Re: Unlike Phil Scott, I ~~LOVE~~ the CIA and am willing to LICK TRUDY for them if properly asked!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.religion.scientology only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Unlike Phil Scott, I ~~LOVE~~ the CIA and am willing to LICK TRUDY for them if properly asked!         

Group: alt.religion.scientology · Group Profile
Author: smith.jeff28
Date: May 8, 2008 14:20

On May 8, 5:16 pm, Jonathon Barbera ispname.net>
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 13:58:06 -0700 (PDT), haxo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On May 8, 4:43 pm, Jonathon Barbera ispname.net>
>>wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 13:15:06 -0700 (PDT), phil scott
>
>>> philscott.net> wrote:
>>>>On May 8, 12:30 pm, Jonathon Barbera ispname.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> Unlike Phil Scott, I ~~LOVE~~ the CIA and am willing to KILL for them
>>>>> if properly asked!
>
>>>>> I am not a traitor to my country. Phil Scott might end up in
>>>>> Guantanamo with the terrorists if he doesn't learn how to post on an
>>>>> INTERNATIONAL forum.
>
>>>>> Note: I am not a killer. However, if my country needed my assistance
>>>>> to handle a monstrously outspoken dissident, then I would accept a
>>>>> formal request to act. (I will not take the law into my own hands!)
>
>>>>> I'm not suggesting that Phil Scott in particular needs to die, but he
>>>>> certainly does need to learn how to act! (Use some common sense!)
>
>>>>You have not retracted your previous libel....
>
>
>>> You will also note that the FTSOH poster you are insulting in the same
>>> message is actually Sten-Arne Zerpe.
>
>>> I have other examples of you libeling me on this group over the
>>> months, Phil. Do you want all of that used against you as well?
>
>>> (You didn't think before you posted all of those libelous remarks
>>> about me. Libeling me as a "cult op", for example, makes it that much
>>> more difficult for me to move on from the church that I left! You've
>>> libeled me so many times, in fact, that I should be the one calling my
>>> attorney!)
>
>>You seem to forget JB, libelous remarks are only so if they are
>>untrue.
>>All that would need be done is to show your insane ramblings, and the
>>case would be dismissed.
>
> He didn't say that I was insane, however.
>
> He called me a "moron", for one. I took an IQ test when I was in my
> state-sponsored public school that qualified me for the gifted
> program. While this does not make a genius, it does prove that I am
> most certainly not a "moron".
>
> He also called me a "cult op" on more than one occasion. I haven't
> been in the church for 15 years. How can he get away with such lies?
> Why haven't I already sued him for comments he made months ago?

Ok, your insane, and a moron and a cult op.
So what? You can't help it.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!