RE: Candy /Bobby Adams
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.prose only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.prose Profile…
 Up
RE: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: sdr
Date: Aug 7, 2006 13:47

> From: "M Schafer" earthlink.net>
> Subject: Candy
> Date: 1999/09/16
> Message-ID: <7rs1r8$np3$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>#1/1
> X-Deja-AN: 526095143
> X-ELN-Insert-Date: Thu Sep 16 17:35:06 1999
> Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc.
> X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Priority: 3
> Reply-To: "M Schafer" earthlink.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
> V5.00.2314.1300
> X-ELN-Date: 17 Sep 1999 00:26:16 GMT
>
> Candy
> by: Bobby Adams
>
> Candy is a sweet, neat treat! ...
Show full article (2.80Kb)
6 Comments
Re: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: donnyblue
Date: Aug 8, 2006 10:49

What an asshole!

sdr wrote:
>> From: "M Schafer" earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Candy
>> Date: 1999/09/16
>> Message-ID: <7rs1r8$np3$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>#1/1
>> X-Deja-AN: 526095143
>> X-ELN-Insert...
Show full article (2.99Kb)
no comments
Re: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: sdr
Date: Aug 8, 2006 22:51

donnyblue wrote:
> What an asshole!

Ah! Someone who disagrees with my assessment
of Bobby Adams' "Candy" (strongly, apparently).

I only wish you would've elaborated at least a little
on your disagreement with me about this particular
work (try to specify what you believe ARE the merits
of the work... if you believe you are able to do so).

Perhaps you will change my opinion of the piece.
Otherwise your inability to provide such positive
arguments will only reinforce the feeling that my
negative comments were justified--as your present
obiter dictum above already has, somewhat... since
what exactly (if anything) you intended with it is a little
bit ambiguous: Who is an asshole? Do you perhaps
suffer from Tourette Syndrome?...
Show full article (3.25Kb)
no comments
RE: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: drg
Date: Aug 9, 2006 19:21

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:47:44 -0700, sdr wrote:

Let me guess -- sdr has never been published, just comments as if he has
been.
>> From: "M Schafer" earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Candy
>> Date: 1999/09/16
>> Message-ID: <7rs1r8$np3$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>#1/1
>> X-Deja-AN: 526095143
>> X-ELN-Insert-Date: Thu Sep...
Show full article (3.06Kb)
no comments
RE: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: drg
Date: Aug 9, 2006 19:23

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:47:44 -0700, sdr wrote:

Hey Bobby, If your aiming for children's market your on the right track.

P.S. Art is Expression.

DRG
>> From: "M Schafer" earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Candy
>> Date: 1999/09/16
>> Message-ID: <7rs1r8$np3$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>#1/1
>> X-Deja-AN: 526095143
>> X-ELN-Insert-Date: Thu Sep...
Show full article (3.08Kb)
no comments
Re: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: sdr
Date: Aug 10, 2006 08:02

drg wrote:
> Let me guess -- sdr has never been published,
> just comments as if he has been.

You will have to explain the difference(s) between
how a published as opposed to an unpublished author
may comment. This should be good. (If he can do it.)

Otherwise you can visit me at http://poems.sdrodrian.com
There more people read my poems in any given month
than might read them in twenty years of book publication.
(Although, true, I forgo the whopping $1,182 I could
earn between advance & a lifetime of royalties.) And, as
I grow older, I find that I happen to be (if it isn't known)
somewhat of a vainglorious & conceited creature... who
more & more (as I have less & less to do) loves to actually
see exactly how many persons are reading my poetry on
a daily basis. Were you one of them?
>>
>> Candy
>> by: Bobby Adams
>>
>> Candy is a sweet, neat treat!
>> Among my favorite things to eat
>> are pixie-stix--so soft so sweet
>> I love to eat my sweet, neat treat.
>>
>> The Japanese love...
Show full article (4.57Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Candy /Bobby Adams         


Author: drg
Date: Aug 10, 2006 21:52

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:02:27 -0700, sdr wrote:
> drg wrote:
>
>> Let me guess -- sdr has never been published,
>> just comments as if he has been.
>
> You will have to explain the difference(s) between
> how a published as opposed to an unpublished...
Show full article (4.88Kb)
no comments