http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/ Posts for alt.religion.scientology Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:53:13 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/ny_post_katie_holmes_not_selling_tickets_on_broadw_166125984t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/ny_post_katie_holmes_not_selling_tickets_on_broadw_166125984t.html
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07022008/entertainment/theater/you_cruise__you_lose_118139...

==========

YOU CRUISE, YOU LOSE
TOM'S MISSUS KATIE HOLMES A B'WAY MISS

By MICHAEL RIEDEL

Last updated: 6:53 am
July 2, 2008

Posted: 3:54 am
July 2, 2008

When it comes to the Broadway box office, the current Mrs. Tom Cruise
doesn't have a patch on the former Mrs. Tom Cruise.

Katie Holmes, who'll star in the revival of Arthur Miller's "All My
Sons" this fall, may be a nice little actress, but so far she's not
much of a draw, say sources involved in the production who are
beginning to fret that ticket sales aren't as strong as they'd hoped.

"Where are all the Scientologists? Don't they want to see her?" jokes
one person, who requested anonymity for fear that the followers of L.
Ron Hubbard would hunt him down and make him read all 10 volumes of
"Mission Earth."

Ticket brokers and group sales agents, who at one point thought Holmes
would be this season's Julia Roberts - who pretty much sold out "Three
Days of Rain" in One Day of Rain - say interest in the Holmes show is
nil.

"I bought 1,000 tickets to the show," says one broker. "I still have
them."

The advance for "All My Sons," which opens in September, is said to be
less than $1 million.

Contrast that with the $4 million advance Cruise's ex-wife Nicole
Kidman racked up in 1998, when she made her Broadway debut in David
Hare's "The Blue Room."

Kidman was not, it must be remembered, a big star in her own right
back then. But because she was (1) very good in the play and (2) naked
(for about a minute), she set the town on fire. Scalpers were getting
$700 for seats in the balcony - even after critics gave the production
lukewarm reviews.

Kidman ended up on the cover of Newsweek. Her movie career took off
largely as a result of the publicity she received for "The Blue Room."

Insiders say there are several reasons why Holmes is trailing Kidman
at the box office.

"I think if she takes off her clothes, she may catch up," jokes one
wag.

As pretty Ann Deever, who loved a pilot killed in World War II, Holmes
will remain fully attired in a 1940s skirt and sweater throughout the
evening.

It also doesn't help that her husband isn't nearly as popular as he
was in the 1990s, when magazines touted him as the biggest movie star
in the world.

At the time of "The Blue Room," Cruise and Kidman were also about to
open in the steamy Stanley Kubrick movie "Eyes Wide Shut."

Not a great film, to be sure - but one that generated a lot of
attention.

These days, Cruise is still trying to live down his couch dance on
"Oprah."

Holmes, meanwhile, is in the public eye only because she's Mrs. Tom
Cruise.

(By the way, Cruise has been putting out feelers to theater producers
about doing a play at some point. He's in career recovery, which
usually means a visit to Broadway at some point.)

Holmes is also up against a troubled economy, which, several ticket
brokers say, is starting to take its toll on Broadway.

"People aren't shelling out $110 for a play anymore," says a broker.
"It doesn't matter who's in it."

Backstage at "All My Sons," the buzz is that the cast has been forced
to sign confidentiality agreements. The Scientology minders in charge
of Holmes apparently don't want any press they can't control.

Given the lackluster sales for "All My Sons," I would remind them that
beggars can't be choosers.

michael.riedel@nypost.com

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:53:13 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166125472t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166125472t.html brainwashing early", available at:

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/07/03/18513230.php

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:50:23 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/anonymous_are_the_cypherites_from_the_matrix_unive_166153376t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/anonymous_are_the_cypherites_from_the_matrix_unive_166153376t.html "Anonymous" are the Cypherites from the Matrix Universe!

While many of you have seen the first Matrix movie, you may not have
known about advances in that fictional universe since the three movies
were released.

http://thematrixonline.station.sony.com/

Within the Matrix Online, the story has continued and new details have
emerged.

The Cypherites are a "cult" branched off from the Machines. Their
primary purpose is to "protect" unawakened "bluepills" from those who
would Awaken them (to the truth about the nature of the Matrix).

The Cypherites wear masks (bandanas) because they are probably ashamed
of knowing the truth themselves but intentionally keeping the majority
of the people in the dark...

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

3 Comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:30:29 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/christofascist_republinazis_in_texas_166150048t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/christofascist_republinazis_in_texas_166150048t.html
There's some irony in all this inasmuch as it is a predominantly
_Christian_ organization that the Bush terrorist regime is fighting
against. "Pastors for Peace" is delivering a whole lot of books and
other educational materials to a number of public schools and public
libraries in Cuba, and Bush's Republican fascists wants to stop them
from doing so.

Can't have children actually learning anything, no, can we, Republinazis?

At issue are a number of old computers -- 32 of them -- which the
terrorist regime does not want delivered to public schools and libraries
inside of Cuba. That would mean that kids could access the Internet
and read all about what's going on outside in the rest of the world.

God, Christian Republicans are such fucking traitors. They hate everything
that the United States stands for.

