|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Monica PignottiMonica Pignotti Date: Jun 12, 2008 17:58
This is a continuation, from a discussion from another thread where
"Alert" has just exhibited yet another example of cult-like behavior
in critics:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/browse_frm/thread/08f268...#
Just a few points of clarification before I continue. I am not saying
that all critics behave that way, just some, just so this doesn't get
misconstrued as a generalization. I am not directing this at Anonymous
because this kind of behavior was going on long before Anonymous came
on the scene. Anonymous seems to have triggered this kind of cult-like
behavior in certain critics, but I do not blame Anonymous for that.
|
| Show full article (5.09Kb) |
|
| | 185 Comments |
|
|
Author: kk Date: Jun 12, 2008 18:37
Without citations your opinions are useless. "This is cult behaviour" why?
"because". Little more than a child's argument. Your experience means squat.
While you may call them a group they have no certain religious belief, so
why call them "cult-like"? I think you are just throwing the C word into the
mix to create drama. You cover it up with this "Cult-like" term, you know
what kinds of people like to create drama? Trolls do.
You must know calling them "cult-like" would hurt and offend them, yet thats
the wording you use. What does that say about you? That you enjoy hurting
people? No i don't think so, i just think you are not thinking about the
feelings of the other persons, while you have an agenda to put forth.
"Monica Pignotti" worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:15e92d56-b26b-4f21-98d8-4231d6a6c173@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> This is a continuation, from a discussion from another thread...
|
| Show full article (6.12Kb) |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: henrihenri Date: Jun 12, 2008 18:45
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT), Monica Pignotti
worldnet.att.net> wrote:
|
| Show full article (1.80Kb) |
| 15 Comments |
|
|
Author: Nec_V20Nec_V20 Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:02
On Jun 12, 5:37 pm, "k" ntlworld.com> wrote:> Without citations your opinions are useless. "This is cult behaviour" why?
> "because". Little more than a child's argument. Your experience means squat.
> While you may call them a group they have no certain religious belief, so
> why call them "cult-like"? I think you are just throwing the C word into the
> mix to create drama. You cover it up with this "Cult-like" term, you know
> what kinds of people like to create drama? Trolls do.
>
> You must know calling them "cult-like" would hurt and offend them, yet thats
> the wording you use. What does that say about you? That you enjoy hurting
> people? No i don't think so, i just think you are not thinking about the
> feelings of the other persons, while you have an agenda to put forth.
>
> "Monica Pignotti" worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>
> news:15e92d56-b26b-4f21-98d8-4231d6a6c173@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>> This is a continuation, from a discussion from another thread where
>> "Alert" has just exhibited yet another example of cult-like behavior
>> in critics: ...
|
| Show full article (6.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kk Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:06
> See Monica?
>
> I said to you in the last post of the previous thread that a more
> accurate measure of how cult-like a group has become is by the
> incidence of the use of the word "troll".
>
> It is the net version of the F2F equivalent of "Apostate", "Heretic",
> "Infidel". or the like.
>
> Another way of describing it would be the degree of cognitive lethargy
> and how far the phenomena of incestuous amplification has progressed.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Nec_V20Nec_V20 Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:11
On Jun 12, 6:06 pm, "k" ntlworld.com> wrote:>> See Monica?
>
>> I said to you in the last post of the previous thread that a more
>> accurate measure of how cult-like a group has become is by the
>> incidence of the use of the word "troll".
>
>> It is the net version of the F2F equivalent of "Apostate", "Heretic",
>> "Infidel". or the like.
>> Another way of describing it would be the degree of cognitive lethargy
>> and how far the phenomena of incestuous amplification has progressed.
k,
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kk Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:14
> k,
>
> QUOTE
> Again what belief system are we with on this?
> UNQUOTE
>
> Does it matter?
I am debating the facts, so yes. Why else would i ask?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Nec_V20Nec_V20 Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:31
On Jun 12, 6:14 pm, "k" ntlworld.com> wrote:>> k,
>
>> QUOTE
>> Again what belief system are we with on this?
>> UNQUOTE
>
>> Does it matter?
>
> I am debating the facts, so yes. Why else would i ask?
k,
my answer was also in the post you quoted.
Now what further qualification do you need?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kk Date: Jun 12, 2008 19:44
Sorry, i failed to see the relevance. Please enlighten me. Connect the dots
for me, if you wish for me or others to understand.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Jun 12, 2008 20:15
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
