> On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>>"The pressure on the cans shouldn't affect the reads if you set the
>>sensitivity correctly at the beginning of the session. Unfortunately,
>>you don't know anything about how the meter is standardly used in
>>Scientology."

>

>>Another engineer here. Ok , explain a wheatstone bridge and how the
>>tone arm fits in to it.
>>I hope you go wiki it and come back with a real answer, 'cause maybe
>>then you will stop yammering about things you have no knowledge of.

>
> Why are you so stupid?
>
> If you actually understood how the sensitivity was set at the
> beginning, you'd understand that an accidental change in grip will not
> affect the read...

> Jonathon Barbera wrote:

>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>

>>> "The pressure on the cans shouldn't affect the reads if you set the
>>> sensitivity correctly at the beginning of the session. Unfortunately,
>>> you don't know anything about how the meter is standardly used in
>>> Scientology."

>

>>> Another engineer here. Ok , explain a wheatstone bridge and how the
>>> tone arm fits in to it.
>>> I hope you go wiki it and come back with a real answer, 'cause maybe
>>> then you will stop yammering about things you have no knowledge of.

>

>> Why are you so stupid?

>

>> If you actually understood how the sensitivity was set at the
>> beginning, you'd understand that an accidental change in grip will not
>> affect the read! If you actually tried it, you'd see for yourself.

> ...

> On Tue, 6 May 2008 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:
>

>>"The technology in the Freezone is completely different than
>>Scientology. They do not use L. Ron Hubbard's books and many other
>>changes have been made."

>

>>That is just plain "not true" as in false. The have changed some
>>things, but for the most part they try to stay true to LRH
>>s auditing technique. Right now they are attempting to sort what what
>>DM did to the tech, as it is no longer clear. Not that it really
>>matters, but I give them credit for at least trying.

>
> But you want to destroy the Freezone because you call it Scientology?

> On Tue, 6 May 2008 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:
>

>>Ok, so now you are an engineer too. When you can explain what a
>>Wheatstone bridge

>
> The wheatstone bridge is explained right in the E-meter books! This
> isn't some secret that is kept from Scientologists! See how stupid you
> are?
>
> You want to believe something about Scientology and Scientologists and
> then are dumbfounded when it isn't like that. This is why I keep
> telling you and the other hypocrites to actually study the religion
> which you are attacking!

> Jonathon Barbera wrote:

>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>

>>> Ok, so now you are an engineer too. When you can explain what a
>>> Wheatstone bridge

>

>> The wheatstone bridge is explained right in the E-meter books! This
>> isn't some secret that is kept from Scientologists! See how stupid you
>> are?

>

>> You want to believe something about Scientology and Scientologists and
>> then are dumbfounded when it isn't like that. This is why I keep
>> telling you and the other hypocrites to actually study the religion
>> which you are attacking!

>
> If there was anything of value that the e-meter could read, other than
> the resistance of you skin, don't you think it would be in common use?
>
> It's just an ohm meter dude. It can't measure you soul or your emotions ...

> On Tue, 6 May 2008 06:56:23 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>>On May 6, 9:06 am, haxo...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> "I feel very happy after looking at somethings again. I feel like I
>>> can
>>> make new decisions about my life, more in control, instead of giving a
>>> power greater than myself. I have more confidence that I can be
>>> responsible for myself."

>

>>> And this folks is the big lie.

>

>>> First, you are trained what to say after a session. You read many
>>> wins, so you know just what to say.
>>> This is no evidence of anything, other than the PC was well coached.

>

>>> She may feel that way, but is she? No of course not - she is no
>>> different than the day before. By tomorrow she will feel just like she
>>> did before.

>

>>> No different than a Tide commercial. ...

> On Tue, 6 May 2008 10:59:31 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>>On May 6, 1:24 pm, renedescarte...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>> On May 6, 1:12 pm, Jonathon Barbera ispname.net>
>>> wrote:

>

>>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 06:56:23 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>>>>>On May 6, 9:06 am, haxo...@gmail.com wrote:

>>>>>> "I feel very happy after looking at somethings again. I feel like I
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> make new decisions about my life, more in control, instead of giving a
>>>>>> power greater than myself. I have more confidence that I can be
>>>>>> responsible for myself."

>

>>>>>> And this folks is the big lie.

>

>>>>>> First, you are trained what to say after a session. You read many
>>>>>> wins, so you know just what to say.
>>>>>> This is no evidence of anything, other than the PC was well coached.

> ...

>On May 6, 8:01 pm, justadude gmail.com> wrote:

>> Jonathon Barbera wrote:

>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:

>>

>>>> "The pressure on the cans shouldn't...

>
>"Tom Newton" wrote in message
>news:e097f5xci1.ln2@treeoflife.3v8l2x.net...

>> On 2008-05-07, in <4as1245svmsfvu437oko4rv346480q13fj@4ax.com>
>> Jonathon Barbera

>On May 6, 8:04 pm, Jonathon Barbera ispname.net>
>wrote:

>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT), smith.jef...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>

>>>Ok, so now you are an engineer too. When you...