2006 12:51

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:RvudnYz6FPVFw7jYnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
>A doctor has put together a page explaining how pathetic most "beautiful"
>women are, and how men enable these narcissistic, morally bankrupt
>creatures:
>
> http://www.bwsyndrome.com/beautiful_woman_syndrome.php
>
> The Symps of course will side with the hotties in order to get laid (if
> they loved "women" rather than "pretty women" for example, they'd care
> about things like looks bias in employment, but that might translate into
> an ugly secretary so no go).
>

Loving women means all women...the gender in general. You know I never
stated just the pretty ones. If you would not side step statements we might
get a good debate going.

BN
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: catfish
Date: Oct 5, 2006 17:16

Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
> A doctor has put together a page explaining how pathetic most "beautiful"
> women are, and how men enable these narcissistic, morally bankrupt
> creatures:
>
> http://www.bwsyndrome.com/beautiful_woman_syndrome.php
>
> The Symps of course will side with the hotties in order to get laid (if they
> loved "women" rather than "pretty women" for example, they'd care about
> things like looks bias in employment, but that might translate into an ugly
> secretary so no go).
>
>
> --
> Money is not "game."
> Looks are not "game."
> Social status or value is not "game."
> Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.
>
> A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not ...
Show full article (1.08Kb)
1 Comment
Re: loser gordon once again shows his hatred for women         


Author: Fast Franky
Date: Oct 5, 2006 17:48

how pathetic can the loser get?
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly
Date: Oct 5, 2006 17:45

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:RvudnYz6FPVFw7jYnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
>A doctor has put together a page explaining how pathetic most "beautiful"
>women are, and how men enable these narcissistic, morally bankrupt
>creatures:
>
Who the hell are you to talk about others being "narcissistic, morally
bankrupt creatures"? Perhaps you have not looked in the mirror or read any
of your own writings.
Show full article (1.08Kb)
3 Comments
Perceptions, statistics, damn lies, and marriage (not in that order)         


Author: PolishKnight
Date: Oct 6, 2006 09:47

Temily wrote:
> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>
>
> And from this website came this:
>
> "Thus there is a major discrepancy between the recipe for success in
> men and in women. With few exceptions, a man must work hard for years
> to become a success, while a woman can become an overnight success just
> by marrying a rich guy."
>
> However, the truth is..
>
> A man becomes an overnight success (not to mention lives longer as
> well) just by getting married :o)
>
> Temily

I wonder what's in that wedding cake. :-)
Show full article (3.42Kb)
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: William Blake Jr.
Date: Oct 6, 2006 09:54

Temily wrote:
> pandora wrote:
>> I not only accepted one, but married him. So there!
>> All our children are geeks, even our daughter. :-)
>> Geeks Rule!!!!!
>
> I agree, my second husband is definately a geek, just like me, and we
> like it that way!
>
> Our kids probably wouldn't call themselves geeks hehe

I used to be a geek but am not one any longer.
In fact I'm thought of quite highly by a lot of people.
The geek was a temporary phase; the poet is permanent.

http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: William Blake Jr.
Date: Oct 6, 2006 09:57

Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
>> I agree, my second husband is definately a geek, just like me, and we
>> like it that way!
>
> He got the leftovers, and odds are he overpaid.

You gonna tell me that someone who's been with someone else is
'leftovers'?

If anything, such a person would have more experience and more wisdom.

You got the Madonna-Whore complex, gordy boy. Maybe that's why you're
hitting on a teenage gymnast (whom you've of course chosen because of
her looks) while claiming that other beautiful women are narcissists
just like yourself.

I shouldn't have made posts in defense of you. Go see JTash.
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: vulnero
Date: Oct 6, 2006 10:00

William Blake Jr. wrote:
> I used to be a geek but am not one any longer.
> In fact I'm thought of quite highly by a lot of people.
> The geek was a temporary phase; the poet is permanent.
>

I'm still pretty much of a geek, but I am also gradually turning into a
sentimental old fool. Is that an improvement?
no comments
Re: "Beautiful Woman Syndrome"         


Author: William Blake Jr.
Date: Oct 6, 2006 10:11

vulnero wrote:
> William Blake Jr. wrote:
>> I used to be a geek but am not one any longer.
>> In fact I'm thought of quite highly by a lot of people.
>> The geek was a temporary phase; the poet is permanent.
>>
>
> I'm still pretty much of a geek, but I am also gradually turning into a
> sentimental old fool. Is that an improvement?

Absolutely! Having sentiments enriches your world and also gives you
more to offer in a relationship.

Now start writing poetry, and your transformation will be complete.

Cheers,

Ilya Shambat
http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
no comments
1 2 3 4 5