... it as an egalitarian.     Do you have friends? Do you keep a tally with them. You said "Fairness should be first and foremost." you should measure and tally everything they do for you and everything you do for them.      No tally necessary.  QUALITY trumps quantity.    How do you know you are bing fair to your friends? How...

... are ENTITLED to it.     Do you have friends? Do you keep a tally with them. You said "Fairness should be first and foremost." you should measure and tally everything they do for you and everything you do for them.      No tally necessary.  QUALITY trumps quantity.    How do you know you are bing fair to your friends? How do...

..., according to something I read recently.) Do you have friends? Do you keep a tally with them. You said "Fairness should be first and foremost." you should measure and tally everything they do for you and everything you do for them. No tally necessary. QUALITY trumps quantity. How do you know you are bing fair to your friends? ...

...Not that sadly Mexico and other developing countries are not following it's footsteps. Do you have friends? Do you keep a tally with them. You said "Fairness should be first and foremost." you should measure and tally everything they do for you and everything you do for them. How do you know you are bing fair to your ...

... etc. If, in spite of all that, the Congress could barely manage to retain its 2004 tally, it shows that many things are horribly wrong within the party. But one thing that sticks out is... spite of all that, if the BJP has managed to add more than 30 seats to its 2004 tally, it shows that 21st century Indian elections are not quite the complex and nuanced social, political and ...

..., etc. If, in spite of all that, the Congress could barely manage to retain its 2004 tally, it shows that many things are horribly wrong within the party. But one thing that sticks out is ... spite of all that, if the BJP has managed to add more than 30 seats to its 2004 tally, it shows that 21st century Indian elections are not quite the complex and nuanced social, political and economic ...

... consent of the sacrificed of course) if they do it for religious purposes? Religion should not be a reason to circumvent the law. You can probably strike that point from your tally (unless you think that religious folks can circumvent their law in the name of religion). And your point is what? That the US was founded on values found in the bible, such as the 10 commandments,...

..., so they should be allowed to? Should we allow people to break into houses or sacrifice pets and children (with consent of the sacrificed of course) if they do it for religious purposes? Religion should not be a reason to circumvent the law. You can probably strike that point from your tally (unless you think that religious folks can circumvent their law in the name of religion).