On Thu, 13 May 2010 01:17:46 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 12 May 2010 19:12:59 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>On Wed, 12 May 2010 05:46:09 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:52:21 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>On Sun, 9 May 2010 08:31:57 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>On Sun, 09 May 2010 05:17:15 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>On Sat, 8 May 2010 08:56:52 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>On Sat, 08 May 2010 08:28:26 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:23:14 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 May 2010 10:10:02 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 1 May 2010 19:40:43 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:28:48 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:16:28 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:52:09 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:08:28 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:15:45 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:24:37 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:40:21 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:42:39 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:07:00 -0700 (PDT), Russell Ronco
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:35:31 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Walter Harding
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:57:35 -0700, Tag Heuer
gmail.dot.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Why" doesn't this fat tub of oxy-contin lard just simply shut the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>F%%&k up? He should be talking about his upcoming travel plans and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>relocation to Costa Rica -
http://tinyurl.com/2fhpws9>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh. Stop Limbaugh from telling the truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Apparently a Ditto-head's sense of satire is like a fatal head-on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>collision on the Interstate. But I didn't know that 'Hillbilly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Heroin' aka oxy contin is some form of 'truth serum' for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>un-informed and ignorant. Please elaborate, Walt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>To learn more about President Obama's addiction to alcohol, pot and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cocaine, refer to his autobiography "Dreams of My Father". To learn more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about the President's treatment for his addictions, refer to him medical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>records - that is, if he were ever to release them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In the least he is candid enough about his addiction(s), when he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>young, to write about it later in life. Limbaugh OTOH didn't admit he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>was one until he looking at the possibility of going to trial and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>possibly jail for his alleged crime(s) going into his geriatric years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and proving once and for all that he is nothing more than a lump of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>turd:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"I am addicted to pain medication ..." -
http://tinyurl.com/yggtnam
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's to laugh how he tries to diminish the gravity of his own drug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>addiction and more repulsive to the core is his own hypocrisy on this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>He was candid when there was a big, fat, royalty check for his best
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>seller. When he became a presidential candidate.... not so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We have no idea how if he's still on the stuff. Releasing his medical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>records would clear up that issue, but he refuses to do so. Why is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that, I wonder?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That could be asked of just about any President, President-elect or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Presidential hopeful - that tardive dyskinesic miscreant George W.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bush fought not to reveal his service record with the Texas Air
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>National Guard during the Vietnam War. Any other questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, why do you lie so much? George Bush most certainly did reveal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>his military record.... along with his medical history and his college
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transcripts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>'Any pages from Bush's flight log? Records from the Flight Inquiry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Board convened after Bush was suspended as a pilot? Any evidence of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bush's reclassification into another AFSC after suspension as a pilot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any photos of George Bush in a military uniform after 1972? Anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>at all from any Alabama unit with Bush's name on it? Any copies of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>form 44a from the Alabama National Guard certifying attendance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Air Force Form 142 (Aviation Service Audit Worksheet)? Anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>proving service (not just receipt of pay) by Bush between May 1972 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>May 1973?' etc. etc?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oranges .... Bush must produced tens of thousands of day to day
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>activities from decades past. Apples... Obama doesn't have to produce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his medical record, his college transcripts, or anything else. So, all one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to do to destroy free speech in this country is declare any idea you don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>agree with "hate?" The Republicans should remember this when they take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>back control in November. Of course not - the President must be held to a far
