|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: OdiousOdious Date: Jan 10, 2007 08:11
"speeding" biz.org> wrote in message
news:Xns98B44AC32AF5Dspeeding@69.28.186.120...> ====== Alt.Seduction.Fast FAQ And Information 1/2 ======
> Posting-Frequency: weekly
> Last-modified: 12/18/2006
>
>
> One of the first FAQs for ASF, dating back to 1994, can be found at
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.seduction.fast/browse_thread/thread/cb
> 1070b38474952b/1f8ddef64090b6f5?hl=en#1f8ddef64090b6f5
>
>
> This FAQ is currently under ongoing changes.
Why the passive voice, there speeding? The FAQ is undergoing changes?
No, YOU have presumed that you should change the FAQ.
So that should read, "I am changing the FAQ."
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: FormhandleFormhandle Date: Jan 10, 2007 15:42
The most common aspect of a FAQ is "Frequently". How is this a FAQ if
none of the questions you list come up frequently? Some of them have
barely, if ever, come up at all except from you.
Also, by repeating a FAQ instead of a pointer to one, you're just
flooding the group with copies of something that you're going to change
constantly. Some up with something solid or wait until you do before
sharing. I mean, it can't be that hard, it's just a single document.
Another thing is, how many people are contributing to your version of
the FAQ? If it's just you, it's not representative of the group, it's
just your opinions.
You may want to rant about my using FS to share a FAQ but the fact
remains that I and others took the time to ensure it covered many actual
often-asked beginner questions, and answered them thoroughly. Many
contributors are also cited and I don't flood the place with duplicate
copies, I only automate the publishing of a pointer to it so if it
changes nobody will get confused between multiple varying copies on USENet.
You bugged the hell out of all of us with your probes recently, so now I
ask you basically the same thing. What's your point?
|
| Show full article (15.77Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: speedingspeeding Date: Jan 10, 2007 05:17
====== Alt.Seduction.Fast FAQ And Information 1/2 ======
Posting-Frequency: weekly
Last-modified: 12/18/2006
One of the first FAQs for ASF, dating back to 1994, can be found at
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.seduction.fast/browse_thread/thread/cb
1070b38474952b/1f8ddef64090b6f5?hl=en#1f8ddef64090b6f5
This FAQ is currently under ongoing changes. Please post a comment in the
thread for any changes, additions, or corrections you'd like to see. The
actual posting of the FAQ is currently maintained by Speeding, with input
from Now Im Confused and dracozna. All input is welcomed and open for
discussion. This document has been created to answer questions about
seduction related information and discussion. While some products,
services, or individuals might be named in this document, no endorcement
or sponsorship is meant or should be implied. This document contains six
parts formatted in two files.
File 1/2
I : Guidelines For Posting
II : History of ASF
III : Where To Start / What To Expect
|
| Show full article (13.76Kb) |
| 42 Comments |
|
|
Author: speedingspeeding Date: Jan 10, 2007 22:56
Formhandle fastseduction.com> wrote in
news:c7qdnYYRaKuZ5zjYnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@giganews.com:
> The most common aspect of a FAQ is "Frequently". How is this a FAQ if
> none of the questions you list come up frequently? Some of them have
> barely, if ever, come up at all except from you.
The first seven questions are all from the original FAQ. Not quite, but
almost word for word. So yeah, they aren't asked that often any more. But
since they were in the original, I put them in the update of the original.
The last three questions are easily the most commonly asked questions on
ASF. The question about Ray is still an ongoing subject in several threads.
> Also, by repeating a FAQ instead of a pointer to one, you're just
> flooding the group with copies of something that you're going to
> change constantly. Some up with something solid or wait until you do
> before sharing. I mean, it can't be that hard, it's just a single
> document.
|
| Show full article (7.14Kb) |
| 38 Comments |
|
|
Author: Now Im ConfusedNow Im Confused Date: Jan 11, 2007 09:17
speeding biz.org> writes:
> Formhandle fastseduction.com> wrote in
> news:c7qdnYYRaKuZ5zjYnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>> Also, by repeating a FAQ instead of a pointer to one, you're just
>> flooding the group with copies of something that you're going to
>> change constantly. Some up with something solid or wait until you do
>> before sharing. I mean, it can't be that hard, it's just a single
>> document.
>
> How does someone post a pointer to a Usenet post?
news:Xns98B44AC32AF5Dspeeding@69.28.186.120
> You are talking about a pointer to a commerical web portal. IE:
> Spam. It's not possible to "point" to a Usenet post because Usenet
> posts do not HAVE pointers. They have headers. And I've never heard
> of a news reader yet that can pull a header in a manner like a URL
> does for a website.
Gnus
news:Xns98B44AC32AF5Dspeeding@69.28.186.120
|
| Show full article (2.11Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FormhandleFormhandle Date: Jan 11, 2007 10:40
speeding wrote:
> Formhandle fastseduction.com> wrote in
> news:c7qdnYYRaKuZ5zjYnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@giganews.com:
> >> The most common aspect of a FAQ is "Frequently". How is this a FAQ if
>> none of the questions you list come up frequently? Some of them have
>> barely, if ever, come up at all except from you.
>
> The first seven questions are all from the original FAQ.
Which was in sore need of updating. Which is what happened.
There's also no "official" here. With the help of a few others, I put
together a more constructive FAQ. You're just re-posting what became
out-dated and added a couple crap questions.
> Not quite, but
> almost word for word. So yeah, they aren't asked that often any more. But
> since they were in the original, I put them in the update of the original.
> The last three questions are easily the most commonly asked questions on
> ASF. The question about Ray is still an ongoing subject in several threads.
|
| Show full article (10.86Kb) |
| 36 Comments |
|
|
Author: Now Im ConfusedNow Im Confused Date: Jan 11, 2007 12:53
Formhandle fastseduction.com> writes:
> speeding wrote:
>
>> Formhandle fastseduction.com> wrote in
>> news:c7qdnYYRaKuZ5zjYnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@giganews.com:>>> The most common aspect of a FAQ is "Frequently". How is this a...
|
| Show full article (12.50Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: OdiousOdious Date: Jan 12, 2007 03:47
"Formhandle" fastseduction.com> wrote in message
news:ErKdncuIp6o1GTvYnZ2dnUVZ_s2vnZ2d@giganews.com...>
> I'm still wondering about you're rolling out the chiseled wheel. What's
> the point? You really still didn't answer that. At least make it
> constructive and useful. Or are you just doing it for political agenda?
>
Speeding is one of those dork dudes that isn't happy unless he's whining
about something in a very pointless and nit picky way. We all know guys
who, having no social life, become obsessed with the minutia of absolutly
pointless bullshit.
Like trek nerds arguing about which captain is best.
The reason he's having a shit fit over the FAQ... is simply bcause he has
nothing better to do.
|
| |
| 33 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: speedingspeeding Date: Jan 13, 2007 10:17
Now Im Confused wrote in
news:87odp446eb.fsf@localhost.localdomain:
> Now that i have come to agree that the FAQ should go, do you really
> think a personal attack is the best way to get the point across that
> speeding is wasteing his time?
I don't consider it a waste of time. I'm honestly trying to put something
up on ASF that is strictly about making ASF better. Not about pointing ASF
readers offsite. And it really is my point of view that when someone is so
vehemitely against improving ASF and just pushing people offsite.. there's
likely a reason for that motive. Especially if it involves pushing them in
a specific direction.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
