Atheist Chaplain wrote... I'm betting that JB knows exactly what he can and cannot do when it comes to recalcitrant passengers, or even passengers that try and endanger the crew, passengers or aircraft, without having to get approval from a company lawyer Undoubtedly. If the guy can manage to get a jet from one side of the world to another without getting lost and without running...

... would become simple: "We could deliver a short message, a two-word message: 'You're next.'" Faced with the prospect of sharing Saddam's fate, Syrians, Iranians, Sudanese, and other recalcitrant regimes would see submission as the wiser course -- so Perle and others believed. Members of the administration tried to imbue this strategic vision with a softer ideological gloss. "For 60 years...

"Atheist Chaplain" <abused@cia.gov> wrote in message news:ga79bm$o5s$1@aioe.org... I'm betting that JB knows exactly what he can and cannot do when it comes to recalcitrant passengers, or even passengers that try and endanger the crew, passengers or aircraft, without having to get approval from a company lawyer :-) But it WAS a company lawyer who insisted the tool to be ...

...JB? An aviation lawyer perhaps? (I'm not claiming to be one). Sylvia. I'm betting that JB knows exactly what he can and cannot do when it comes to recalcitrant passengers, or even passengers that try and endanger the crew, passengers or aircraft, without having to get approval from a company lawyer :-) Most of the time it's clear cut anyway. The situation...

...JB? An aviation lawyer perhaps? (I'm not claiming to be one). Sylvia. I'm betting that JB knows exactly what he can and cannot do when it comes to recalcitrant passengers, or even passengers that try and endanger the crew, passengers or aircraft, without having to get approval from a company lawyer :-) -- "Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."...

... > No they didnt. They actually admitted that they treated Galileo badly at that time. At the heart of the bad treatment was Galileo's recalcitrance in recanting his support of Copernicus' heliocentric system. Yes, but even those fools had managed to work out that the earth did indeed revolve around the ...

...>> > > No they didnt. They actually admitted that they treated Galileo badly at that time. At the heart of the bad treatment was Galileo's recalcitrance in recanting his support of Copernicus' heliocentric system. Yes, but even those fools had managed to work out that the earth did indeed revolve around the sun LONG ...

... No they didnt. They actually admitted that they treated Galileo badly at that time. At the heart of the bad treatment was Galileo's recalcitrance in recanting his support of Copernicus' heliocentric system. Yes, but even those fools had managed to work out that the earth did indeed revolve around the sun LONG before...

... was wrong. No they didnt. They actually admitted that they treated Galileo badly at that time. At the heart of the bad treatment was Galileo's recalcitrance in recanting his support of Copernicus' heliocentric system. Yes, but even those fools had managed to work out that the earth did indeed revolve around the sun LONG before that...

... was wrong. No they didnt. They actually admitted that they treated Galileo badly at that time. At the heart of the bad treatment was Galileo's recalcitrance in recanting his support of Copernicus' heliocentric system. Yes, but even those fools had managed to work out that the earth did indeed revolve around the sun LONG before that ...