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>higher standard. You're the one who demands more from a talk show host than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the President of the United States.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You unmitigated dumbsh%%t, that's the whole point! And of which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>atmospheres above and past you, for it was YOU who brought up and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dragged in the POTUS, and compared him that oxy contin pill popping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Golden EIB microphone shoved up his bung Limbaugh, and of who AXED the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>question in the FIRST place. Jheezus H. Keer-ryst! You Ditto-bots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are beyond any reasonable doubt that ya'll are as dense as HE is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's my point - that you hold a talk show host to a far higher
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>standard than a man who can literally destroy the world during a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>single drinking binge. Your "point" is to bluster and scream, and try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and make the entire issue go away. Rush became addicted to pain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>killers after a back operation. Obama voluntarily embraced his addiction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>He was drunk, stoned and coked to the gills almost every day for years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No heroin, though. (He claims) He's never discussed what treatment he's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>received to deal with his addictive personality. He's never released his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>medical records. And you insist this is not an issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You again. You haven't proven anything much less a point. You defend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Limbaugh's addiction to a back operation but cannot atone for his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hypocrisy on this issue involving drug abuse. Instead you come up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with a single sentence excuse on his behalf. Additionally, and for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>all I've cited (which you completely ignore) it was Limbaugh who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>raised this crazed and race-baiting question over Obama and 'White
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>People' and it appears that he is having some sort of re-lapse - The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hyperbolic and lunatic fringe spin over Obama's citizenship and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>medical records are just that Presidential election campaign 'spin'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and for which you cannot get past and accept that he is now the POTUS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>- Furthermore and germane to this exchange is that you 'simply do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>get it,' now do you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Furthermore, and in terms of "Republicans in November" remembering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything they cannot, will no,t and are simply trying to forget who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the last POTUS was! And it is this sort of cognitive dissonance and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>selective memory that is keeping them in the Political Wilderness for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>years to come - Do you realize they ended their filibuster of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Financial Regulatory Reform Bill in realization that their behavior
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anal retentive behavior puts them squarely in cahoots with Goldman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sucks and all of the Wall Street miscreants who played a greater part
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the collapse of the U.S. economy? Of course not. You are a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dittohead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ah, Goldman Sachs - the company that donated about a million dollars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to the Obama administration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As well as many others in Republican party ... And of which was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>consistent. However, they are now answering for their sins and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can thank de-regulation of Wall Street during to the Reagan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>administration which part an parcel led up to this financial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>catastrophe and crisis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>For every dollar Goldman Sach spent on a Republican, they spent three
>>>>>>>>>>>>>on the Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Hm. So following your simplfied logic the other 25%% were to
>>>>>>>>>>>>Republicans and apparently from the leadership those who were grilled
>>>>>>>>>>>>in the Senate last week, right? -
http://tinyurl.com/2a9xzm3>>>>>>>>>>>>It goes to show you that even Obama with his $4,463,788 in campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>donations from Goldman-Sachs -EMPLOYEES- cannot be so easily
>>>>>>>>>>>>influenced in the context of the Wall St. Reform Bill, and where, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>recent news, Republicans certainly are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>[(Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Thursday a Republican
>>>>>>>>>>>>amendment to a financial reform bill under consideration by the U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Senate would "gut consumer protections" and he called on lawmakers to
>>>>>>>>>>>>reject it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>"I will not allow amendments like this one written by Wall Street's
>>>>>>>>>>>>lobbyists to pass for reform," Obama said in a written statement. "I
>>>>>>>>>>>>urge the Senate to vote 'no' on weakening consumer protections and
>>>>>>>>>>>>instead stand with the American people."]
>>>>>>>>>>>>We know who are in the 'pockets of Wall Street,' and just who their
>>>>>>>>>>>>'bookies' are, but this conservative-Republican blogosphere spin over
>>>>>>>>>>>>the GS donations, and coming from Republican (sic) 'strategists' and
>>>>>>>>>>>>possibly Wall St. lobbyists is clearly on par with Limbaugh's moronic
>>>>>>>>>>>>statement yesterday that the Times Sq. Bomber was a "registered
>>>>>>>>>>>>Democrat" and with an "Obama bumpersticker" on the vehicle, you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>missed my point altogether and proof that Limbaugh is nothing more
>>>>>>>>>>>>than a sack of turd. Why doesn't Limbaugh 'reconnect' with whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>is left of his brain?
>>>>>>>>>>>The same must be said about Bush, and Enron's - EMPLOYEES -
>>>>>>>>>>>"donations". Be prepared for almost three years of explaining why
>>>>>>>>>>>Bush acrtivities are outragous, but much larger versions of the same
>>>>>>>>>>>acts don't count when done by Obama.
