|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: John BlackJohn Black
Date: Jun 30, 2007 20:36
>
> "Frank Pittel" warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
> news:EZCdnWEO97-Q7hvbnZ2dnUVZ_uHinZ2d@giganews.com...>> In alt.politics.usa.republican Robert not Roberto nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> : "Tom Mason" socal.rr.com> wrote in message
>> : news:i6ghi.8214$bP5.5588@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net...
>> : > Much of the west is experienceing a massive drought.
>> : >
>>
>> : Massive drought? One dry year = a massive drought?
>>
>> There are always droughts in the west. Most of the west is a desert.
>> Most of california would be a desert were it not for the water brought
>> in from other states. Even during the 70s when the world was
>> experiencing global cooling and we were entering an ice age there were
>> massive droughts in the west. ...
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JBgarbuzJBgarbuz
Date: Jun 30, 2007 10:19
The US should build a 2000 mile fence for a total cost of $6 billion
dollars, and then pull out of NAFTA and break relations with Mexico. Mexico
is an enemy state. It has been tryting to get even since 1847, and won't
stop until the US is brought down, just as the Palestinians won't stop until
Israel is brought down. Instead, the US should push for a Free Trade
Agreement with the EU. The US has nothing to gain, and everything to lose
(assuming there is anything left to lose) by making FTA's with third world
countries. The only thing those countries have to export are their
impoverished criminals. The US cannot bring them up, but they can surely
bring the US down, and have been doing so for quite a while now.
"chatnoir" mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1183160950.568088.210740@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...> Both like to build fences on other people's properties!
>
>
|
| Show full article (4.61Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JonesJones
Date: Jun 30, 2007 03:17
Graphic Queen wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:45:57 -0400, Governor Swill
> gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:42:29 -0600, Graphic Queen pagan.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> The problem is that our immigration laws don't take reality into
>>>> account. They don't allow for enough poor, uneducated people to
>>>> come into the country, specifically from this hemisphere.
>>>>
>>>> Swill
>>>
>>> And exactly why should we? Most other countries demand that
>>> immigrants be skilled and educated. What the hell is wrong with us
>>> wanting the same thing?
>>
>> Because white people aren't having enough babies to put new workers
>> into the labor pool. And because people with two nickels are
>> spending them on their kids having a fun childhood instead of making ...
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: proudamericanproudamerican
Date: Jun 29, 2007 19:49
>
>
>>If you were a real American worried about helping the less fortunate you
>>would be helping American citizens not criminals. Lots of starving kids
>>out there. Lots of poor people without a pot to pee in. These illegal
>>aliens do not deserve anything at all from America.
I noticed you said in a post :
"In fact, no a single arab, terrorist or legal will dare to step nearby
around the southern border. Why? Because it is ours, we control
it(*)."
I would like to know who" we " is. Are you American or Mexican. The only
ones controlling that border are Mexicans. Bush will not allow any law
enforcment.
What makes you think that terrorists can not come through Mexico...
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JonesJones
Date: Jun 29, 2007 15:36
SwampMidget wrote:
>> Man you are stupid.
>
> Although I usually skip posts that begin with the childish ad hominem,
> I will suffer the lib screeching this one time. It is my sincere hope
> that you can edify yourself with some basic logic and perhaps drop the
> bumper sticker slogans that so many of your ilk try to pass as wisdom.
>
>> Most Americans don't even see immigrants as illegals.
>> It is you hate mongering right wing nutjobs that think people should
>> be stopped on the streets and asked for their papers.
>
> 1) I don't "hate" illegal immigrants, I simply want the laws of our
> country to be enforced. Please list the countries that do not enforce ...
|
| Show full article (2.40Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JonesJones
Date: Jun 29, 2007 15:32
Jerry Okamura wrote:
> "Jones" jones.con> wrote in message
> news:468423bc$0$16380$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...>> Jerry Okamura wrote:
>>> "Captain America" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4eSdnb8MtocXlh7bnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com...>>>> Yet, we in the United States can't chant that about our president
>>>> when we are pissed off at the pumps and we have "freedom of
>>>> speech". So, we want to bomb a country that can't refine oil, much less
>>>> know
>>>> how to make a nuclear bomb, and a country that can threaten death
>>>> of their own president?
>>>>
>>>
>>> "If" they do not know how to make a nuclear bomb, why is the
>>> international community so worked up about trying to stop them from
>>> doing what they cannot do?
>>
>> The same as the last time. Like Bush said if they want to and would
>> if they could then that is good enough. Then they would want to ...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Jerry OkamuraJerry Okamura
Date: Jun 29, 2007 02:09
"Deathbringer" wrote in message
news:Deathbringer.2spfoh@wpyo.bbs.local...
>
> the_blogologist;1526546 Wrote:
>> Harry Hope ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>> "I think we should just declare victory," he said.
>>>
>>> "And then get out of there."
>>
>> We lost 400,000 KIA in World War II that he fought. Does he suggest we
>> should have given up in that war?
>
> That war had to happen. It was a matter of survival.
>
> Did Iraq have to happen? Tell me, why did they have to fabricate all
> that intelligence about Iraq's WMDs? Is our continued presence moving
> Iraq into a brighter future, or an even darker one?
>
Who believed that Iraq did not have WMD's? Why did the members of the UN ...
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Jerry OkamuraJerry Okamura
Date: Jun 29, 2007 02:09
> On Jun 24, 3:47 pm, "Kevin Cunningham" mindspring.com> wrote:>> "the_blogologist" nowheres.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1i07gwb.70b0jk8jcq32N%%nobody@nowheres.com...> Harry Hope
>> ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "I think we should just declare victory," he said.
>>
>>>> "And then get out of there."
>>
>>> We lost 400,000 KIA in World War II that he fought. Does he suggest we
>>> should have given up in that war?
>>
>> In WWII we had been attacked by the Japanese. We weren't attacked by the
>> Iraqi's. The Iraqis had nothing what so ever to do with 9/11. Would it
>> have been better to attack Mexico after Pearl Harbor? There closer.
>>
>> Your obviously not a loyal American. This man honorably fought for his ...
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Jerry OkamuraJerry Okamura
Date: Jun 29, 2007 02:08
>
> "the_blogologist" nowheres.com> wrote in message
> news:1i07gwb.70b0jk8jcq32N%%nobody@nowheres.com...>> Harry Hope ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>> "I think we should just declare victory," he said.
>>>
>>> "And then get out of there."
>>
>> We lost 400,000 KIA in World War II that he fought. Does he suggest we
>> should have given up in that war?
>>
> In WWII we had been attacked by the Japanese. We weren't attacked by the
> Iraqi's. The Iraqis had nothing what so ever to do with 9/11. Would it
> have been better to attack Mexico after Pearl Harbor? There closer.
A little more complicated that that simple statement. The United States at
the time, claimed we were a neutral nation. Were we a neutral nation? No,
we were not. Neutral nations do not help either...
|
| Show full article (2.86Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: aamm.boardaamm.board
Date: Jun 29, 2007 01:37
> On Jun 28, 4:41 pm, "GO Mavs" MavvZ.com> wrote:>> You dont understand. You guys dont have a chance to defeat him. You
>> had 4 chances (2 in Texas and 2 federal) and you lost all 4 times.
>>
>> In short, a complete dumbass (as you call him) beat you four times.
>> LOL!
>>
>> ROFLMAO
>>
>
> Wow, I guess then that 65%% of the American population turning against
> him isn't enough?
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
