| Re: The Truth About Homomsexuality |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.politics · Group Profile
Author: Meldon FensMeldon Fens Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:10
"JohnN" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:91effea6-87d4-4708-9d98-df64b71d9da4@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 3, 9:14 pm, "Meldon Fens" meldon.com> wrote:>> Did you know that most people think homosexuality is wrong? but they
>> are to afraid to say so for fear of being frowned upon by
>> "society".
>
> How's this one. They claim "one is born gay". If that were true, there
> would
> be a genetic component which also implies it can be transferred
> genetically.
> Total hog-wash.
How do you know it is not genetic? Please post your peer reviewed
research.
(M):
Name the gene that causes sexual preference.
>
> I recall early in the presidential race, a panel including Melissa
> Ethridge
> asking one of the candidates a loaded question , with a premise of "born
> gay". The candidate answered "incorrectly" and it swept through the press
> like wild-fire. Stupid bastard couldn't even stand up to a false premise.
> They can't even answer what they feel for fear of ridicule. Sad really. We
> all suffer because people feel the need to "win" rather than seek clarity.
In polite societ bigots are often ridiculed. The stupid bastards soon
learn to keep their faith based crap to themselves. Hopefully their
children will break the cycle and live decent lives freed of their
parents brain slugs.
(M):
In polite societies, tolerance is exploited and disagreement is ridiculed.
BTW., I have not mentioned anything about faith based crap. Come to think of
it, I think Ethridge's question was, "does a person choose to be gay?" The
"incorrect" answer was yes. Still laughable since it implies someone who is
gay can not abstain from sex.
The truth is, both homo and heterosexuality are learned behaviours. We
choose who to have sex with. If a male has sex with another male, its two
males having sex. Nothing more. Adding a name to the behaviour and then
insisting it is genetic is junk science and politically motivated.
It could just as easily have been considered an aversion to having children,
given a name and shown using junk science that it is genetic. This is no
more accurate than claiming a sexual choice is genetically based or
masturbation is genetically based aversion to sexual partners. Its pure bull
shit.
| 
