"Day Brown"
hughes.net> wrote in message
news:YLEVj.1423$yP7.1291@newsfe18.lga...> John P. wrote:
>> The flip side supported by the kook fringe is that explosives would
>> somehow explain the pulverization of concrete into dust. Let's consider
>> just the basics of such a theory. One would assume if explosives were
>> placed in the building, their purpose would be to cause their collapse.
>> To do so, these explosives would have been placed on either the core
>> columns, the perimeter columns, or both. Since no explosions are seen or
>> heard, we can rule out explosives on the perimeter columns as they would
>> have been highly visible and audible.
> Scuze me? but there are innumerable reports of explosions.
Free hint for the clueless....sounds of explosions does not equate to
explosives.
>Most credible is the video and audio at a nearby fire station where a
>French crew had been there, since before 911, doing a documentary. They
>show the guys, standing around in the station, talking about what they'd
>experiences, as we know men do after a shift.
More credibile is the seismic record showing no explosive detonations.
>
> And talking about both hearing and feeling the explosions.
If you real had a psych degree, you would know that people associate the
unfamiliar with the familiar.
> Furthermore, we'll see. Jones says two other labs have been analyzing the
> dust, and that two other professional journals will be publishing reports,
> in all cases by people who have no connection whatever with Jones. I await
> those reports.
Which will be menaingless since Jones cannot show a chain of custody of the
samples.
>
> I grant you that kooks were the first to challenge the official reports.
> This is what you'd expect, if you had read Plato. Socrates said it was the
> kooks who notice things others miss. Which we now know is because they
> dont go along with group think. Just because so many of their ideas are
> lunacy does not, in fact, prove that all their ideas are.
>
> I have a degree in psyche, have worked in clinical settings, and have
> spent time with the seriously demented, who nonetheless do have times when
> they are lucid, and their observations can be remarkable. Calling me a
> kook does not prove anything.
>
> More importantly however, is where all this is going, which is nowhere-
> unless there is a serious economic crisis, and the power elites need
> scapegoats. 911 will provide them, and distract the sheeple from their
> more immediate concerns while the boardrooms try to figure out what to do
> next.
>
> This whole con job began out of the awareness that sheeple need simple
> answers, and the real politik necessity to station troops in Iraq. 911 and
> Saddam's WMD are all part of the same con job because sheeple are just too
> fucking stupid and neurotic to provide the political mandate to do what is
> needed in a timely fashion.
>
> Neither the leadership nor the media hacks are all that rational either,
> or these wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would have been won by now. Still,
> it was necessary to stop the flow of oil money to Saddam and the jihadim
> because their aggressive actions were not going to cease, and this was
> raising insurance rates on high rise towers.
>
> I've been posting a machiavelian analysis for a couple years now, and it
> has held up rather well. Bush provided the iron fist, and soon it'll be
> time for the velvet glove.
>
>
