In article r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> The_Carpathia yahoo.com> writes:
>>> With all of the people trying to find someone to blame for higher fuel
>>> prices and unemployment, it is notable to mention that Bill Clinton
>>> recently said we SHOULD slow down the economy...for the environment...
>>
>>
>>> That link has a link to the quote and video clip in question. It
>>> should be totally clear to anyone that the motivation behind the
>>> global warming promotion is the socialist goal of equal distribution
>>> of income, worldwide, since Clinton says the "rich countries" should
>>> cut back on production, while the poor, socialist, countries would be
>>> allowed to keep their production running full steam (let it be noted
>>> that one of those "poor" countries...China...is the world's largest
>>> air polluter. Thus, Clinton and the other global warming advocates
>>> only want CAPITALIST countries to slow production, while giving a
>>> green light to socialist countries. That's not a conspiracy theory,
>>> anymore. It's straight from their own mouths.
>>
>> And just why do you automatically characterize any poor
>> third-world country as "socialist"?
>>
>>
>>
>>> So, what do you think? Feel like paying more and having less jobs to
>>> support worldwide socialism?
>>
>> How un-Christian to suggest that the rich give something
>> of themselves to help the poor.
>>
>> -- cary
>
> Suggest that they give or steal from the rich (against their will)?
>
"...they give or steal from the rich"?
In some language that's English?
If we voluntarily choose to slow our growth while other nations come up
to speed, that's somehow "stealing", "against our will"?
Jesus wept...
-- cary