|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: KoolchickiKoolchicki Date: Dec 5, 2007 19:58
Woof wrote:
> "
> As for science being universal, why do so many different theories abound in
> most categories of science?
Because science is based on knowlege and knowlege evolves over time.
At one time, scientists insisted the world was
> flat. The Big Bang Theory (emphasis on theory) of how the universe came to
> be fails to explain what existed before the Big Bang.
This is a good example of the evolution of scientific thought. We know
the Earth is round now and that the eart revolves around the sun. The
sun is one of billions of suns and our gallaxy is one of billions.
Perhaps that was the
> method God used to create the heavens and Earth?
Perhaps we invent God so that we have some way of explaining what we
are not yet able to understand?
|
| |
|
| | 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: SkipperSkipper Date: Dec 6, 2007 06:44
In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
> Grande Mal wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Woof...
|
| Show full article (1.46Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: On The Highways and Bi-Ways God BuiltOn The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built Date: Dec 6, 2007 08:45
In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M. Hammes
says...>
>Grande Mal wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Woof wrote:
>>>
>>>>"
>>>>As for science being universal, why do so many different theories abound
>>>>in
>>>>most categories of science?
>>>
>>>Because science is based on knowlege and knowlege evolves over time.
>>>
>>>At one time, scientists insisted the world was
>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dennis M. HammesDennis M. Hammes Date: Dec 6, 2007 23:31
Skipper wrote:
> In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
> Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
>
> >>Grande Mal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Koolchicki@smurfsareus.xxx"
|
| Show full article (2.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dennis M. HammesDennis M. Hammes Date: Dec 6, 2007 23:42
On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote:
> In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M. Hammes
> says...
> >>Grande Mal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Koolchicki@smurfsareus.xxx" wrote in message
>>>news...
|
| Show full article (2.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dennis M. HammesDennis M. Hammes Date: Dec 7, 2007 22:57
Skipper wrote:
> In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
> Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
> >
>>Far from "angry," I find it to be one of the more hilarious notions
>>ever to be produced by the grade-school literature, that a Universal,
>>Omnipotent God should need to have his cock sucked by the likes of you.
>
>
> Oh, you wouldn't be a people-hating poltroon, oh no, not you. Cock
> sucked? That's called projection, puppy.
Not if you know the First Rule of cocksucking, which you
self-evidently don't.
(You wouldn't be bragging about it if you did.)
It's not a hard rule to figure out (unless you're a psychopath).
It's why cocksucking has been called "Kissing frogs into Princes"
for over 1500 years.
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dennis M. HammesDennis M. Hammes Date: Dec 7, 2007 23:07
Skipper wrote:
> In article <44ydnS0UtfnUZMXanZ2dnUVZ_rmjnZ2d@ onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
> Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
> >>
>>If God (1) has eyes and (2) is omnipotent, He obviously reads
>>everything poasted to UseNet froups.
>> Our little boifriend is not trying to "convert" us, he's trying to
>>prove to his "God," whom he cannot otherwise find, that he weally
>>weally WUUves Him.
>> Which is stupid and illiterate, since if his God (1) has eyes and
>>(2) is omnipotent, he already /knows/ alla that shit.
>> Our little boifriend would prolly teach his grandmother to suck
>>eggs, too.
>
>
> Why do you care? Nothing else to do? You have to wait before you can
> take another Viagara and look at pitchurs and show 'em who's boss?
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SkipperSkipper Date: Dec 8, 2007 09:59
In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
> Skipper wrote:
>
>> In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
>> Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
>> >
>>
>>>Far from "angry," I find it to be one of the more hilarious...
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SkipperSkipper Date: Dec 8, 2007 10:11
In article onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
> Skipper wrote:
>
>> In article <44ydnS0UtfnUZMXanZ2dnUVZ_rmjnZ2d@ onvoy.com>, Dennis M.
>> Hammes arvig.net> wrote:
>> >
>>>
>>>If God (1) has eyes and (2) is omnipotent, He obviously...
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
