http://www.telegraph.co.uk/digitallife/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2008/07/04/dlfaceless104...
"'Faceless people' revealed as marketing stunt for new Lotus Eagle"

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/07/a-final-for-the-ages/
"Nadal-Federer possibly is best match ever"

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/06/SPP711KSLR.DTL
"Greatest Match Ever"

Enturbulation.org

Today Tonight Aus to expose Scn child labour locally 7 July
07-04-2008, 05:49 AM #1
Clamosaurus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Church of Scientology Australia (CSA Inc) are headed for a
wretched week, me thinks

Today Tonight once again step up to expose the parts of Scienology
Inc, that the cult try so hard to keep hidden.

YouTube - Scientology child labour in Australia...
(The Youtube Video is a promo for an expose being aired this coming
Monday)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxTOmHuC4Ws

The report includes an interview with David Graham.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/why-i-fled-scientology/2008/04/12/1207856911093...

Coincidentally, C.I on subscription television, is playing Panorama's
John Sweeney/ Scientology and Me on the sunday after the global
pickets at 7.pm(13th)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBid-v4DVIA

Currently, there are numerous complaints being addressed at the
Michigan State attorney General's office so it was no surprise to me
to read this one that was posted several days ago:

Report: #347164
View Similar Reports
Report: Narconon Stone Hawk
Category: Misc. Health Specialists

Narconon Stone Hawk Narconon Stone Hawk's deceitful practices and
unorthodox treaments extremely detrimental to 'students' and their
desperate families. Battle Creek Michigan

Mad in michigan
Southwest Michigan, Michigan

Our story is sadly similar to so many other reports from individuals
who were desperate to help their loved one only to be victimized and
scammed by Narconon Stone Hawk in Michigan.

( Lori, let us know if you got your money. )

RIP OFF REPORT
Report: Narconon
Category: Questionable Activities

Narconon Southern California, Narconon Western U.S., Mike Koburn, June
Rosenberry, Dan Carmichael, Glen Farnsworth, John Duff, Bruce Haddrill
Will not return my $20,000 deposit of 2-7-08 to hold a bed for my son.
My son never entered the Narconon facilities. Newport Beach And Joshua
Hills California

by Lori, Alachua, Florida

June 29, 2008

At the request of Dan Carmichael, intake counselor for Narconon, Inc.,
I sent a $20,000 deposit on 2-7-08 to hold a bed for my son in
Narconon's new Joshua Hills location.

These children are not suffering from a cocaine or Ritalin deficiency.
The practice of drugging children to quiet them while turning them
into drug addicts should be completely illegal. The only real
imbalance Ritalin and cocaine are curing is the imbalance in the bank
accounts of the drug pushers who are turning America's school children
into drug addicts.

This is like checking to see if the child is sober by giving him
alcohol to see if he gets drunk or giving him cocaine to find out if
he was normal. In fact, as alcohol would make the child drunk, giving
a child who has not yet entered puberty cocaine or Ritalin, would put
the child into a stupor. The drug overwhelms the child's central
nervous system and chemically straightjackets the child. Thus, the
child would appear quieter and less active. In fact the child is less
there and the psychiatrist says that he is "attending better." The
only major difference between giving the child cocaine or Ritalin is
that you would have to give the child more cocaine orally than you
would give the child Ritalin orally to get the same result.

The truth is that there is no such test and there is no chemical
imbalance other than the one Ritalin will create. The logic of the
chemical imbalance is reversed to create an illogic but a profitable
illogic for the psychiatric industry.

In real life, it works like this: The parent is told that a chemical
imbalance is suspected. They are then told that the way to find out is
to give the child Ritalin for a few days or weeks and to see if the
child's behavior and attention span improves. When the drug is
ingested, the child slows down and stares straight ahead quietly, thus
giving the impression that he is paying attention. "Success" is thus
dramatic and highly praised by all. With this change, brought on by
the extremely potent drug, the psychiatrist says, "See, I was right.
There was a chemical imbalance."

The truth is that you have a right to know that this is all an
invention. Most of what you will hear is pure unfounded false
"science" and is the product of the ravings of a single group of
psychiatrists in the US who first put it out as "theory" to attract
drug company funding to his university. The theory, thus funded became
the basis for a multi-billion dollar industry world wide which has
attracted psychiatrists, pediatricians, insurance companies, school
officials and teachers, all of whom profit, along with the drug
companies, all at the ultimate expense of the children.

One of the people who wants to drug and subdue the child, perhaps a
psychiatrist, psychologist or school official may tell the parent that
the child has a chemical imbalance in his brain. This is the standard
line usually tried first on the parent. This is very upsetting to hear
from an authority figure. It is a lie and an attempt to overwhelm the
parent. As a parent, you have a right to know which if any chemical is
out of balance and what brain test was used to measure that chemical.
You have a right to know exactly how it would be brought back into
balance if it could be found.

Parents are often told or led to believe that there is a real or
scientific or even medical basis for the "diagnosis." This is an utter
falsehood. There are only two "criteria" for what "attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder" is. The first is listed above in the fourteen
points of which the child needs eight. The second is based on the need
for income on the part of the drug company and the psychiatrists and
other so-called mental health workers.

While some psychologists and psychotherapists claim to have "other
criteria" for "diagnosing" the child, these are based on the fourteen
above and the result as far as the child is concerned is the same. The
only difference is that more money is paid out to different people to
do the mumbo jumbo of labeling the child.