>>>>>>>>>>Given Limbaugh's level of deranged behavior and lunatic fringe
>>>>>>>>>>nut-jobs and tools wandering in and out of the Political Wilderness
>>>>>>>>>>seeking scraps of political clout or influence, I wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>>>surprised, and I expect it to ramp up leading into the 2012 General
>>>>>>>>>>Election. Nevertheless, it'll be interesting, however the damaged
>>>>>>>>>>wreaked after 8-years of George W. Bush cannot be compared to the job
>>>>>>>>>>that is now before Obama in fixing what has been damaged and or
>>>>>>>>>>destroyed, and where consensus will be the rule and judge, in the
>>>>>>>>>>coming "three years." And when recovery from the devastation is in
>>>>>>>>>>full swing, will it not matter at all.
>>>>>>>>>Give it a rest. Rush has been on the air for twenty years - whether
>>>>>>>>>you like it or not, he's an established voice.
>>>>>>>>He's an established bigot and racist and nut-job with a microphone and
>>>>>>>>conservative Republican backers; of which agree with his deranged
>>>>>>>>notion of reality -
http://tinyurl.com/2bb63tz>>>>>>>>-
>>>>>>>>"Take that bone out of your nose and call me back ..." - Rush Limbaugh
>>>>>>>>aka Jeff Christie, WQV Pittsburgh, PA, circa 1972 (ref. Newsday)
>>>>>>>>" ... Sorry to say this, I don't think he's been that good from the
>>>>>>>>get-go. I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the
>>>>>>>>NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do
>>>>>>>>well. They're interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing
>>>>>>>>well. I think there's a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a
>>>>>>>>lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn't
>>>>>>>>deserve ..." Rush Limbaugh, not a very good sports commentator, circa
>>>>>>>>2003
>>>>>>>>" ... Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks
>>>>>>>>like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons.
>>>>>>>>There, I said it ... - Rush Limbaugh, still smarting from his days
>>>>>>>>and nights at ESPN, circa 2007
>>>>>>>>" ...And don't forget, Sherrod Brown is black. There's a racial
>>>>>>>>component here, too. And now, the newspaper that I'm reading all this
>>>>>>>>from is The New York Times, and they, of course, don't mention that."
>>>>>>>>- Rush Limbaugh, his complete ignorance over the fact that then-Rep.
>>>>>>>>Sherrod Brown (D-OH) is white, circa 2006
>>>>>>>>-
>>>>>>>For two decades you guys have been screaming that same, tired, song.
>>>>>>>It doesn't work anymore. The whole "racist" rant is tawdry, over
>>>>>>>used, and ineffective.
>>>>>>He's an established bigot and racist who has been "screaming" ad
>>>>>>infinitum such filth for decades, and where is he now 20 or more years
>>>>>>hence? As one political correspondent in commentary put it soon
>>>>>>after his oxy-contin addiction revelation: 'He's that crazed grizzled
>>>>>>old geriatric uncle who lives and incessantly rants to himself or
>>>>>>whomever will listen to him in that dank cellar of the GOP/Republican
>>>>>>party convention.'
>>>>>>Now he was credited in part for the so-called "Republican Revolution"
>>>>>>of 1994, given his love affair with then-Republican House Speaker Newt
>>>>>>Gingrich, however will the GOP wheel him out with such 'gala' and
>>>>>>revelry and with virtual 'ticker-tape parades' touting his demagoguery
>>>>>>in the manner that they did in that decade past? ... "One for the
>>>>>>Gipper," so-to-speak, in the coming 2010 mid-term elections? I
>>>>>>hardly doubt it.
>>>>>>Sure, conservatives and Republicans alike placate him from time to
>>>>>>time and 'throw him a bone' with fleeting if not sparse reference and
>>>>>>mention, however his time came and went like the dinosaurs and
>>>>>>knuckle-dragging troglodytes of epochs long past, and in contemporary
>>>>>>times where such arcane and decrepit, regressive, and most of all
>>>>>>divisive rhetoric and bigotry have no room in a nation which is
>>>>>>re-building from an un-mitigated 8+ years in the making economic,
>>>>>>social and national diaster.
>>>>>>Yet, there is that chance that GOP and Republicans do 'wheel him out'
>>>>>>from his shack in hinterlands of the 2009 Republican Political
>>>>>>Wilderness ... "For old time's sake," and to their own peril.
>>>>>Over the hears, I have spoken to a dozen people who were turned to
>>>>>conservatism by listening to Rush. At first, they tuned in to hear
>>>>>the freak show and laugh. They expected some venom spitting Klansman,
>>>>>who would make one idiotic, indefensible, statement after the other.
>>>>>and were shocked to hear a jovial fellow who possessed the ability to
>>>>>laugh at himself.
>>>>The Republican Political Wildnerness isn't representative of America
>>>>and you've got that right Limbaugh a "freak show." And it is only
>>>>delusion that one would think that he 'laughs at himself.' In fact he
>>>>routinely cut's off callers when there is cause to laugh at him.
>>>>>And many stayed after they found themselves agreeing with Rush.
>>>>Many left when they found out that he was nothing more than a pill
>>>>popping doctor shopping drug addict.
>>>>>You're wasting your time attacking Rush. Even if you could, by some
>>>>>miracle, force Rush off the air, there are literally hundreds
>>>>>(thousands, really) ready, willing and able to take his place.
>>>>He simply needs to get back to his roots with the G.O.P. and the
>>>>Republican party. But he is too chickensh&t to be "attacked" and
>>>>stand his ground on a matter of moral principles ... If not his
>>>>convictions ... Err, 'conviction.' But then again he has neither.
>>>What "Political Wilderness?" Consistently, American's favor the
>>>Republicans by roughly two to one on the major issues. 60%% favor
>>>repealing ObamaCare, about 30%% support it. 60%% support Arizonia's
>>>law. Americans are overwhelmingly against Cap and Trade, Amnesty, and
>>>massive deficits.
>>Here is news for you - Polls are subjective as they are fickle. But
>>just keep staring at it because when the 'sun comes up in morning of a
>>New Day in America' the landscape will not be what you thought some
>>sampled robo-poll questionnaire would provide you all with in the way
>>of a conviction. And in terms of the Political Wilderness, take a
>>gander at that motley crew called "Tea Baggers" which the Republican
>>party un-officially/offically espouses as well as what is happening on
>>AM conservative talk radio - ie. the GOP and Republican Party
>>echo-chamber of psychotic horrors.
>A fact you would do well to remember when you convince yourself that
>the conservatives are in "political wilderness." Is that the lies you guys tell
>yourselves? Yes, yes.... we know that you have an absolute contempt for
>Americans.
The "political wilderness" is your nightmare; it's your reality of
where the GOP Republican party most certainly is, however it is
apparent that ya'll are regressively and retentively suffering from a
severe case of strict denial in your unwillingness to accept the
absolute "truth," of your pathetic political existence. And it is
amusing:
" ...Two words capture Republicans' prospects for winning in Dallas
County: national mood.
The GOP, swept from most county offices by Democrats in 2006, hopes to
rebound in November with a base that's fired up over its dislike of
President Barack Obama, his health care overhaul, and oncoming
environmental legislation.
Here's the Republican hope. In a county that's still nearly evenly
split, an energized base could lead them out of the wilderness and
avenge the horror of 2006, when Democrats won every contested
countywide race ..." -
http://tinyurl.com/3xqnkhn
>>>The American people take a look at Greece and shutter when they think
>>>"that will be the United States in a decade - only we won't have the
>>>EU and America to bail us out." They see Obama golfing while a
>>>foreign corporation spreads oil on the Gulf Of Mexico. Most Americans
>>>know that massive inflation and tax hikes are the logical conclusion
>>>of the Obama administration. Social Security and Medicare are
>>>bankrupt.
>>Americans don't "shudder." They/we are resilient and come back from
>>adversity ... It's the Republicans and conservatives who want them to.
>>Look at what -they- and Bush did to America after 9/11 in order to
>>wield their deranged ideology and twisted sense of "patriotism," over
>>a threat that was not in one country but another. No. "Most
>>Americans" now feel a bit more optimistic and 'hopeful' (remember that
>>term from the last election?) now that the real "bums" are wandering
>>the Political Wilderness, looking for some clue and where they left
>>their collective asses.
>And that's why we have a Tea Party. November 2th, 2010, is the day
>your dreams all die.
