There is a huge oversight by you as well, dear John, and that is that
per the will and testmant of Husayn A'li Nari himself Abbas Effendi
himself is a violator, and hence his appointing an "institution of
guardians" completely bogus and illegal from the get go. Per that
document, after Abbas Effendi, Mirza Muhammad 'Ali is the rightful
second successor and hence centre of the (bogus) covenant of Husayn
'Ali Nari. A simple as that. Per that same document, Abbas Effendi had
no implied or explicit authority to expel any member of his extended
family as violators or otherwise. While the effective leadership of
Mirza Muhammad 'Ali was only to take effect as of the passing of Abbas
Effendi; however the actual centreship of any (bogus) covenant of
Husayn 'Ali Nari rested in both Muhammad 'Ali and Abbas Effendi
simultaneously; with one exercising de jure leadership during his
lifetime, while the other would exercise the same after the first's.
Simple as that. So, given this, the entire (bogus) covenant that stems
from Abbas Effendi and extends back to his father is tout court
disputable, illegal and bogus; and thus from the point of view of the
violation of the Covenant of the Essence of the Letters, His Holiness
the Point, that occured by Husayn 'Ali Nari and his kin vis-a-vis Subh-
i-Azal, the Mirror, raises the very legitimacy of bahaism tout court
going back to Baghdad and Edirne. Your personal salvation in the other
world hinges on your recognition of this very Truth, otherwise ye
shall be tarrying perpetually in the worlds of purgatory (barzakh)
until ye do!

And the Greatest Name is not baha', either. FYI!

W

On Jul 22, 11:31 am, giovanni_c...@hotmail.com wrote: