> This is YOUR warning. Do not slander me again.

> On May 26, 10:27 am, ".." gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> This is YOUR warning. Do not slander me again.

>
> Firstly, it's in writing, it's libel.
>
> Secondly, you are attempting to libel an entire group by claiming they
> harbor pedophiles without there are any. You are making claims of
> "child porn" on pages where it simply doesn't exist. A fully clothed
> 9 year old according to the sign. It's not even borderline
> offensive.
>
> And lastly, you do seem to be overly obsessed with a 9 and 15 year
> old. Given your obsessive nature we have to wonder if your the
> pedophile stalking her. It was an outdoor event, it was a newsworthy
> event. There was no pedophile conspiracy that I can see. A girl with
> a nice sign.... next to a person who got hit with papers from the
> police. Do you feel unusual urges when minors protest? Do you feel ...

> On May 26, 10:27 am, ".." gmail.com> wrote:

>> This is YOUR warning. Do not slander me again.

>
> Firstly, it's in writing, it's libel.
>
> Secondly, you are attempting to libel an entire group by claiming they
> harbor pedophiles without there are any. You are making claims of
> "child porn" on pages where it simply doesn't exist. A fully clothed
> 9 year old according to the sign. It's not even borderline
> offensive.
>
> And lastly, you do seem to be overly obsessed with a 9 and 15 year
> old. Given your obsessive nature we have to wonder if your the
> pedophile stalking her. It was an outdoor event, it was a newsworthy
> event. There was no pedophile conspiracy that I can see. A girl with
> a nice sign.... next to a person who got hit with papers from the
> police. Do you feel unusual urges when minors protest? Do you feel
> threatened by secondary sexual attributes? If so you could be a
> pedophile. This is the sort of thing you need to talk to a ...

> On May 26, 10:27 am, ".." gmail.com> wrote:

>> This is YOUR warning. Do not slander me again.

>
> Firstly, it's in writing, it's libel.
>
> Secondly, you are attempting to libel an entire group by claiming they
> harbor pedophiles without there are any. You are making claims of
> "child porn" on pages where it simply doesn't exist. A fully clothed
> 9 year old according to the sign. It's not even borderline
> offensive.
>
> And lastly, you do seem to be overly obsessed with a 9 and 15 year
> old. Given your obsessive nature we have to wonder if your the
> pedophile stalking her. It was an outdoor event, it was a newsworthy
> event. There was no pedophile conspiracy that I can see. A girl with
> a nice sign.... next to a person who got hit with papers from the
> police. Do you feel unusual urges when minors protest? Do you feel
> threatened by secondary sexual attributes? If so you could be a
> pedophile. This is the sort of thing you need to talk to a ...