---

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:08:56 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/ny_post_katie_holmes_not_selling_tickets_on_broadw_166145952t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/ny_post_katie_holmes_not_selling_tickets_on_broadw_166145952t.html cox.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:4dot64lied467tv8fd9gbok2li71ml6b79@4ax.com...
>
>
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/07022008/entertainment/theater/you_cruise__you_lose_118139...
>

He's concluding well:

"Given the lackluster sales for "All My Sons," I would remind them that
beggars can't be choosers."

poor katie.

r

> ==========
>
> YOU CRUISE, YOU LOSE
> TOM'S MISSUS KATIE HOLMES A B'WAY MISS
>
> By MICHAEL RIEDEL
>
> Last updated: 6:53 am
> July 2, 2008
>
> Posted: 3:54 am
> July 2, 2008
>
> When it comes to the Broadway box office, the current Mrs. Tom Cruise
> doesn't have a patch on the former Mrs. Tom Cruise.
>
> Katie Holmes, who'll star in the revival of Arthur Miller's "All My
> Sons" this fall, may be a nice little actress, but so far she's not
> much of a draw, say sources involved in the production who are
> beginning to fret that ticket sales aren't as strong as they'd hoped.
>
> "Where are all the Scientologists? Don't they want to see her?" jokes
> one person, who requested anonymity for fear that the followers of L.
> Ron Hubbard would hunt him down and make him read all 10 volumes of
> "Mission Earth."
>
> Ticket brokers and group sales agents, who at one point thought Holmes
> would be this season's Julia Roberts - who pretty much sold out "Three
> Days of Rain" in One Day of Rain - say interest in the Holmes show is
> nil.
>
> "I bought 1,000 tickets to the show," says one broker. "I still have
> them."
>
> The advance for "All My Sons," which opens in September, is said to be
> less than $1 million.
>
> Contrast that with the $4 million advance Cruise's ex-wife Nicole
> Kidman racked up in 1998, when she made her Broadway debut in David
> Hare's "The Blue Room."
>
> Kidman was not, it must be remembered, a big star in her own right
> back then. But because she was (1) very good in the play and (2) naked
> (for about a minute), she set the town on fire. Scalpers were getting
> $700 for seats in the balcony - even after critics gave the production
> lukewarm reviews.
>
> Kidman ended up on the cover of Newsweek. Her movie career took off
> largely as a result of the publicity she received for "The Blue Room."
>
> Insiders say there are several reasons why Holmes is trailing Kidman
> at the box office.
>
> "I think if she takes off her clothes, she may catch up," jokes one
> wag.
>
> As pretty Ann Deever, who loved a pilot killed in World War II, Holmes
> will remain fully attired in a 1940s skirt and sweater throughout the
> evening.
>
> It also doesn't help that her husband isn't nearly as popular as he
> was in the 1990s, when magazines touted him as the biggest movie star
> in the world.
>
> At the time of "The Blue Room," Cruise and Kidman were also about to
> open in the steamy Stanley Kubrick movie "Eyes Wide Shut."
>
> Not a great film, to be sure - but one that generated a lot of
> attention.
>
> These days, Cruise is still trying to live down his couch dance on
> "Oprah."
>
> Holmes, meanwhile, is in the public eye only because she's Mrs. Tom
> Cruise.
>
> (By the way, Cruise has been putting out feelers to theater producers
> about doing a play at some point. He's in career recovery, which
> usually means a visit to Broadway at some point.)
>
> Holmes is also up against a troubled economy, which, several ticket
> brokers say, is starting to take its toll on Broadway.
>
> "People aren't shelling out $110 for a play anymore," says a broker.
> "It doesn't matter who's in it."
>
> Backstage at "All My Sons," the buzz is that the cast has been forced
> to sign confidentiality agreements. The Scientology minders in charge
> of Holmes apparently don't want any press they can't control.
>
> Given the lackluster sales for "All My Sons," I would remind them that
> beggars can't be choosers.
>
> michael.riedel@nypost.com
>

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:45:22 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166145440t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166145440t.html cox.net> wrote:

>From the Indy Bay news website, "Scientology 'Study Tech': Start the
>brainwashing early", available at:
>
>http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/07/03/18513230.php
>

The study tech is about using the dictionary to look up words you
don't know. Why are people opposed to the use of a dictionary?

I've been asking people why the study tech is so threatening to
others. I still can't figure it out. Bigots assume that if L. Ron
Hubbard recommends looking up words in a dictionary that all
dictionaries must be bad! It's absurd.

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:40:46 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166137760t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/indy_bay_news_scientology_study_tech_start_the_brainwashing_166137760t.html cox.net> wrote:
>From the Indy Bay news website, "Scientology 'Study Tech': Start the
>brainwashing early", available at:
>http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/07/03/18513230.php

That's a great photograph. Anonymous stopping raw meat from falling
in to the clutches of the crime syndicate, and the clams outside are
worried about how they're going to explain no money to Miscaviage.

---

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:02:55 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/_9443_34999_944_16112_93847_2843_7143_749_44813_166136480t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/_9443_34999_944_16112_93847_2843_7143_749_44813_166136480t.html
http://rahatchange.net/vbb/showthread.php?t=918

حلمك يتحقق... حمل وندوز فيستا عربي اصلي ...الف مبروك

http://www.rahatchange.net/vbb/showthread.php?t=928

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

no comments

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:53:47 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/quite_out_tech_166135968t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/quite_out_tech_166135968t.html sell its "Basics".

Something needs some attention here. Study tech is soon to be buried:
indeed, the ad says that there is now almost no need to use dictionaries
with the Basics, since the lexicons are so great.

The staff who wrote that (perhaps incitated by the dwarf) should be sent to
RPF, together with the dwarf. That's clearly a violation of the most
important rule in study tech.

Besides, I wonder who fabricated all these definitions in those books.

r

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:50:23 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/wikileaks_heads_toward_shitter_too_166135456t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.religion.scientology/wikileaks_heads_toward_shitter_too_166135456t.html
Nobody contributed to the disassembly and investigative efforts of
the censored or otherwise suppressed materials that were uploaded so
Wikileaks is planning on going to a subscription-based, non-Wiki
version of its former self.

It's a shame. Wikipedia failed to live up to expectations and Wikileaks
fell in to the shitter as well.

---

Posted In: alt.religion.scientology

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:48:54 PDT