|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: IntergalacticExpandingPandaIntergalacticExpandingPanda Date: May 11, 2008 04:21
I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
is not defined legally.
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2320532
However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
According to the officer here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Other Officers
seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with
facts, it's protected free speech.
While I am angry, I am empathetic to the officers involved who want to
protect the rights of those involved. They don't want a large
majority to judge the practices of a minority as being strange and
permitting the public to generate social stigma.
But the fact of the matter is... judges have labeled the cult
"schizophrenic and paranoid" and "corrupt, sinister and dangerous."
|
| Show full article (1.55Kb) |
|
| | 17 Comments |
|
|
Author: dirtydirty Date: May 11, 2008 05:08
On May 11, 6:21 am, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
hotmail.com> wrote:> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
> understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
> ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
> is not defined legally.
>
> http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2320532
>
> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
>
> According to the officer herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
> I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
> opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Other Officers
> seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with
> facts, it's protected free speech.
>
> While I am angry, I am empathetic to the officers involved who want to
> protect the rights of those involved. They don't want a large ...
|
| Show full article (1.97Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: IntergalacticExpandingPandaIntergalacticExpandingPanda Date: May 11, 2008 05:19
On May 11, 5:08 am, dirty <3rdco...@ gmail.com> wrote:
> Scientology doesn't like being called a cult, i don't like being
> called a terrorist
BRILLIANT POINT!
While Anonymous isn't a religious group... labeling them as a
terrorist organization 'could be' a form of hate speech. I wonder of
there are any legal remedies to this.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: EldonEldon Date: May 11, 2008 05:20
On May 11, 1:21 pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
hotmail.com> wrote:> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
> understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
> ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
> is not defined legally.
>
> http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2320532
>
> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
>
> According to the officer herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
> I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
> opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Other Officers
> seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with
> facts...
|
| Show full article (1.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RolandRBRolandRB Date: May 11, 2008 06:05
On May 11, 1:21Â pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
hotmail.com> wrote:> I don't understand your laws in this matter. Â In fact, I don't
> understand American laws in this matter. Â I feel no shame pleading
> ignorance. Â Religion at least in the states is something that simply
> is not defined legally.
>
> http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2320532
>
> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
>
> According to the officer herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
> I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
> opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Â Other Officers
> seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with
> facts, it's protected free speech.
>
> While I am angry, I am empathetic to the officers involved who want to
> protect the rights of those involved. Â They don't want a large ...
|
| Show full article (2.94Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: IntergalacticExpandingPandaIntergalacticExpandingPanda Date: May 11, 2008 06:26
On May 11, 6:05 am, RolandRB hotmail.com> wrote:> On May 11, 1:21 pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:>> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
>> understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
>> ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
>> is not defined legally.
>
>
>> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
>> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
>
>> According to the officer herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
>> I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
>> opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Other Officers
>> seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with ...
|
| Show full article (2.68Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RolandRBRolandRB Date: May 11, 2008 06:43
On May 11, 3:26Â pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
hotmail.com> wrote:> On May 11, 6:05 am, RolandRB hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On May 11, 1:21 pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
>
>>> I don't understand your laws in this matter. Â In fact, I don't
>>> understand American laws in this matter. Â I feel no shame pleading
>>> ignorance. Â Religion at least in the states is something that simply
>>> is not defined legally.
>
>
>>> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
>>> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power". ...
|
| Show full article (3.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Android CatAndroid Cat Date: May 11, 2008 08:44
IntergalacticExpandingPanda wrote:
> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
> understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
> ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
> is not defined legally.
>
> http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2320532
>
> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
Scientology fought that all the way to the US Supreme Court, which turned
them down ten years later.
Court rejects blacks' racial-profiling plea October 2, 2001, Gina Holland,
AP, Seattle Post-Intelligencer
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/40997_scotus02.shtml
"Refused to reinstate a Church of Scientology libel case over an
award-winning Time magazine article portraying the religion as a greedy
cult.
|
| Show full article (2.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: smith.jeff28smith.jeff28 Date: May 11, 2008 09:15
On May 11, 9:05 am, RolandRB hotmail.com> wrote:> On May 11, 1:21 pm, IntergalacticExpandingPanda
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:>> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I don't
>> understand American laws in this matter. I feel no shame pleading
>> ignorance. Religion at least in the states is something that simply
>> is not defined legally.
>
>
>> However Time magazine in 1991 (may IIRC) had an issue titled "The
>> Thriving Cult of Greed and Power".
>
>> According to the officer herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LIAQoIJtY
>> I believe he was trying to explain it's ok to disseminate facts, not
>> opinion, It's ok to quote someone, not not your self. Other Officers
>> seemed address this concern as well, as long as you back it up with ...
|
| Show full article (3.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Tom NewtonTom Newton Date: May 11, 2008 09:17
> IntergalacticExpandingPanda
> I don't understand your laws in this matter. In fact, I
> don't understand American laws in this matter. I feel no
> shame pleading ignorance. Religion at least in the states is
> something that simply...
|
| Show full article (2.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