Obviously the term and word "hope" does not exist in the conservative
G.O.P. Republican lexicon, however it does exist with Americans who do
not subscribe to those squealing in the Political Wilderness, seeking
leadership, direction or redemption. Now in terms of the mid-Term
elections, "hope springs eternal," and if anything will "die" it most
certainly will be the desperate exhumation of a 2-year-dead
conservative GOP/Republican political ideology and (sic) leadership
which ushered & led this nation to the brink of disaster and potential
economic ruin & collapse ... And on 11/2/2010 you want to return to
that 2000-2001 failed experiment in Government? Of course, because
that is all that you regressives have to "hope" for.
>>>Not only are the Republicans going to take back the House in six
>>>(count em, six months .... uno, dos, trace, quatro, cinco, ciace) but
>>>the soft, squishy, "reasonable" Republicans aren't going to be there.
>>>Be prepared for a lot of investigations in the Democrats futures.
>>>Jail time, too. What Obama has done is given the Republicans an issue
>>>to campaign on for decades - "repeal Obamaism".
>>In the context and comparison with 8-years of a failed Republican
>>President and legislative rule, who drove this country into the
>>ground? Tell me how that selective memory is working 'fer 'ya in of
>>and for a victory by the Republicans in November? Oh, that's right
>>... Tea Baggers and the 'Vast Rightwing Conspiracy.' LOL!
>The Democrats took over both Houses three and a half years ago.
>Since they have, the deficit has increased an eight fold, and unemployment
>has doubled.
Bull-sh%%t - What do you expect of the Democrats in Congress to fix
after 4-5 years of a Republican majority with a failed Republican
president drunkenly driving the American economy over the cliff?
[2001 vs. 2012]
... Causes for Changes in CBO Forecasts.The U.S. budget situation has
deteriorated significantly since 2001, when the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) forecast average annual surpluses of approximately $850
billion from 2009-2012. The average deficit forecast in each of those
years is now approximately $1,215 billion. The New York Times analyzed
this roughly $2 trillion "swing," separating the causes into four
major categories along with their share:
Recessions or the business cycle (37%%);
Policies enacted by President Bush (33%%);
Policies enacted by President Bush and supported or extended by
President Obama (20%%); and
New policies from President Obama (10%%).
CBO data is based only on current law, so policy proposals that have
yet to be made law are not included in their analysis. The article
concluded that President Obama's decisions accounted for only a
"sliver" of the deterioration, but that he "...does not have a
realistic plan for reducing the deficit..."
-
http://tinyurl.com/n96gzq
And IMO if it weren't for the Democrats regaining majority control
(and restraint) it may not have been a "Recession," but the second
"Depression." I know it is very difficult for any anal-retentive,
regressive repugnant Republican to grasp, however and to this point
strict-denial is all ya'll have left to accept, but just don't forget
which political party and ideology got us into this mess in the
...FIRST PLACE - And remember this fact: Clinton left Bush with a
budget surplus, and this reality is what drives you GOP'ers and
Republicans into those hideous cranial-rectal inversions when you
whine and bitch about 'the way things oughta be.' ... And all of which
drove ya'll into that depressingly desolate and howling Political
Wilderness, of where ya'll are now. There's no denying this.
>>>Meanwhile, you guys giggle about a drug addiction Rush beat seven
>>>years ago.
>>No. It's Limbaugh and the rest of the hyenas on the Fox News Network,
>>and MSNBC who are doing all the psychotic 'giggling' and laughing for
>>the sake of developing a coherent platform going into the mid-term
>>Elections. In fact, I've spelled it out for you clearly on two
>>threads ... With emphasis, mind you, and to this point, you "still
>>don't get it."
>>Now tell me how that 'split personality' and Love-Hate relationship
>>with your beloved G.O.P. is workin' for 'ya. Bet you are having one
>>'gay La La' G.O.P. of a party later this fall. BTW ... Is 'Eddie
>>Haskell,' gonna your MC on the Usenet? ... Will he come out in drag
>>imitating and 'mimicking' Lady Gaga?
>>The 'Paparazzi' breathlessly waits - LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Get the picture?
