This posting provides you with a percentage of the national average for
certain types of crime. A score of 50 would be 1/2 of the national
average, and a score of 200 would be double the national average.

Total Crime: 329
Personal Crime: 392
Murder: 592
Rape: 190
Robbery: 824
Assault: 258
Property Crime: 198
Burglary: 102
Larceny: 112
Vehicle Theft: 291

Pay close attention to the murder calculation: 592 ... almost 6 times
the national average. Very few places in the United States have higher
murder numbers, according to propertymaps.com

Well, discovery against the anonymous freaks in this group just became a
slam-dunk.

The previous poster made a number of death threats against me a few years
ago, and could actually still be prosecuted for them.

He's a SHILL for a certain guru whose lies about his own life were expossed
here, and could no longer post under his own name.

--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru

Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From

Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf

Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing

On Jul 29, 3:22�pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

What exactly makes you think that the alleged action of ONE ANONYMOUS
FREAK gives you any cause at all against any other UNRELATED ANONYMOUS
FREAK?

Are you about to say they're all related?

Do you have any evidence of this? Not delusional day dreams, but real
evidence or proof?

Didn't think so.

Cite? Riiiiiiight.

What stopped you besides it never happened?

All the backslapping and "unity" suggests the work of a group, not one.

One of the downsides of what people do to me here is that it shows motive in
ANY crime. Conspiracy law also allows for liability against an entire group
for the actions of any one, due to the inherent unfairness of any conflict
that has many against one.

The previous poster has stepped in the legal equivalent of quicksand. This
has been long anticipated and well prepared for, but law enforcement said it
wouldn't do anything until they did certain things.

As I've said before, anytime someone finds themselves acting out in an
actionable way against someone, on the basis of what they read from someone
they never met, over the internet, it's time to call a shrink.

I have more than sufficient grounds to conduct digital disocvery of any of
the "backslappers," and shall.

On Jul 29, 4:21 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of absolutely nothing"
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Assertions are not evidence. You'll need EVIDENCE for that kind of
discovery motion to even be considered.

Conspiracy law also requires evidence of a conspiracy.

There's a very good reason you don't have any.

There's no conspiracy, fr00t l00p.

On Jul 29, 4:21 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Suggests??? That's your STRONG EVIDENCE . . . suggests??

LOL!

I'm not interested inw hat other people may or may not do to you here.

*I* don;t do shit to you here except call you an asshole when you act
like one, which is like almost all the time. So go fuck yourself,
asshole.

And if a CRIME has been committed why haven't you called the police,
moron?

HC preciously made similar threats to me, and has praised others in this
group who have threatened me, inciting them to act out.

Those who say "it's just the internet" see threads like this and are
generally converted rather quickly.

A lawsuit related to this thread is in the works, and the public postings
will more than justify some rather extensive discovery. Everyone who has
threatened me, acted as if hating me publicly is somehow legitimate, or
otherwise broken a law or violated a tort has effectively given themselves
motive which makes them suspect whenever I'm targeted.

In this case, the major media will hve a front-row seat with which to watch
the injustice.

"Federal trials are not conducted in the dark."

--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru

Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From

In article pghconnect.com>
"Ray Gordon,
aka Gordon Parker aka Gordon Roy Parker

Well anything is possible when the newsloon doesn't specify who
he is actually talking about. And that makes his post completely
pointless.

On Jul 29, 5:35 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Not ever. Not once. Post a link. HC has even gone so far as to
placate you to the point of agreeing to "stop" whatever it was that
Ray RAy alleges I'm "doing" simply by being specific in his request.
Ray RAy refuses or is unable to provide such specificty, because it
doesn't exist.

Further, Ray Ray isn;t interested in stopping any behavior, he is only
interested in using the courts and the legal system, as a weapon
against his critics.

Nope. People "act out" against you because you invite it. Literally,
you ask for it. HC doesn't speak for anybody but HC. HC has noteven
come close to crossing any lines. If anybody else has, and maybe they
did, go get 'em Ray Ray.

On Jul 29, 5:35 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""

cybersheet.com> wrote:

Not ever. Not once. Post a link. HC has even gone so far as to
placate you to the point of agreeing to "stop" whatever it was that
Ray RAy alleges I'm "doing" simply by being specific in his request.
Ray RAy refuses or is unable to provide such specificty, because it
doesn't exist.

Further, Ray Ray isn;t interested in stopping any behavior, he is
only
interested in using the courts and the legal system, as a weapon
against his critics.

Nope. People "act out" against you because you invite it. Literally,
you ask for it. HC doesn't speak for anybody but HC. HC has noteven
come close to crossing any lines. If anybody else has, and maybe they
did, go get 'em Ray Ray.