| Re: The Truth About Homomsexuality |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.politics · Group Profile
Author: Meldon FensMeldon Fens Date: Apr 4, 2008 13:35
> "Meldon Fens" meldon.com> wrote in message
> news:G_ydnQ3Lh7rsl2vanZ2dnUVZ_uTinZ2d@uniservecommunications...>>>
>>> "Meldon Fens" meldon.com> wrote in message
>>> news:39idnf6PHPoH4mjanZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@uniservecommunications...
>>> |
>>> | "No One" budweiser.com> wrote in message
>>> |
>>> news:2e8e4a82-5b1c-42e9-affc-61161d879ff6@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>> | > Did you know that most people think homosexuality is wrong? but they
>>> | > are to afraid to say so for fear of being frowned upon by
>>> | > "society".
>>> |
>>> | How's this one. They claim "one is born gay". If that were true, there
>>> would
>>> | be a genetic component which also implies it can be transferred
>>> genetically.
>>> | Total hog-wash.
>>> |
>>> | I recall early in the presidential race, a panel including Melissa
>>> Ethridge
>>> | asking one of the candidates a loaded question , with a premise of
>>> "born
>>> | gay". The candidate answered "incorrectly" and it swept through the
>>> press
>>> | like wild-fire. Stupid bastard couldn't even stand up to a false
>>> premise.
>>> | They can't even answer what they feel for fear of ridicule. Sad
>>> really. We
>>> | all suffer because people feel the need to "win" rather than seek
>>> clarity.
>>>
>>> "Animals that live a completely homosexual life can also be found. This
>>> occurs especially among birds that will pair with one partner for life,
>>> which is the case with geese and ducks. Four to five percent "
>>> http://www.leaderu.com/marco/special/spc11b.html
>>>
>>> 13.95%% of males and 4.25%% of females having had either "extensive" or
>>> "more
>>> than incidental" homosexual experience. [12]
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation
>>>
>>>
>>> 5%% in the animal kingdom, 13.95%% in America.
>>>
>>> That means 8.95%% make the choice to be homosexual.
>>>
>>> nuff said.
>>>
>>>>>
>> Indeed. Choice. Further, I contend seeking a genetic or developmental
>> cause for the choice is flawed. Because animals allegedly choose still
>> doesn't imply a genetic or developmental cause for the choice.
>
> Your laughable attempt at logic notwithstanding, so what if homosexuality
> _is_ chosen?
Proponents of homosexuality might be better served to make an honest basis
for their position just as an opponent of homosexuality would be. Both have
inherently flawed basis for their positions and as a result we as a society
get nowhere while lawyers, advocates and politicians sip Champaign by the
swimming pool laughing at the clods hurling mud at each other.
Its all a waste of time except for those who benefit financially from the
conflict.
| 
