 Up |
  |
Author: Denis LoubetDenis Loubet
Date: Jan 1, 2007 23:03
NOSPAMwriteme.com> wrote in message
news:3Klmh.5616$hr3.2789@newsfe24.lga...
> Prayer is nothing more than a Witch Doctor casting a spell.
That didn't drive me nuts.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: IncitatusIncitatus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 23:00
> Incitatus wrote:
>
>> In article adelphia.com>, "Sugien"
>> adelphia.net> wrote:
>>>>> You will never see the truth because you *REFUSE* to look! One...
|
| Show full article (5.09Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Andrew WAndrew W
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:59
"Eric Brze" no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:o6pjp25bv17urmu2tt81002itkgnrusfuh@4ax.com...> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:16:26 +1100, "Andrew W"
> optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>"Eric Brze" no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4vhip2121g8b2ue84as70ld76s5o49444h@4ax.com...>>> On 31 Dec 2006 20:59:11 -0800, "David" earthlink.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>Back to 6:2-3
>>>>
>>>>What he actually says is that
>>>>1) He is the Lord.
>>>
>>> whose real name is Jehovah.
>>>
>>>>2) He appeared to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
>>>
>>> by the identity of God Almighty. ...
|
| Show full article (2.85Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Martin PhippsMartin Phipps
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:55
I'm not gay but if I were then I would hope people could accept me for
what I was and not see my very existance as an afront to their
religion. :(
Martin
|
| |
|
7 Comments |
|
|
Author: phinnaeusphinnaeus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:41
Jaime G wrote:
> In article 4ax.com>,
> duke cox.net> wrote:
>>> Please provide even one reason to support that God is not real.
>
> Define "god" and let's start from there.
Ok, which one do you want to start with?
- a being which no greater can be thought to exist
- the source of all creation
- an all-loving entity
Do you wish to debate God's qualities?
- omnipotent
- omniscient
- omnipresent
Or God's "non-qualities" (via negativa)?
- eternal
- immutable
- non-material (pure spirit)
|
| Show full article (0.85Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: phinnaeusphinnaeus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:29
Jaime G wrote:
>>
>> As if you could prove any of your assertions, ignorant and second-hand
>> as they are.
>>
>> Get into 2007, discard all that stale 19th century nonsense, and get an
>> education.
>
> OK. I assert that Santa Claus is fake. Now what?
>
Actually, it's pretty much common knowledge that Saint Nicholas was a
real person. The name "Santa Claus" is merely an anglocization of the
Dutch, I believe. You have just asserted a point that is already known
to be wrong. Again.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: phinnaeusphinnaeus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:25
Jaime G wrote:
>> It is curious to be this certain of things for which there is no
>> evidence.
>
> Like Mary's hymen?
You insist that "The" Mary's hymen was broken, but still believe that
"The" Jesus didn't exist? Bizarre.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: phinnaeusphinnaeus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:23
Jaime G wrote:
>> Knowing that you feel that way, I'm sure you'll appreciate looking over
>> just a bit of the evidence that Jesus did, in fact, exist and that he
>> had a most unusual life and death and that there are solid reasons why
>> people believe in those three things you mentionned.
>
> One can argue that somebody by that name existed. In fact, I had a
> bartender named Jesus. You have provided no evidence for miracles.
>
Actually, he did provide text that refered to Jesus' miraculous
activity. His opposition at the time had no explanation for what he
did, so they called it sorcery. By this alone, we see there were many
miraculous events attributed to Jesus by unbiased writers of the time.
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: IncitatusIncitatus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 22:12
In article adelphia.com>, "Sugien"
adelphia.net> wrote:
> I would expound more; like about our studying in each others homes and
> a true study where there is NOT a leader; but rather we pick a subject and
> each researches the next topic before the next meeting. Like I said,it is
> quite difficult for outsiders to even believe it is and has been working for
> some time not to even mention understanding the related principles required
> to be held by all and the faith required to work with each other on this
> intimate level and before you ask NO we do not share our wives, lol
> --
That is fine but you represent yourselves as orthodoxy in Christianity
with THE true understanding of matters of Heaven and Hell - of "Salvation"
- of compliance and non compliance
But you are NONE of these.
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: IncitatusIncitatus
Date: Jan 1, 2007 21:45
In article adelphia.com>, "Sugien"
adelphia.net> wrote:
> Of course you didn't waste time on that crap; because that crap = Christ
> Really Appeared to Paul
> --
Pigs arse
He was a fraud through and through
Maybe even a well intentioned fraud - but a fraud is a fraud is a fraud
You have given me no evidence for Pauls ridiculous assertions and the
Bible itself speaks against his claims
Nuff said
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
