lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as 1st
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.religion.jehovahswitn only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.religion.jehovahswitn Profile…
 Up
lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as 1st         


Author: Elijahovah
Date: Jul 1, 2008 05:44

Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes
who worshipped Zoroaster which is a 5-day difference from Egyptian
for all dates 1513-388 BC. This causes all recorded lunar dates to
appear to Egypt as 9 years later than they were :
Persian Mesor 26 (Zoroastrian Adur 26) = Egyptian Epagum 1
Persian Epagum 1 (Zoroastrian Gatha 1) = Egyptian Toth 1
Persian Toth 1 (Zoroastrian Deh 1) = Egyptian Toth 6
Persian Hatyr 26 (Zoroastrian Aspendadmad 26) = Egyptian Koyak 1
Persian Koyak 1 (Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1) = Egyptian Koyak 6

388 BC onward
(Persian Mesor 26) Zoroastrian Adur 26 = Egyptian Epagum 1
(Persian Toth 1 ) Zoroastrian Deh 1 = Egyptian Toth 1
(Persian Hatyr 26) Zoroastrian Gatha 1 = Egyptian Koyak 1
(Persian Koyak 1) Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1 = Egyptian Koyak 6

http://forum.bib-arch.info/index.php?topic=369.0
14 Comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as         


Author: slothrop
Date: Jul 1, 2008 07:29

On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
> Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes
> who worshipped Zoroaster which is a 5-day difference from Egyptian
> for all dates 1513-388 BC. This causes all recorded lunar dates to
> appear to Egypt as 9 years later than they were :
> Persian Mesor 26 (Zoroastrian Adur 26)  = Egyptian Epagum 1
> Persian Epagum 1 (Zoroastrian Gatha 1)  = Egyptian Toth 1
> Persian Toth  1      (Zoroastrian Deh 1)  = Egyptian Toth 6
> Persian Hatyr 26 (Zoroastrian Aspendadmad 26) = Egyptian Koyak 1
> Persian Koyak 1 (Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1) = Egyptian Koyak 6
>
> 388 BC onward
> (Persian Mesor 26) Zoroastrian Adur 26 = Egyptian Epagum 1
> (Persian Toth   1 )   Zoroastrian Deh 1  = Egyptian Toth 1
> (Persian Hatyr 26)  Zoroastrian Gatha 1 = Egyptian...
Show full article (1.00Kb)
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as         


Author: Inez
Date: Jul 1, 2008 09:22

On Jul 1, 5:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
> Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes
> who worshipped Zoroaster which is a 5-day difference from Egyptian
> for all dates 1513-388 BC. This causes all recorded lunar dates to
> appear to Egypt as 9 years later than they were :
> Persian Mesor 26 (Zoroastrian Adur 26)  = Egyptian Epagum 1
> Persian Epagum 1 (Zoroastrian Gatha 1)  = Egyptian Toth 1
> Persian Toth  1      (Zoroastrian Deh 1)  = Egyptian Toth 6
> Persian Hatyr 26 (Zoroastrian Aspendadmad 26) = Egyptian Koyak 1
> Persian Koyak 1 (Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1) = Egyptian Koyak 6
>
> 388 BC onward
> (Persian Mesor 26) Zoroastrian Adur 26 = Egyptian Epagum 1
> (Persian Toth   1 )   Zoroastrian Deh 1  = Egyptian Toth 1
> (Persian Hatyr 26)  Zoroastrian Gatha 1 = Egyptian...
Show full article (0.96Kb)
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as 1st         


Author: Bob Casanova
Date: Jul 1, 2008 16:37

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 05:44:29 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Elijahovah
wi.rr.com>:
>Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes
>who worshipped Zoroaster which is a 5-day difference from Egyptian
>for all dates 1513-388 BC. This causes all recorded lunar dates to
>appear to Egypt as...
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC         


Author: Tom McDonald
Date: Jul 1, 2008 18:08

Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 05:44:29 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Elijahovah
> wi.rr.com>:
>
>> Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes
>> who worshipped Zoroaster which is a 5-day difference from Egyptian
>> for all dates 1513-388 BC. This causes all recorded lunar dates to
>> appear to Egypt as 9 years later than they were :
>> Persian Mesor 26 (Zoroastrian Adur 26) = Egyptian Epagum 1
>> Persian Epagum 1 (Zoroastrian Gatha 1) = Egyptian Toth 1
>> Persian Toth 1 (Zoroastrian Deh 1) = Egyptian Toth 6
>> Persian Hatyr 26 (Zoroastrian Aspendadmad 26) = Egyptian Koyak 1
>> Persian Koyak 1 (Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1) = Egyptian Koyak 6
>>
>> 388 BC onward
>> (Persian Mesor 26) Zoroastrian Adur 26 = Egyptian Epagum 1
>> (Persian Toth 1 ) Zoroastrian Deh 1 = Egyptian Toth 1
>> (Persian Hatyr 26) Zoroastrian Gatha 1 = Egyptian Koyak 1
>> (Persian Koyak 1) Zoroastrian Furvurdeen 1 = Egyptian Koyak 6 ...
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as         


Author: John Wilkins
Date: Jul 1, 2008 22:53

slothrop hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
...
>
> He looks just like the manager of Flight of the Conchords.

*Such* a good show! Do Americans get it?
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC         


Author: Tom McDonald
Date: Jul 2, 2008 06:04

John Wilkins wrote:
> slothrop hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
> ...
>> He looks just like the manager of Flight of the Conchords.
>
> *Such* a good show! Do Americans get it?

We don't get a lot. I blame Henry Ford.
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as         


Author: slothrop
Date: Jul 2, 2008 06:45

On Jul 2, 12:53 am, j.wilki...@uq.edu.au (John Wilkins) wrote:
> slothrop hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
> ...
>
>> He looks just like the manager of Flight of the Conchords.
>
> *Such* a good show! Do Americans get it?
> --
> John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
> University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
> "He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
> bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."

My friends and I think it's absolutely brilliant...I hope it's coming
back, I'm not sure what kind of audience it got, I have very little
hope for the aesthetic tastes of my fellow countrymen...

slothrop
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC as         


Author: Cubist
Date: Jul 2, 2008 12:15

On Jul 1, 10:53 pm, j.wilki...@uq.edu.au (John Wilkins) wrote:
> slothrop hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Elijahovah wi.rr.com> wrote:
> ...
>
>> He looks just like the manager of Flight of the Conchords.
>
> *Such* a good show! Do Americans get it?
I believe it's on one of the cable channels
-- Showtime or some
such? -- and DVDs are also available here in the States. As to whether
Americans *get the jokes*, that's something else again. There's no
laugh-track; the humor is presented in a very deadpan style; and it's
New Zealander humor, besides. All three factors work against FotC
being grokked by Amurricans, sad to say...
no comments
Re: lunar dates of artaxerxes support both sides 474 BC and 465 BC         


Author: Bob Casanova
Date: Jul 2, 2008 15:42

On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:08:31 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Tom McDonald
charter.net>:
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 05:44:29 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Elijahovah
>> wi.rr.com>:
>>
>>> Calendar in use from 474-424 BC by Artaxerxes...
Show full article (1.49Kb)
no comments
1 2