|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Patty PieniadzPatty Pieniadz Date: Sep 21, 2008 17:53
Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
Hanson sic
Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
with
him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
other
4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
were to protest gold.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis
|
| |
|
| | 17 Comments |
|
|
Author: feministefeministe Date: Sep 21, 2008 18:14
"Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:6jn90sF43jluU1@mid.individual.net...> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car with
> a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>
> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold. Because
> they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith Hanson sic
> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association" with
> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the other
> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
> were to protest gold.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis
>
That's clearly a complete abuse of process (I dunno oif the expression
exists in California; it should).
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: cultxptcultxpt Date: Sep 21, 2008 18:47
On Sep 21, 8:53 am, "Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> wrote:> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
> with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>
> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
> Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
> Hanson sic
> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
> with
> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
> other
> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
> were to protest gold.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: EldonEldon Date: Sep 21, 2008 19:02
On Sep 21, 6:47 pm, cultxpt gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 21, 8:53 am, "Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
>> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
>> with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>
>> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
>> Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
>> Hanson sic
>> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
>> with
>> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
>> other
>> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
>> were to protest gold.
>
>
> Similar to this injunction in Florida... ...
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: xenubarbxenubarb Date: Sep 21, 2008 19:05
Patty Pieniadz wrote:
> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
> with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>
> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
> Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
> Hanson sic
> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
> with
> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
> other
> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
> were to protest gold.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis
>
>
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: xenubarbxenubarb Date: Sep 21, 2008 19:07
cultxpt wrote:
> On Sep 21, 8:53 am, "Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> wrote:>> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
>> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
>> with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>>
>> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
>> Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
>> Hanson sic
>> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
>> with
>> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
>> other
>> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
>> were to protest gold.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis>
> Similar to this injunction in Florida...
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: R. HillR. Hill Date: Sep 21, 2008 19:19
xenubarb wrote:
> cultxpt wrote:
>> On Sep 21, 8:53 am, "Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> wrote:>>> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto
>>> branch) cops were waiting for us. They stopped us and came to the car
>>> with a thick file (evidently prepared by Scilon staff).
>>>
>>> Here's the reason they gave us to BAN Anons from protesting gold.
>>> Because they had a 10 year old picture of (Happy Smurf next to Keith
>>> Hanson sic
>>> Henson), that means that he was and presumably still "in association"
>>> with
>>> him. In other words guilt by association. Now get this, because the
>>> other
>>> 4 anons were in the car with smurf, they would be ARRESTED if they
>>> were to protest gold.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU4YppPzGis>>
>> Similar to this injunction in Florida... ...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 22, 2008 19:05
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Eldon aol.com> wrote
in msg <5c483fdd-e838-4114-b982-392063603986@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>:
>On Sep 21, 6:47 pm, cultxpt gmail.com> wrote:>> On Sep 21, 8:53 am, "Patty Pieniadz" gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Five anons went to raid Gold yesterday and the Riverside (San Jacinto...
|
| Show full article (1.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mark.tomlesmark.tomles Date: Sep 22, 2008 19:11
I wouldn't say that they have the cops in their pocket, per se, but if
I were a cop (or captain, depending on who handles these things) I
wouldn't want to expose myself to potential lawsuits and "other
action" if I didn't care either way. It's sad, but, as they say, "All
that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: realpchrealpch Date: Sep 22, 2008 13:30
"mark.tomles" wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say that they have the cops in their pocket, per se, but if
> I were a cop (or captain, depending on who handles these things) I
> wouldn't want to expose myself to potential lawsuits and "other
> action" if I didn't care either way. It's sad, but, as they say, "All
> that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
People forget that policemen have an interest in not getting caught up
in what they see as "squabbles". It would be most convenient for the
local police department if people were not picketing at Gold. The Church
of Scientology is a resident, and the picketers would assume the
character of vagrants.
: D
I don't think it's particularly important to picket there, myself. The
only audience will be the police department, and Scientologists at the
base. How much traffic goes by there, anyway?
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
